Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1512052 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@leemhuis.info> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-10-30 13:10 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-11-03 06:20 +0100 |
| Articles | 5 — 4 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: 4.9-rc1 boot regression, ambiguous bisect result Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@leemhuis.info> - 2016-10-30 13:10 +0100
Re: 4.9-rc1 boot regression, ambiguous bisect result Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2016-10-30 17:10 +0100
Re: 4.9-rc1 boot regression, ambiguous bisect result Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> - 2016-10-31 10:40 +0100
Re: 4.9-rc1 boot regression, ambiguous bisect result "Neri, Ricardo" <ricardo.neri@intel.com> - 2016-11-03 01:50 +0100
Re: 4.9-rc1 boot regression, ambiguous bisect result Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2016-11-03 06:20 +0100
| From | Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@leemhuis.info> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-30 13:10 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: 4.9-rc1 boot regression, ambiguous bisect result |
| Message-ID | <sxX62-4sU-21@gated-at.bofh.it> |
JFYI: I added this report to the list of regressions for Linux 4.9. I'll watch this thread for further updates on this issue to document progress in my weekly reports. Please let me know via regressions@leemhuis.info in case the discussion moves to a different place (bugzilla or another mail thread for example). tia! Current status (afaics) in my report: This looks stuck. Or was is discussed (or even fixed) somewhere else? Ciao, Thorsten On 22.10.2016 01:20, Dan Williams wrote: > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 1:20 PM, Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> wrote: >> On Fri, 21 Oct, at 04:41:29PM, Matt Fleming wrote: >>> >>> FYI, I've been able to reproduce some crash when using your EFI memory >>> map layout under Qemu and forcing the ESRT driver to reserve the space. >> >> Nope, that was a bug in my hack. I can't get Qemu to crash while using >> your memory map layout. >> >> Any chance you can insert "while(1)" loops into the EFI boot paths for >> a kernel that is known to reboot or trigger a triple fault in kernels >> that hang, so that we can narrow in on the issue. See, >> >> http://www.codeblueprint.co.uk/2015/04/early-x86-linux-boot-debug-tricks.html > > I can take a look, but it will not be until Monday when I have > physical access to the system again. > > http://news.gmane.org/find-root.php?message_id=CAPcyv4jkVcBwecxwt1P+p-fMSuen9B9xHEVf0BjM5uJZ4_jAdw%40mail.gmail.com > http://mid.gmane.org/CAPcyv4jkVcBwecxwt1P+p-fMSuen9B9xHEVf0BjM5uJZ4_jAdw%40mail.gmail.com >
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-30 17:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sy0Qh-6QV-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1512052 |
On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 5:08 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@leemhuis.info> wrote: > JFYI: I added this report to the list of regressions for Linux 4.9. I'll > watch this thread for further updates on this issue to document progress > in my weekly reports. Please let me know via regressions@leemhuis.info > in case the discussion moves to a different place (bugzilla or another > mail thread for example). tia! > > Current status (afaics) in my report: This looks stuck. Or was is > discussed (or even fixed) somewhere else? Thanks, and no, not fixed yet. I've not found the time to run the experiments Matt needs, but a colleague has offered to look into it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-31 10:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <syheq-us-23@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1512096 |
On Sun, 30 Oct, at 08:59:58AM, Dan Williams wrote: > On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 5:08 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis > <regressions@leemhuis.info> wrote: > > JFYI: I added this report to the list of regressions for Linux 4.9. I'll > > watch this thread for further updates on this issue to document progress > > in my weekly reports. Please let me know via regressions@leemhuis.info > > in case the discussion moves to a different place (bugzilla or another > > mail thread for example). tia! > > > > Current status (afaics) in my report: This looks stuck. Or was is > > discussed (or even fixed) somewhere else? > > Thanks, and no, not fixed yet. I've not found the time to run the > experiments Matt needs, but a colleague has offered to look into it. Of course, if you are willing to help with debugging, Thorsten, it would be much appreciated and this bug might get fixed sooner.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Neri, Ricardo" <ricardo.neri@intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-03 01:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <szeo9-55A-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1512096 |
On Sun, 2016-10-30 at 08:59 -0700, Dan Williams wrote: > On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 5:08 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis > <regressions@leemhuis.info> wrote: > > JFYI: I added this report to the list of regressions for Linux 4.9. I'll > > watch this thread for further updates on this issue to document progress > > in my weekly reports. Please let me know via regressions@leemhuis.info > > in case the discussion moves to a different place (bugzilla or another > > mail thread for example). tia! > > > > Current status (afaics) in my report: This looks stuck. Or was is > > discussed (or even fixed) somewhere else? > > Thanks, and no, not fixed yet. I've not found the time to run the > experiments Matt needs, but a colleague has offered to look into it. > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Dan, was there a special configuration that you enabled for this bug? The person working on the bug can't reproduce the bug in v4.9-rc1 or v4.9-rc3.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-03 06:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sziBs-7YG-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1514224 |
On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 5:41 PM, Neri, Ricardo <ricardo.neri@intel.com> wrote: > On Sun, 2016-10-30 at 08:59 -0700, Dan Williams wrote: >> On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 5:08 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis >> <regressions@leemhuis.info> wrote: >> > JFYI: I added this report to the list of regressions for Linux 4.9. I'll >> > watch this thread for further updates on this issue to document progress >> > in my weekly reports. Please let me know via regressions@leemhuis.info >> > in case the discussion moves to a different place (bugzilla or another >> > mail thread for example). tia! >> > >> > Current status (afaics) in my report: This looks stuck. Or was is >> > discussed (or even fixed) somewhere else? >> >> Thanks, and no, not fixed yet. I've not found the time to run the >> experiments Matt needs, but a colleague has offered to look into it. >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > Dan, was there a special configuration that you enabled for this bug? > The person working on the bug can't reproduce the bug in v4.9-rc1 or > v4.9-rc3. I am pxe-booting the platform to an nfs root filesystem.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web