Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1564135 > unrolled thread

[PATCH] powerpc/sstep: Return directly after a failed address_ok() in emulate_step()

Started bySF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
First post2017-01-21 15:50 +0100
Last post2017-01-27 01:50 +0100
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  [PATCH] powerpc/sstep: Return directly after a failed address_ok() in  emulate_step() SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2017-01-21 15:50 +0100
    Re: powerpc/sstep: Return directly after a failed address_ok() in emulate_step() Michael Ellerman <patch-notifications@ellerman.id.au> - 2017-01-27 01:50 +0100

#1564135 — [PATCH] powerpc/sstep: Return directly after a failed address_ok() in emulate_step()

FromSF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Date2017-01-21 15:50 +0100
Subject[PATCH] powerpc/sstep: Return directly after a failed address_ok() in emulate_step()
Message-ID<t259n-59n-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2017 15:30:15 +0100

* Return directly after a call of the function "address_ok" failed
  in a case block.

  This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.

* Delete two error code assignments which became unnecessary with
  this refactoring.

Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
---
 arch/powerpc/lib/sstep.c | 6 ++----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/lib/sstep.c b/arch/powerpc/lib/sstep.c
index 9c78a9c102c3..c33519c25b47 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/lib/sstep.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/lib/sstep.c
@@ -1803,9 +1803,8 @@ int __kprobes emulate_step(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int instr)
 			return 0;
 		if (op.ea & (size - 1))
 			break;		/* can't handle misaligned */
-		err = -EFAULT;
 		if (!address_ok(regs, op.ea, size))
-			goto ldst_done;
+			return 0;
 		err = 0;
 		switch (size) {
 		case 4:
@@ -1828,9 +1827,8 @@ int __kprobes emulate_step(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int instr)
 			return 0;
 		if (op.ea & (size - 1))
 			break;		/* can't handle misaligned */
-		err = -EFAULT;
 		if (!address_ok(regs, op.ea, size))
-			goto ldst_done;
+			return 0;
 		err = 0;
 		switch (size) {
 		case 4:
-- 
2.11.0

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1567840 — Re: powerpc/sstep: Return directly after a failed address_ok() in emulate_step()

FromMichael Ellerman <patch-notifications@ellerman.id.au>
Date2017-01-27 01:50 +0100
SubjectRe: powerpc/sstep: Return directly after a failed address_ok() in emulate_step()
Message-ID<t42TM-5O4-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1564135
On Sat, 2017-01-21 at 14:45:19 UTC, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2017 15:30:15 +0100
> 
> * Return directly after a call of the function "address_ok" failed
>   in a case block.
> 
>   This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
> 
> * Delete two error code assignments which became unnecessary with
>   this refactoring.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>

Applied to powerpc next, thanks.

https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/3c4b66a6d0d2b9f2418f9a09d528e4

cheers

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web