Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1642154 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Steven Pease <spease@suitabletech.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-05-16 03:20 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-05-16 08:10 +0200 |
| Articles | 4 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
CVE-2016-10229 in 4.4.x series Steven Pease <spease@suitabletech.com> - 2017-05-16 03:20 +0200
Re: CVE-2016-10229 in 4.4.x series Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> - 2017-05-16 07:30 +0200
Re: CVE-2016-10229 in 4.4.x series Steven Pease <spease@suitabletech.com> - 2017-05-16 08:00 +0200
Re: CVE-2016-10229 in 4.4.x series Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> - 2017-05-16 08:10 +0200
| From | Steven Pease <spease@suitabletech.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-16 03:20 +0200 |
| Subject | CVE-2016-10229 in 4.4.x series |
| Message-ID | <tHzjA-7hu-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Hi, This is my first post - not currently subscribed so please CC me. :) I searched a bit for this question, but couldn't find an answer (Googled '2016-10229 site:lkml.org'). Does CVE-2016-10229 affect the newest version of the 4.4.x kernel series (currently 4.4.68) and are there any plans to fix this in the 4.4 kernel series? Thanks, -- - Steven
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-16 07:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tHDdw-1qC-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1642154 |
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 06:09:53PM -0700, Steven Pease wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is my first post - not currently subscribed so please CC me. :) I
> searched a bit for this question, but couldn't find an answer (Googled
> '2016-10229 site:lkml.org').
>
> Does CVE-2016-10229 affect the newest version of the 4.4.x kernel
> series (currently 4.4.68) and are there any plans to fix this in the
> 4.4 kernel series?
This one was fixed by upstream commit 197c949 ("udp: properly support
MSG_PEEK with truncated buffers"), which was backported in 4.4 as
commit dfe2042d96 in 4.4.21. So in short, 4.4.68 is safe.
Willy
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steven Pease <spease@suitabletech.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-16 08:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tHDGy-1Df-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1642217 |
Is there any particular reason that the CVE appears to be filed
against 4.4.60? Or is this just a mistake?
http://www.cvedetails.com/cve/CVE-2016-10229/
- Steven
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 10:20 PM, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> wrote:
> On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 06:09:53PM -0700, Steven Pease wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This is my first post - not currently subscribed so please CC me. :) I
>> searched a bit for this question, but couldn't find an answer (Googled
>> '2016-10229 site:lkml.org').
>>
>> Does CVE-2016-10229 affect the newest version of the 4.4.x kernel
>> series (currently 4.4.68) and are there any plans to fix this in the
>> 4.4 kernel series?
>
> This one was fixed by upstream commit 197c949 ("udp: properly support
> MSG_PEEK with truncated buffers"), which was backported in 4.4 as
> commit dfe2042d96 in 4.4.21. So in short, 4.4.68 is safe.
>
> Willy
--
- Steven
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-16 08:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tHDQd-1Wi-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1642229 |
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 10:53:50PM -0700, Steven Pease wrote: > Is there any particular reason that the CVE appears to be filed > against 4.4.60? Or is this just a mistake? > > http://www.cvedetails.com/cve/CVE-2016-10229/ I have no idea why. Maybe they mentionned the current version at the moment the CVE was issued (which seems to match). In fact this bug was discovered as being a vulnerability long after the bug was fixed. Willy
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web