Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1578907 > unrolled thread

[PATCH v2 2/5] time: mark syscore_ops as __ro_after_init

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  [PATCH v2 2/5] time: mark syscore_ops as __ro_after_init Jess Frazelle <me@jessfraz.com> - 2017-02-11 02:40 +0100
    Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] time: mark syscore_ops as __ro_after_init John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> - 2017-02-11 03:20 +0100
      Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] time: mark syscore_ops as __ro_after_init Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2017-02-11 10:30 +0100

#1578907 — [PATCH v2 2/5] time: mark syscore_ops as __ro_after_init

Marked syscore_ops structs as __ro_after_init when register_syscore_ops was
called only during init. Most of the caller functions were already annotated as
__init.
unregister_syscore_ops() was never called on these ops.
This protects the data structure from accidental corruption.

Suggested-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Jess Frazelle <me@jessfraz.com>
Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
---
 kernel/time/sched_clock.c | 2 +-
 kernel/time/timekeeping.c | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/time/sched_clock.c b/kernel/time/sched_clock.c
index a26036d37a38..5df2fc07300b 100644
--- a/kernel/time/sched_clock.c
+++ b/kernel/time/sched_clock.c
@@ -289,7 +289,7 @@ static void sched_clock_resume(void)
 	rd->read_sched_clock = cd.actual_read_sched_clock;
 }

-static struct syscore_ops sched_clock_ops = {
+static struct syscore_ops sched_clock_ops __ro_after_init = {
 	.suspend	= sched_clock_suspend,
 	.resume		= sched_clock_resume,
 };
diff --git a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
index db087d7e106d..467e3021723a 100644
--- a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
@@ -1756,7 +1756,7 @@ int timekeeping_suspend(void)
 }

 /* sysfs resume/suspend bits for timekeeping */
-static struct syscore_ops timekeeping_syscore_ops = {
+static struct syscore_ops timekeeping_syscore_ops __ro_after_init = {
 	.resume		= timekeeping_resume,
 	.suspend	= timekeeping_suspend,
 };
--
2.11.0

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1578919

On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 5:37 PM, Jess Frazelle <me@jessfraz.com> wrote:
> Marked syscore_ops structs as __ro_after_init when register_syscore_ops was
> called only during init. Most of the caller functions were already annotated as
> __init.
> unregister_syscore_ops() was never called on these ops.
> This protects the data structure from accidental corruption.
>
> Suggested-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> Signed-off-by: Jess Frazelle <me@jessfraz.com>
> Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>

Thanks for sending this out. Looks reasonable to me. I'll queue it for
testing, targeting for 4.12.

thanks
-john

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1578966

On Fri, 10 Feb 2017, John Stultz wrote:

> On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 5:37 PM, Jess Frazelle <me@jessfraz.com> wrote:
> > Marked syscore_ops structs as __ro_after_init when register_syscore_ops was
> > called only during init. Most of the caller functions were already annotated as
> > __init.
> > unregister_syscore_ops() was never called on these ops.
> > This protects the data structure from accidental corruption.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Jess Frazelle <me@jessfraz.com>
> > Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
> 
> Thanks for sending this out. Looks reasonable to me. I'll queue it for
> testing, targeting for 4.12.

NAK. See:

  http://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB.2.20.1702110948030.3734@nanos

Thanks,

	tglx

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web