Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1560014 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH v3 8/13] arm64: allwinner: a64: Add MMC nodes

Started byCorentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com>
First post2017-01-16 20:40 +0100
Last post2017-01-25 10:20 +0100
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH v3 8/13] arm64: allwinner: a64: Add MMC nodes Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com> - 2017-01-16 20:40 +0100
    Re: [PATCH v3 8/13] arm64: allwinner: a64: Add MMC nodes Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> - 2017-01-25 10:20 +0100

#1560014 — Re: [PATCH v3 8/13] arm64: allwinner: a64: Add MMC nodes

FromCorentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com>
Date2017-01-16 20:40 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 8/13] arm64: allwinner: a64: Add MMC nodes
Message-ID<t0lii-54V-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 05:56:58PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> From: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
> 
> The A64 has 3 MMC controllers, one of them being especially targeted to
> eMMC. Among other things, it has a data strobe signal and a 8 bits data
> width.
> 
> The two other are more usual controllers that will have a 4 bits width at
> most and no data strobe signal, which limits it to more usual SD or MMC
> peripherals.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi
> index 99b6bb1e141c..143e9706438f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi
> @@ -299,6 +299,45 @@
>  			#size-cells = <0>;
>  		};
>  
> +		mmc0: mmc@1c0f000 {
> +			compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-a64-mmc";
> +			reg = <0x01c0f000 0x1000>;
> +			clocks = <&ccu CLK_BUS_MMC0>, <&ccu CLK_MMC0>;
> +			clock-names = "ahb", "mmc";
> +			resets = <&ccu RST_BUS_MMC0>;
> +			reset-names = "ahb";
> +			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 60 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> +			status = "disabled";
> +			#address-cells = <1>;
> +			#size-cells = <0>;
> +		};
> +
> +		mmc1: mmc@1c10000 {
> +			compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-a64-mmc";
> +			reg = <0x01c10000 0x1000>;
> +			clocks = <&ccu CLK_BUS_MMC1>, <&ccu CLK_MMC1>;
> +			clock-names = "ahb", "mmc";
> +			resets = <&ccu RST_BUS_MMC1>;
> +			reset-names = "ahb";
> +			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 61 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> +			status = "disabled";
> +			#address-cells = <1>;
> +			#size-cells = <0>;
> +		};
> +
> +		mmc2: mmc@1c11000 {
> +			compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-a64-emmc";
> +			reg = <0x01c11000 0x1000>;
> +			clocks = <&ccu CLK_BUS_MMC2>, <&ccu CLK_MMC2>;
> +			clock-names = "ahb", "mmc";
> +			resets = <&ccu RST_BUS_MMC2>;
> +			reset-names = "ahb";
> +			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 62 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> +			status = "disabled";
> +			#address-cells = <1>;
> +			#size-cells = <0>;
> +		};
> +
>  		gic: interrupt-controller@1c81000 {
>  			compatible = "arm,gic-400";
>  			reg = <0x01c81000 0x1000>,

Hello

It seems that mmc node is after i2c@1c2b400 so not in address order.

Regards
Corentin Labbe

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1566397

FromMaxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Date2017-01-25 10:20 +0100
Message-ID<t3rUd-8k5-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1560014

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Hi Corentin,

On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 08:16:41PM +0100, Corentin Labbe wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 05:56:58PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > From: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
> > 
> > The A64 has 3 MMC controllers, one of them being especially targeted to
> > eMMC. Among other things, it has a data strobe signal and a 8 bits data
> > width.
> > 
> > The two other are more usual controllers that will have a 4 bits width at
> > most and no data strobe signal, which limits it to more usual SD or MMC
> > peripherals.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi
> > index 99b6bb1e141c..143e9706438f 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi
> > @@ -299,6 +299,45 @@
> >  			#size-cells = <0>;
> >  		};
> >  
> > +		mmc0: mmc@1c0f000 {
> > +			compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-a64-mmc";
> > +			reg = <0x01c0f000 0x1000>;
> > +			clocks = <&ccu CLK_BUS_MMC0>, <&ccu CLK_MMC0>;
> > +			clock-names = "ahb", "mmc";
> > +			resets = <&ccu RST_BUS_MMC0>;
> > +			reset-names = "ahb";
> > +			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 60 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > +			status = "disabled";
> > +			#address-cells = <1>;
> > +			#size-cells = <0>;
> > +		};
> > +
> > +		mmc1: mmc@1c10000 {
> > +			compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-a64-mmc";
> > +			reg = <0x01c10000 0x1000>;
> > +			clocks = <&ccu CLK_BUS_MMC1>, <&ccu CLK_MMC1>;
> > +			clock-names = "ahb", "mmc";
> > +			resets = <&ccu RST_BUS_MMC1>;
> > +			reset-names = "ahb";
> > +			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 61 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > +			status = "disabled";
> > +			#address-cells = <1>;
> > +			#size-cells = <0>;
> > +		};
> > +
> > +		mmc2: mmc@1c11000 {
> > +			compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-a64-emmc";
> > +			reg = <0x01c11000 0x1000>;
> > +			clocks = <&ccu CLK_BUS_MMC2>, <&ccu CLK_MMC2>;
> > +			clock-names = "ahb", "mmc";
> > +			resets = <&ccu RST_BUS_MMC2>;
> > +			reset-names = "ahb";
> > +			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 62 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > +			status = "disabled";
> > +			#address-cells = <1>;
> > +			#size-cells = <0>;
> > +		};
> > +
> >  		gic: interrupt-controller@1c81000 {
> >  			compatible = "arm,gic-400";
> >  			reg = <0x01c81000 0x1000>,
> 
> Hello
> 
> It seems that mmc node is after i2c@1c2b400 so not in address order.

You're right, I'll fix this in the v3.

Thanks!
Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web