Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1641676 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-05-15 15:40 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-05-17 05:30 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH V2 2/6] tty: serial: lpuart: add little endian 32 bit register support Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> - 2017-05-15 15:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH V2 2/6] tty: serial: lpuart: add little endian 32 bit register support Dong Aisheng <dongas86@gmail.com> - 2017-05-17 05:30 +0200
| From | Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-15 15:40 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH V2 2/6] tty: serial: lpuart: add little endian 32 bit register support |
| Message-ID | <tHoo9-lZ-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 10:48 AM, Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@nxp.com> wrote: > It's based on the exist lpuart32 read/write implementation. Same as per previous comment (perhaps not in other UART driver, but some might have been using device property for that. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dong Aisheng <dongas86@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-17 05:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tHXOW-69n-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1641676 |
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 04:36:25PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 10:48 AM, Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@nxp.com> wrote: > > It's based on the exist lpuart32 read/write implementation. > > Same as per previous comment (perhaps not in other UART driver, but > some might have been using device property for that. > The reason why we do that is: a) we don't want to make a churn on the exist users. b) it's not really necessary to use dt property when we already have a soc_data as it has no much benefit but introduce overhead. Regards Dong Aisheng > > -- > With Best Regards, > Andy Shevchenko
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web