Re: 4.9-rc1 boot regression, ambiguous bisect result

From	Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: 4.9-rc1 boot regression, ambiguous bisect result
Date	2016-10-31 10:40 +0100
Message-ID	<syheq-us-23@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	(4 earlier) <suKf0-7AT-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <suOBY-2ad-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <suRq9-3X6-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <sxX62-4sU-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <sy0Qh-6QV-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Sun, 30 Oct, at 08:59:58AM, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 5:08 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis
> <regressions@leemhuis.info> wrote:
> > JFYI: I added this report to the list of regressions for Linux 4.9. I'll
> > watch this thread for further updates on this issue to document progress
> > in my weekly reports. Please let me know via regressions@leemhuis.info
> > in case the discussion moves to a different place (bugzilla or another
> > mail thread for example). tia!
> >
> > Current status (afaics) in my report: This looks stuck. Or was is
> > discussed (or even fixed) somewhere else?
> 
> Thanks, and no, not fixed yet. I've not found the time to run the
> experiments Matt needs, but a colleague has offered to look into it.

Of course, if you are willing to help with debugging, Thorsten, it
would be much appreciated and this bug might get fixed sooner.

Thread

Re: 4.9-rc1 boot regression, ambiguous bisect result Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@leemhuis.info> - 2016-10-30 13:10 +0100
  Re: 4.9-rc1 boot regression, ambiguous bisect result Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2016-10-30 17:10 +0100
    Re: 4.9-rc1 boot regression, ambiguous bisect result Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> - 2016-10-31 10:40 +0100
    Re: 4.9-rc1 boot regression, ambiguous bisect result "Neri, Ricardo" <ricardo.neri@intel.com> - 2016-11-03 01:50 +0100
      Re: 4.9-rc1 boot regression, ambiguous bisect result Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2016-11-03 06:20 +0100

csiph-web