Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1569397 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Shailendra Verma <shailendra.v@samsung.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-01-30 06:20 +0100 |
| Last post | 2017-01-30 09:00 +0100 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
[PATCH] Memory - Fix possible NULL derefrence. Shailendra Verma <shailendra.v@samsung.com> - 2017-01-30 06:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH] Memory - Fix possible NULL derefrence. Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> - 2017-01-30 09:00 +0100
| From | Shailendra Verma <shailendra.v@samsung.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-01-30 06:20 +0100 |
| Subject | [PATCH] Memory - Fix possible NULL derefrence. |
| Message-ID | <t5cxI-8lg-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
of_device_get_match_data could return NULL, and so can cause
a NULL pointer dereference later.
Signed-off-by: Shailendra Verma <shailendra.v@samsung.com>
---
drivers/memory/atmel-sdramc.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/memory/atmel-sdramc.c b/drivers/memory/atmel-sdramc.c
index 12080b0..cb63fbe 100644
--- a/drivers/memory/atmel-sdramc.c
+++ b/drivers/memory/atmel-sdramc.c
@@ -57,6 +57,10 @@ static int atmel_ramc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
struct clk *clk;
caps = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
+ if (!caps) {
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "no device match found\n");
+ return -ENODEV;
+ }
if (caps->has_ddrck) {
clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "ddrck");
--
1.7.9.5
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-01-30 09:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <t5f2x-1hX-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1569397 |
On 30/01/2017 at 10:30:05 +0530, Shailendra Verma wrote: > of_device_get_match_data could return NULL, and so can cause > a NULL pointer dereference later. > No, it will never return NULL because it will always match. At some point, I would really like people to stop blindly sending patches generated by coccinelle. -- Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web