Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1642229
| From | Steven Pease <spease@suitabletech.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: CVE-2016-10229 in 4.4.x series |
| Date | 2017-05-16 08:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tHDGy-1Df-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tHzjA-7hu-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <tHDdw-1qC-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Is there any particular reason that the CVE appears to be filed
against 4.4.60? Or is this just a mistake?
http://www.cvedetails.com/cve/CVE-2016-10229/
- Steven
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 10:20 PM, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> wrote:
> On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 06:09:53PM -0700, Steven Pease wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This is my first post - not currently subscribed so please CC me. :) I
>> searched a bit for this question, but couldn't find an answer (Googled
>> '2016-10229 site:lkml.org').
>>
>> Does CVE-2016-10229 affect the newest version of the 4.4.x kernel
>> series (currently 4.4.68) and are there any plans to fix this in the
>> 4.4 kernel series?
>
> This one was fixed by upstream commit 197c949 ("udp: properly support
> MSG_PEEK with truncated buffers"), which was backported in 4.4 as
> commit dfe2042d96 in 4.4.21. So in short, 4.4.68 is safe.
>
> Willy
--
- Steven
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
CVE-2016-10229 in 4.4.x series Steven Pease <spease@suitabletech.com> - 2017-05-16 03:20 +0200
Re: CVE-2016-10229 in 4.4.x series Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> - 2017-05-16 07:30 +0200
Re: CVE-2016-10229 in 4.4.x series Steven Pease <spease@suitabletech.com> - 2017-05-16 08:00 +0200
Re: CVE-2016-10229 in 4.4.x series Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> - 2017-05-16 08:10 +0200
csiph-web