Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1573060 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-02-03 13:30 +0100 |
| Last post | 2017-02-09 11:10 +0100 |
| Articles | 6 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[PATCH] omapfb: dss: Handle return error in dss_init_ports. Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com> - 2017-02-03 13:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH] omapfb: dss: Handle return error in dss_init_ports. Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com> - 2017-02-06 16:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH] omapfb: dss: Handle return error in dss_init_ports. Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com> - 2017-02-07 13:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH] omapfb: dss: Handle return error in dss_init_ports. Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com> - 2017-02-08 11:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH] omapfb: dss: Handle return error in dss_init_ports. Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com> - 2017-02-08 15:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH] omapfb: dss: Handle return error in dss_init_ports. Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com> - 2017-02-09 11:10 +0100
| From | Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-03 13:30 +0100 |
| Subject | [PATCH] omapfb: dss: Handle return error in dss_init_ports. |
| Message-ID | <t6La2-1wS-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Here, dss_init_ports is not handling return error form
dpi_init_port and sdi_init_port. Now dss_init_ports is returning
always 0. And it's making below code as a dead code.
static int dss_bind(struct device *dev)
{
.
.
r = dss_init_ports(pdev); //dss_init_ports will return always 0
if (r)// This condition will always false
goto err_init_ports; //Dead Code
.
.
}
This change is to handle return error from dpi_init_port and
sdi_init_port. Also, It will remove dead code from function 'dss_bind'.
Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com>
---
drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/dss/dss.c | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/dss/dss.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/dss/dss.c
index 47d7f69..15a0dab 100644
--- a/drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/dss/dss.c
+++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/dss/dss.c
@@ -946,6 +946,7 @@ static int dss_init_ports(struct platform_device *pdev)
struct device_node *parent = pdev->dev.of_node;
struct device_node *port;
int r;
+ int ret = 0;
if (parent == NULL)
return 0;
@@ -972,17 +973,17 @@ static int dss_init_ports(struct platform_device *pdev)
switch (port_type) {
case OMAP_DISPLAY_TYPE_DPI:
- dpi_init_port(pdev, port);
+ ret = dpi_init_port(pdev, port);
break;
case OMAP_DISPLAY_TYPE_SDI:
- sdi_init_port(pdev, port);
+ ret = sdi_init_port(pdev, port);
break;
default:
break;
}
} while ((port = omapdss_of_get_next_port(parent, port)) != NULL);
- return 0;
+ return ret;
}
static void dss_uninit_ports(struct platform_device *pdev)
--
1.9.1
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-06 16:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <t7ToS-6Gk-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1573060 |
Hi,
On Friday, February 03, 2017 05:53:45 PM Arvind Yadav wrote:
> Here, dss_init_ports is not handling return error form
> dpi_init_port and sdi_init_port. Now dss_init_ports is returning
> always 0. And it's making below code as a dead code.
>
> static int dss_bind(struct device *dev)
> {
> .
> .
> r = dss_init_ports(pdev); //dss_init_ports will return always 0
> if (r)// This condition will always false
> goto err_init_ports; //Dead Code
> .
> .
> }
>
> This change is to handle return error from dpi_init_port and
> sdi_init_port. Also, It will remove dead code from function 'dss_bind'.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/dss/dss.c | 7 ++++---
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/dss/dss.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/dss/dss.c
> index 47d7f69..15a0dab 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/dss/dss.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/dss/dss.c
> @@ -946,6 +946,7 @@ static int dss_init_ports(struct platform_device *pdev)
> struct device_node *parent = pdev->dev.of_node;
> struct device_node *port;
> int r;
> + int ret = 0;
>
> if (parent == NULL)
> return 0;
> @@ -972,17 +973,17 @@ static int dss_init_ports(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> switch (port_type) {
> case OMAP_DISPLAY_TYPE_DPI:
> - dpi_init_port(pdev, port);
> + ret = dpi_init_port(pdev, port);
> break;
> case OMAP_DISPLAY_TYPE_SDI:
> - sdi_init_port(pdev, port);
> + ret = sdi_init_port(pdev, port);
> break;
> default:
> break;
> }
> } while ((port = omapdss_of_get_next_port(parent, port)) != NULL);
Shouldn't initialization be stopped after the first failure?
i.e.:
} while (!ret && (port = omapdss_of_get_next_port(parent, port)) != NULL);
Also the cleanup of the partial initialization is missing.
From looking at the code we should do something like this
before returning:
if (ret)
dss_uninit_ports(pdev);
(dpi_uninit_port() & sdi_uninit_port() skip not fully
initialized ports)
> - return 0;
> + return ret;
> }
>
> static void dss_uninit_ports(struct platform_device *pdev)
Best regards,
--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-07 13:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <t8cUx-2IN-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1574902 |
Hi, In dss_init_ports, There is no need to add dss_uninit_ports before returning. Because it's already take care in dss_bind. dss_bind is handling dss_uninit_ports in error path. -Arvind On Monday 06 February 2017 08:58 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > dpi_uninit_port() & sdi_uninit_port() skip not fully > initialized port
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-08 11:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <t8xPj-7AX-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1575609 |
Hi, On Tuesday, February 07, 2017 05:41:37 PM Arvind Yadav wrote: > Hi, > > In dss_init_ports, There is no need to add dss_uninit_ports before > returning. > Because it's already take care in dss_bind. dss_bind is handling > dss_uninit_ports in error path. It doesn't handle cleanup of partially initialized ports, please look at the code: ... r = dss_init_ports(pdev); if (r) goto err_init_ports; ... err_runtime_get: pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev); dss_uninit_ports(pdev); err_init_ports: if (dss.video1_pll) dss_video_pll_uninit(dss.video1_pll); ... dss_uninit_ports() is not called on partially initialized ports (when dss_init_ports() returns an error we go straight into err_init_ports label and skip dss_uninit_ports()) > -Arvind > > > On Monday 06 February 2017 08:58 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > dpi_uninit_port() & sdi_uninit_port() skip not fully > > initialized port Best regards, -- Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Samsung R&D Institute Poland Samsung Electronics
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-08 15:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <t8BzA-1u7-29@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1576424 |
On Wednesday, February 08, 2017 11:25:47 AM Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > Hi, > > On Tuesday, February 07, 2017 05:41:37 PM Arvind Yadav wrote: > > Hi, > > > > In dss_init_ports, There is no need to add dss_uninit_ports before > > returning. > > Because it's already take care in dss_bind. dss_bind is handling > > dss_uninit_ports in error path. > > It doesn't handle cleanup of partially initialized ports, BTW by "partially initialized ports" here I mean cases like i.e. dpi port fully initialized and sdi one not initialized > please look at the code: > > ... > r = dss_init_ports(pdev); > if (r) > goto err_init_ports; > ... > err_runtime_get: > pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev); > dss_uninit_ports(pdev); > err_init_ports: > if (dss.video1_pll) > dss_video_pll_uninit(dss.video1_pll); > ... > > dss_uninit_ports() is not called on partially initialized ditto > ports (when dss_init_ports() returns an error we go straight > into err_init_ports label and skip dss_uninit_ports()) > > > -Arvind > > > > > > On Monday 06 February 2017 08:58 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > > dpi_uninit_port() & sdi_uninit_port() skip not fully > > > initialized port Best regards, -- Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Samsung R&D Institute Poland Samsung Electronics
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-09 11:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <t8TPQ-4PF-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1576624 |
Hi, Yes, We will have to handle cleanup of partially initialized ports. As per your suggestion, I have done the changes. Thanks -Arvind On Wednesday 08 February 2017 07:51 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > On Wednesday, February 08, 2017 11:25:47 AM Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Tuesday, February 07, 2017 05:41:37 PM Arvind Yadav wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> In dss_init_ports, There is no need to add dss_uninit_ports before >>> returning. >>> Because it's already take care in dss_bind. dss_bind is handling >>> dss_uninit_ports in error path. >> It doesn't handle cleanup of partially initialized ports, > BTW by "partially initialized ports" here I mean cases like > i.e. dpi port fully initialized and sdi one not initialized > >> please look at the code: >> >> ... >> r = dss_init_ports(pdev); >> if (r) >> goto err_init_ports; >> ... >> err_runtime_get: >> pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev); >> dss_uninit_ports(pdev); >> err_init_ports: >> if (dss.video1_pll) >> dss_video_pll_uninit(dss.video1_pll); >> ... >> >> dss_uninit_ports() is not called on partially initialized > ditto > >> ports (when dss_init_ports() returns an error we go straight >> into err_init_ports label and skip dss_uninit_ports()) >> >>> -Arvind >>> >>> >>> On Monday 06 February 2017 08:58 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: >>>> dpi_uninit_port() & sdi_uninit_port() skip not fully >>>> initialized port > Best regards, > -- > Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz > Samsung R&D Institute Poland > Samsung Electronics >
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web