Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1635263 > unrolled thread

[PATCH 0/6] lockdep: Fine-tuning for some function implementations

Started bySF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
First post2017-05-03 22:40 +0200
Last post2017-05-03 22:50 +0200
Articles 6 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  [PATCH 0/6] lockdep: Fine-tuning for some function implementations SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2017-05-03 22:40 +0200
    [PATCH 2/6] lockdep: Use seq_putc() in seq_header() SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2017-05-03 22:40 +0200
    [PATCH 4/6] lockdep: Combine two seq_printf() calls into one call in  l_show() SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2017-05-03 22:50 +0200
    [PATCH 5/6] lockdep: Improve a size determination in lock_stat_open() SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2017-05-03 22:50 +0200
    [PATCH 6/6] lockdep: Add spaces for better code readability SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2017-05-03 22:50 +0200
    [PATCH 3/6] lockdep: Replace four seq_printf() calls by seq_puts() SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2017-05-03 22:50 +0200

#1635263 — [PATCH 0/6] lockdep: Fine-tuning for some function implementations

FromSF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Date2017-05-03 22:40 +0200
Subject[PATCH 0/6] lockdep: Fine-tuning for some function implementations
Message-ID<tD9e2-1So-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Wed, 3 May 2017 22:17:03 +0200

Some update suggestions were taken into account
from static source code analysis.

Markus Elfring (6):
  Replace 11 seq_puts() calls by seq_putc()
  Use seq_putc() in seq_header()
  Replace four seq_printf() calls by seq_puts()
  Combine two seq_printf() calls into one call in l_show()
  Improve a size determination in lock_stat_open()
  Add spaces for better code readability

 kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)

-- 
2.12.2

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1635265 — [PATCH 2/6] lockdep: Use seq_putc() in seq_header()

FromSF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Date2017-05-03 22:40 +0200
Subject[PATCH 2/6] lockdep: Use seq_putc() in seq_header()
Message-ID<tD9e2-1So-23@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1635263
From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Wed, 3 May 2017 21:30:26 +0200

A single character (line break) should be put into a sequence.
Thus use the corresponding function "seq_putc".

This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.

Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
---
 kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c
index 825496ece766..b1fa2ae31c0b 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c
@@ -560,7 +560,7 @@ static void seq_header(struct seq_file *m)
 			"holdtime-total",
 			"holdtime-avg");
 	seq_line(m, '-', 0, 40 + 1 + 12 * (14 + 1));
-	seq_printf(m, "\n");
+	seq_putc(m, '\n');
 }
 
 static void *ls_start(struct seq_file *m, loff_t *pos)
-- 
2.12.2

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1635267 — [PATCH 4/6] lockdep: Combine two seq_printf() calls into one call in l_show()

FromSF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Date2017-05-03 22:50 +0200
Subject[PATCH 4/6] lockdep: Combine two seq_printf() calls into one call in l_show()
Message-ID<tD9nH-1VW-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1635263
From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Wed, 3 May 2017 21:56:11 +0200

A bit of data was put into a sequence by two separate function calls.
Print the same data by a single function call instead.

This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.

Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
---
 kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c | 4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c
index a353f53b6de6..2cc0ccd2b3de 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c
@@ -75,7 +75,5 @@ static int l_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
 #endif
 
 	get_usage_chars(class, usage);
-	seq_printf(m, " %s", usage);
-
-	seq_printf(m, ": ");
+	seq_printf(m, " %s: ", usage);
 	print_name(m, class);
-- 
2.12.2

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1635269 — [PATCH 5/6] lockdep: Improve a size determination in lock_stat_open()

FromSF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Date2017-05-03 22:50 +0200
Subject[PATCH 5/6] lockdep: Improve a size determination in lock_stat_open()
Message-ID<tD9nH-1VW-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1635263
From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Wed, 3 May 2017 22:05:57 +0200

Replace the specification of a data structure by a pointer dereference
as the parameter for the operator "sizeof" to make the corresponding size
determination a bit safer according to the Linux coding style convention.

Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
---
 kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c
index 2cc0ccd2b3de..509a17f5ea01 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c
@@ -607,7 +607,7 @@ static int lock_stat_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
 {
 	int res;
 	struct lock_class *class;
-	struct lock_stat_seq *data = vmalloc(sizeof(struct lock_stat_seq));
+	struct lock_stat_seq *data = vmalloc(sizeof(*data));
 
 	if (!data)
 		return -ENOMEM;
-- 
2.12.2

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1635273 — [PATCH 6/6] lockdep: Add spaces for better code readability

FromSF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Date2017-05-03 22:50 +0200
Subject[PATCH 6/6] lockdep: Add spaces for better code readability
Message-ID<tD9nH-1VW-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1635263
From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Wed, 3 May 2017 22:11:28 +0200

Use space characters at some source code places according to
the Linux coding style convention.

Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
---
 kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c
index 509a17f5ea01..22c89868e6b1 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c
@@ -402,7 +402,7 @@ static void snprint_time(char *buf, size_t bufsiz, s64 nr)
 
 	nr += 5; /* for display rounding */
 	div = div_s64_rem(nr, 1000, &rem);
-	snprintf(buf, bufsiz, "%lld.%02d", (long long)div, (int)rem/10);
+	snprintf(buf, bufsiz, "%lld.%02d", (long long)div, (int)rem / 10);
 }
 
 static void seq_time(struct seq_file *m, s64 time)
@@ -461,11 +461,11 @@ static void seq_stats(struct seq_file *m, struct lock_stat_data *data)
 
 	namelen = strlen(name);
 	if (class->name_version > 1) {
-		snprintf(name+namelen, 3, "#%d", class->name_version);
+		snprintf(name + namelen, 3, "#%d", class->name_version);
 		namelen += 2;
 	}
 	if (class->subclass) {
-		snprintf(name+namelen, 3, "/%d", class->subclass);
+		snprintf(name + namelen, 3, "/%d", class->subclass);
 		namelen += 2;
 	}
 
@@ -504,7 +504,7 @@ static void seq_stats(struct seq_file *m, struct lock_stat_data *data)
 			break;
 
 		if (!i)
-			seq_line(m, '-', 40-namelen, namelen);
+			seq_line(m, '-', 40 - namelen, namelen);
 
 		snprintf(ip, sizeof(ip), "[<%p>]",
 				(void *)class->contention_point[i]);
@@ -519,7 +519,7 @@ static void seq_stats(struct seq_file *m, struct lock_stat_data *data)
 			break;
 
 		if (!i)
-			seq_line(m, '-', 40-namelen, namelen);
+			seq_line(m, '-', 40 - namelen, namelen);
 
 		snprintf(ip, sizeof(ip), "[<%p>]",
 				(void *)class->contending_point[i]);
-- 
2.12.2

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1635275 — [PATCH 3/6] lockdep: Replace four seq_printf() calls by seq_puts()

FromSF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Date2017-05-03 22:50 +0200
Subject[PATCH 3/6] lockdep: Replace four seq_printf() calls by seq_puts()
Message-ID<tD9nI-1VW-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1635263
From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Wed, 3 May 2017 21:46:49 +0200

Four strings which did not contain data format specifications should be put
into a sequence. Thus use the corresponding function "seq_puts".

This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.

Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
---
 kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c
index b1fa2ae31c0b..a353f53b6de6 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ static int l_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
 	char usage[LOCK_USAGE_CHARS];
 
 	if (v == &all_lock_classes) {
-		seq_printf(m, "all lock classes:\n");
+		seq_puts(m, "all lock classes:\n");
 		return 0;
 	}
 
@@ -141,8 +141,8 @@ static int lc_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
 
 	if (v == SEQ_START_TOKEN) {
 		if (nr_chain_hlocks > MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAIN_HLOCKS)
-			seq_printf(m, "(buggered) ");
-		seq_printf(m, "all lock chains:\n");
+			seq_puts(m, "(buggered) ");
+		seq_puts(m, "all lock chains:\n");
 		return 0;
 	}
 
@@ -541,7 +541,7 @@ static void seq_header(struct seq_file *m)
 	seq_puts(m, "lock_stat version 0.4\n");
 
 	if (unlikely(!debug_locks))
-		seq_printf(m, "*WARNING* lock debugging disabled!! - possibly due to a lockdep warning\n");
+		seq_puts(m, "*WARNING* lock debugging disabled!! - possibly due to a lockdep warning\n");
 
 	seq_line(m, '-', 0, 40 + 1 + 12 * (14 + 1));
 	seq_printf(m, "%40s %14s %14s %14s %14s %14s %14s %14s %14s %14s %14s "
-- 
2.12.2

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web