Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1631184 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH] memmap: Parse "Reserved" together with "reserved"

Started byIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
First post2017-04-26 08:30 +0200
Last post2017-04-26 13:00 +0200
Articles 4 — 3 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH] memmap: Parse "Reserved" together with "reserved" Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2017-04-26 08:30 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] memmap: Parse "Reserved" together with "reserved" Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com> - 2017-04-26 09:30 +0200
      Re: [PATCH] memmap: Parse "Reserved" together with "reserved" Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com> - 2017-04-26 09:40 +0200
        Re: [PATCH] memmap: Parse "Reserved" together with "reserved" Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au> - 2017-04-26 13:00 +0200

#1631184 — Re: [PATCH] memmap: Parse "Reserved" together with "reserved"

FromIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Date2017-04-26 08:30 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH] memmap: Parse "Reserved" together with "reserved"
Message-ID<tAoCC-6Wg-23@gated-at.bofh.it>
* Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> wrote:

> For x86 with recent kernel after
>  commit 640e1b38b0 ("x86/boot/e820: Basic cleanup of e820.c")
> change "reserved" to "Reserved" in /sys firmware memmap and /proc/iomem.
> 
> So here, we add handling for that too.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
> 
> ---
>  kexec/arch/i386/crashdump-x86.c |    2 ++
>  kexec/arch/ia64/kexec-ia64.c    |    2 ++
>  kexec/arch/mips/kexec-mips.c    |    2 ++
>  kexec/firmware_memmap.c         |    2 ++
>  4 files changed, 8 insertions(+)

I'd rather fix the bug I introduced and undo the reserved->Reserved string change 
in e820.c: I didn't realize that it's exposed in sysfs and had quasi-ABI 
consequences for kexec.

Agreed?

Thanks,

	Ingo

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1631205

FromDave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>
Date2017-04-26 09:30 +0200
Message-ID<tApyF-7vI-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1631184
On 04/26/17 at 08:22am, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> > For x86 with recent kernel after
> >  commit 640e1b38b0 ("x86/boot/e820: Basic cleanup of e820.c")
> > change "reserved" to "Reserved" in /sys firmware memmap and /proc/iomem.
> > 
> > So here, we add handling for that too.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
> > 
> > ---
> >  kexec/arch/i386/crashdump-x86.c |    2 ++
> >  kexec/arch/ia64/kexec-ia64.c    |    2 ++
> >  kexec/arch/mips/kexec-mips.c    |    2 ++
> >  kexec/firmware_memmap.c         |    2 ++
> >  4 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
> 
> I'd rather fix the bug I introduced and undo the reserved->Reserved string change 

This patch parses both 'reserved' and 'Reserved' it should be fine, but
reverting the change in kernel sounds better..

> in e820.c: I didn't realize that it's exposed in sysfs and had quasi-ABI 
> consequences for kexec.
> 
> Agreed?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 	Ingo
> 
> _______________________________________________
> kexec mailing list
> kexec@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec

Thanks
Dave

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1631207

FromDave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>
Date2017-04-26 09:40 +0200
Message-ID<tApIl-7Ah-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1631205
On 04/26/17 at 03:28pm, Dave Young wrote:
> On 04/26/17 at 08:22am, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > 
> > * Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > For x86 with recent kernel after
> > >  commit 640e1b38b0 ("x86/boot/e820: Basic cleanup of e820.c")
> > > change "reserved" to "Reserved" in /sys firmware memmap and /proc/iomem.
> > > 
> > > So here, we add handling for that too.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
> > > 
> > > ---
> > >  kexec/arch/i386/crashdump-x86.c |    2 ++
> > >  kexec/arch/ia64/kexec-ia64.c    |    2 ++
> > >  kexec/arch/mips/kexec-mips.c    |    2 ++
> > >  kexec/firmware_memmap.c         |    2 ++
> > >  4 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
> > 
> > I'd rather fix the bug I introduced and undo the reserved->Reserved string change 
> 
> This patch parses both 'reserved' and 'Reserved' it should be fine, but
> reverting the change in kernel sounds better..

Hmm, after press sending I noticed old kexec-tools with new kernel, it
is still a problem, so we'd better to revert the kernel changes.

> 
> > in e820.c: I didn't realize that it's exposed in sysfs and had quasi-ABI 
> > consequences for kexec.
> > 
> > Agreed?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > 	Ingo
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > kexec mailing list
> > kexec@lists.infradead.org
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
> 
> Thanks
> Dave

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1631394

FromSimon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
Date2017-04-26 13:00 +0200
Message-ID<tAsPV-197-33@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1631207
On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 03:31:48PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> On 04/26/17 at 03:28pm, Dave Young wrote:
> > On 04/26/17 at 08:22am, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > 
> > > * Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > For x86 with recent kernel after
> > > >  commit 640e1b38b0 ("x86/boot/e820: Basic cleanup of e820.c")
> > > > change "reserved" to "Reserved" in /sys firmware memmap and /proc/iomem.
> > > > 
> > > > So here, we add handling for that too.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
> > > > 
> > > > ---
> > > >  kexec/arch/i386/crashdump-x86.c |    2 ++
> > > >  kexec/arch/ia64/kexec-ia64.c    |    2 ++
> > > >  kexec/arch/mips/kexec-mips.c    |    2 ++
> > > >  kexec/firmware_memmap.c         |    2 ++
> > > >  4 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > I'd rather fix the bug I introduced and undo the reserved->Reserved string change 
> > 
> > This patch parses both 'reserved' and 'Reserved' it should be fine, but
> > reverting the change in kernel sounds better..
> 
> Hmm, after press sending I noticed old kexec-tools with new kernel, it
> is still a problem, so we'd better to revert the kernel changes.

FWIW, if the kernel change hasn't hit a release then reverting (the
reserved->Reserved portion of) it would be my preference.

> > > in e820.c: I didn't realize that it's exposed in sysfs and had quasi-ABI 
> > > consequences for kexec.
> > > 
> > > Agreed?
> > > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > 
> > > 	Ingo
> > > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > kexec mailing list
> > > kexec@lists.infradead.org
> > > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
> > 
> > Thanks
> > Dave
> 

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web