Re: powerpc/sstep: Return directly after a failed address_ok() in emulate_step()

From	Michael Ellerman <patch-notifications@ellerman.id.au>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: powerpc/sstep: Return directly after a failed address_ok() in emulate_step()
Date	2017-01-27 01:50 +0100
Message-ID	<t42TM-5O4-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<t259n-59n-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Sat, 2017-01-21 at 14:45:19 UTC, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2017 15:30:15 +0100
> 
> * Return directly after a call of the function "address_ok" failed
>   in a case block.
> 
>   This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
> 
> * Delete two error code assignments which became unnecessary with
>   this refactoring.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>

Applied to powerpc next, thanks.

https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/3c4b66a6d0d2b9f2418f9a09d528e4

cheers

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[PATCH] powerpc/sstep: Return directly after a failed address_ok() in  emulate_step() SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2017-01-21 15:50 +0100
  Re: powerpc/sstep: Return directly after a failed address_ok() in emulate_step() Michael Ellerman <patch-notifications@ellerman.id.au> - 2017-01-27 01:50 +0100

csiph-web