Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1570292
| From | Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 08/10] dmaengine: sun6i: allow build on ARM64 platforms (sun50i) |
| Date | 2017-01-31 04:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <t5xsu-437-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <t59gu-6em-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <t5nt8-6kA-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <t5nt8-6kA-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <t5xsu-437-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 02:23:55AM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote: > > > 31.01.2017, 00:41, "Vinod Koul" <vinod.koul@intel.com>: > > On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 10:33:29AM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote: > >> As 64-bit Allwinner H5 SoC has the same DMA engine with H3, the DMA > >> driver should be allowed to be built for ARM64, in order to make it work on H5. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@aosc.xyz> > >> Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> > >> Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org> > >> --- > >> Patch introduced between v1 and v2, to satisfy the newly added H3/H5 audio > >> codec support. > >> > >> drivers/dma/Kconfig | 2 +- > >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/dma/Kconfig b/drivers/dma/Kconfig > >> index 0d6a96ee9fc7..d01d59812cf3 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/dma/Kconfig > >> +++ b/drivers/dma/Kconfig > >> @@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ config DMA_SUN4I > >> > >> config DMA_SUN6I > >> tristate "Allwinner A31 SoCs DMA support" > >> - depends on MACH_SUN6I || MACH_SUN8I || COMPILE_TEST > >> + depends on MACH_SUN6I || MACH_SUN8I || (ARM64 && ARCH_SUNXI) || COMPILE_TEST > > > > Do we really need ARM64 here? also looking at others I wonder why isn't > > this MACH_SUNXI...? > > You mean directly place "ARCH_SUNXI" here? > > SUN4I/SUN5I/SUN7I do not use DMA_SUN6I, they have different DMA > controllers. No my question was different.. We have MACH_SUNxx for 6I and 8I, so why do we have ARCH_SUNXI and if its an arch SUNXI, X means it can take any value... This schema looks pretty confusing while reading Also I had a question on usage of ARM64.. -- ~Vinod
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH v3 08/10] dmaengine: sun6i: allow build on ARM64 platforms (sun50i) Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com> - 2017-01-30 18:00 +0100 Re: [PATCH v3 08/10] dmaengine: sun6i: allow build on ARM64 platforms (sun50i) Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com> - 2017-01-31 04:40 +0100
csiph-web