Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1569895 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-01-30 18:00 +0100 |
| Last post | 2017-01-31 04:40 +0100 |
| Articles | 2 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH v3 08/10] dmaengine: sun6i: allow build on ARM64 platforms (sun50i) Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com> - 2017-01-30 18:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH v3 08/10] dmaengine: sun6i: allow build on ARM64 platforms (sun50i) Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com> - 2017-01-31 04:40 +0100
| From | Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-01-30 18:00 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 08/10] dmaengine: sun6i: allow build on ARM64 platforms (sun50i) |
| Message-ID | <t5nt8-6kA-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 10:33:29AM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote: > As 64-bit Allwinner H5 SoC has the same DMA engine with H3, the DMA > driver should be allowed to be built for ARM64, in order to make it work on H5. > > Signed-off-by: Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@aosc.xyz> > Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> > Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org> > --- > Patch introduced between v1 and v2, to satisfy the newly added H3/H5 audio > codec support. > > drivers/dma/Kconfig | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/dma/Kconfig b/drivers/dma/Kconfig > index 0d6a96ee9fc7..d01d59812cf3 100644 > --- a/drivers/dma/Kconfig > +++ b/drivers/dma/Kconfig > @@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ config DMA_SUN4I > > config DMA_SUN6I > tristate "Allwinner A31 SoCs DMA support" > - depends on MACH_SUN6I || MACH_SUN8I || COMPILE_TEST > + depends on MACH_SUN6I || MACH_SUN8I || (ARM64 && ARCH_SUNXI) || COMPILE_TEST Do we really need ARM64 here? also looking at others I wonder why isn't this MACH_SUNXI...? -- ~Vinod
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-01-31 04:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <t5xsu-437-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1569895 |
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 02:23:55AM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote: > > > 31.01.2017, 00:41, "Vinod Koul" <vinod.koul@intel.com>: > > On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 10:33:29AM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote: > >> As 64-bit Allwinner H5 SoC has the same DMA engine with H3, the DMA > >> driver should be allowed to be built for ARM64, in order to make it work on H5. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@aosc.xyz> > >> Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> > >> Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org> > >> --- > >> Patch introduced between v1 and v2, to satisfy the newly added H3/H5 audio > >> codec support. > >> > >> drivers/dma/Kconfig | 2 +- > >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/dma/Kconfig b/drivers/dma/Kconfig > >> index 0d6a96ee9fc7..d01d59812cf3 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/dma/Kconfig > >> +++ b/drivers/dma/Kconfig > >> @@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ config DMA_SUN4I > >> > >> config DMA_SUN6I > >> tristate "Allwinner A31 SoCs DMA support" > >> - depends on MACH_SUN6I || MACH_SUN8I || COMPILE_TEST > >> + depends on MACH_SUN6I || MACH_SUN8I || (ARM64 && ARCH_SUNXI) || COMPILE_TEST > > > > Do we really need ARM64 here? also looking at others I wonder why isn't > > this MACH_SUNXI...? > > You mean directly place "ARCH_SUNXI" here? > > SUN4I/SUN5I/SUN7I do not use DMA_SUN6I, they have different DMA > controllers. No my question was different.. We have MACH_SUNxx for 6I and 8I, so why do we have ARCH_SUNXI and if its an arch SUNXI, X means it can take any value... This schema looks pretty confusing while reading Also I had a question on usage of ARM64.. -- ~Vinod
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web