Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1497924 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Anand Moon <linux.amoon@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-10-09 17:00 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-10-10 16:20 +0200 |
| Articles | 9 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[PATCH 1/2] host: ehci-exynos: Convert to use the SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS Anand Moon <linux.amoon@gmail.com> - 2016-10-09 17:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] host: ehci-exynos: Convert to use the SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> - 2016-10-09 18:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] host: ehci-exynos: Convert to use the SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS Anand Moon <linux.amoon@gmail.com> - 2016-10-09 19:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] host: ehci-exynos: Convert to use the SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> - 2016-10-09 19:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] host: ehci-exynos: Convert to use the SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS Anand Moon <linux.amoon@gmail.com> - 2016-10-09 20:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] host: ehci-exynos: Convert to use the SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> - 2016-10-09 21:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] host: ehci-exynos: Convert to use the SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS Anand Moon <linux.amoon@gmail.com> - 2016-10-09 21:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] host: ehci-exynos: Convert to use the SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2016-10-09 23:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] host: ehci-exynos: Convert to use the SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS Anand Moon <linux.amoon@gmail.com> - 2016-10-10 16:20 +0200
| From | Anand Moon <linux.amoon@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-09 17:00 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH 1/2] host: ehci-exynos: Convert to use the SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS |
| Message-ID | <sqnAl-5tK-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Move the ehci-exynos system PM callbacks within #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
as to avoid them being build when not used. This also allows us to use the
SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS macro which simplifies the code.
Signed-off-by: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@gmail.com>
---
drivers/usb/host/ehci-exynos.c | 14 ++++++--------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-exynos.c b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-exynos.c
index 42e5b66..1899900 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-exynos.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-exynos.c
@@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ static int exynos_ehci_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
return 0;
}
-#ifdef CONFIG_PM
+#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
static int exynos_ehci_suspend(struct device *dev)
{
struct usb_hcd *hcd = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
@@ -292,15 +292,13 @@ static int exynos_ehci_resume(struct device *dev)
ehci_resume(hcd, false);
return 0;
}
-#else
-#define exynos_ehci_suspend NULL
-#define exynos_ehci_resume NULL
-#endif
static const struct dev_pm_ops exynos_ehci_pm_ops = {
- .suspend = exynos_ehci_suspend,
- .resume = exynos_ehci_resume,
+ SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(exynos_ehci_suspend, exynos_ehci_resume)
};
+#endif /* CONFIG_PM_SLEEP */
+
+#define DEV_PM_OPS IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PM_SLEEP) ? &exynos_ehci_pm_ops : NULL
#ifdef CONFIG_OF
static const struct of_device_id exynos_ehci_match[] = {
@@ -317,7 +315,7 @@ static struct platform_driver exynos_ehci_driver = {
.shutdown = usb_hcd_platform_shutdown,
.driver = {
.name = "exynos-ehci",
- .pm = &exynos_ehci_pm_ops,
+ .pm = DEV_PM_OPS,
.of_match_table = of_match_ptr(exynos_ehci_match),
}
};
--
2.7.4
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-09 18:40 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/2] host: ehci-exynos: Convert to use the SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS |
| Message-ID | <sqpiN-6z5-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1497924 |
On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 02:34:14PM +0000, Anand Moon wrote:
> Move the ehci-exynos system PM callbacks within #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> as to avoid them being build when not used. This also allows us to use the
> SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS macro which simplifies the code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/usb/host/ehci-exynos.c | 14 ++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-exynos.c b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-exynos.c
> index 42e5b66..1899900 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-exynos.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-exynos.c
> @@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ static int exynos_ehci_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_PM
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
Does not look like an equivalent change. How will it behave in a config
with !SUSPEND && !HIBERNATE && PM?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
> static int exynos_ehci_suspend(struct device *dev)
> {
> struct usb_hcd *hcd = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> @@ -292,15 +292,13 @@ static int exynos_ehci_resume(struct device *dev)
> ehci_resume(hcd, false);
> return 0;
> }
> -#else
> -#define exynos_ehci_suspend NULL
> -#define exynos_ehci_resume NULL
> -#endif
>
> static const struct dev_pm_ops exynos_ehci_pm_ops = {
> - .suspend = exynos_ehci_suspend,
> - .resume = exynos_ehci_resume,
> + SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(exynos_ehci_suspend, exynos_ehci_resume)
> };
> +#endif /* CONFIG_PM_SLEEP */
> +
> +#define DEV_PM_OPS IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PM_SLEEP) ? &exynos_ehci_pm_ops : NULL
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_OF
> static const struct of_device_id exynos_ehci_match[] = {
> @@ -317,7 +315,7 @@ static struct platform_driver exynos_ehci_driver = {
> .shutdown = usb_hcd_platform_shutdown,
> .driver = {
> .name = "exynos-ehci",
> - .pm = &exynos_ehci_pm_ops,
> + .pm = DEV_PM_OPS,
> .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(exynos_ehci_match),
> }
> };
> --
> 2.7.4
>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Anand Moon <linux.amoon@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-09 19:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <sqpVv-71r-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1497977 |
Hi Krzysztof, On 9 October 2016 at 22:04, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote: > On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 02:34:14PM +0000, Anand Moon wrote: >> Move the ehci-exynos system PM callbacks within #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP >> as to avoid them being build when not used. This also allows us to use the >> SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS macro which simplifies the code. >> >> Signed-off-by: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@gmail.com> >> --- >> drivers/usb/host/ehci-exynos.c | 14 ++++++-------- >> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-exynos.c b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-exynos.c >> index 42e5b66..1899900 100644 >> --- a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-exynos.c >> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-exynos.c >> @@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ static int exynos_ehci_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) >> return 0; >> } >> >> -#ifdef CONFIG_PM >> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP > > Does not look like an equivalent change. How will it behave in a config > with !SUSPEND && !HIBERNATE && PM? > [snip] I just wanted to update suspend and resume callback to use SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS as they are define under CONFIG_PM_SLEEP so I update above to avoid compilation warning/error. http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/include/linux/pm.h#L321 -Best Regards Anand Moon
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-09 19:30 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/2] host: ehci-exynos: Convert to use the SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS |
| Message-ID | <sqq5c-74J-21@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1497984 |
On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 10:45:40PM +0530, Anand Moon wrote: > Hi Krzysztof, > > On 9 October 2016 at 22:04, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 02:34:14PM +0000, Anand Moon wrote: > >> Move the ehci-exynos system PM callbacks within #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP > >> as to avoid them being build when not used. This also allows us to use the > >> SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS macro which simplifies the code. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@gmail.com> > >> --- > >> drivers/usb/host/ehci-exynos.c | 14 ++++++-------- > >> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-exynos.c b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-exynos.c > >> index 42e5b66..1899900 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-exynos.c > >> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-exynos.c > >> @@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ static int exynos_ehci_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) > >> return 0; > >> } > >> > >> -#ifdef CONFIG_PM > >> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP > > > > Does not look like an equivalent change. How will it behave in a config > > with !SUSPEND && !HIBERNATE && PM? > > > > [snip] > > I just wanted to update suspend and resume callback to use > SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS > as they are define under CONFIG_PM_SLEEP so I update above to avoid > compilation warning/error. First of all you did not answer to my question, so let me rephrase into two: 1. Is the code equivalent? 2. What will be the output with !SUSPEND && !HIBERNATE && PM? You didn't mention compilation warning/error in message commit so I do not know what you are thinking about... Best regards, Krzysztof
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Anand Moon <linux.amoon@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-09 20:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <sqr1g-7Hk-23@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1497985 |
hi Krzysztof, On 9 October 2016 at 22:57, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote: > On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 10:45:40PM +0530, Anand Moon wrote: >> Hi Krzysztof, >> >> On 9 October 2016 at 22:04, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote: >> > On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 02:34:14PM +0000, Anand Moon wrote: >> >> Move the ehci-exynos system PM callbacks within #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP >> >> as to avoid them being build when not used. This also allows us to use the >> >> SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS macro which simplifies the code. >> >> >> >> Signed-off-by: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@gmail.com> >> >> --- >> >> drivers/usb/host/ehci-exynos.c | 14 ++++++-------- >> >> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) >> >> >> >> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-exynos.c b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-exynos.c >> >> index 42e5b66..1899900 100644 >> >> --- a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-exynos.c >> >> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-exynos.c >> >> @@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ static int exynos_ehci_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) >> >> return 0; >> >> } >> >> >> >> -#ifdef CONFIG_PM >> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP >> > >> > Does not look like an equivalent change. How will it behave in a config >> > with !SUSPEND && !HIBERNATE && PM? >> > >> >> [snip] >> >> I just wanted to update suspend and resume callback to use >> SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS >> as they are define under CONFIG_PM_SLEEP so I update above to avoid >> compilation warning/error. > Apologize: for not understanding your question. > First of all you did not answer to my question, so let me rephrase into > two: > 1. Is the code equivalent? No CONFIG_PM and CONFIG_PM_SLEEP are different options. But I could not disable CONFIG_PM_SLEEP option with either in exynos_defconfig CONFIG_PM_SLEEP=n or # CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is not set > 2. What will be the output with !SUSPEND && !HIBERNATE && PM? # # Power management options # # CONFIG_SUSPEND is not set # CONFIG_HIBERNATION is not set # CONFIG_PM is not set When CONFIG_SUSPEND and CONFIG_HIBERNATION are not set CONFIG_PM is disabled and so is CONFIG_PM_SLEEP. Best Regards -Anand Moon > > You didn't mention compilation warning/error in message commit so I do > not know what you are thinking about... > > Best regards, > Krzysztof
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-09 21:00 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/2] host: ehci-exynos: Convert to use the SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS |
| Message-ID | <sqruh-7Ru-21@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1497992 |
On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 11:57:59PM +0530, Anand Moon wrote: > hi Krzysztof, > > On 9 October 2016 at 22:57, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 10:45:40PM +0530, Anand Moon wrote: > >> Hi Krzysztof, > >> > >> On 9 October 2016 at 22:04, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote: > >> > On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 02:34:14PM +0000, Anand Moon wrote: > >> >> Move the ehci-exynos system PM callbacks within #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP > >> >> as to avoid them being build when not used. This also allows us to use the > >> >> SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS macro which simplifies the code. > >> >> > >> >> Signed-off-by: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@gmail.com> > >> >> --- > >> >> drivers/usb/host/ehci-exynos.c | 14 ++++++-------- > >> >> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > >> >> > >> >> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-exynos.c b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-exynos.c > >> >> index 42e5b66..1899900 100644 > >> >> --- a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-exynos.c > >> >> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-exynos.c > >> >> @@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ static int exynos_ehci_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) > >> >> return 0; > >> >> } > >> >> > >> >> -#ifdef CONFIG_PM > >> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP > >> > > >> > Does not look like an equivalent change. How will it behave in a config > >> > with !SUSPEND && !HIBERNATE && PM? > >> > > >> > >> [snip] > >> > >> I just wanted to update suspend and resume callback to use > >> SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS > >> as they are define under CONFIG_PM_SLEEP so I update above to avoid > >> compilation warning/error. > > > Apologize: for not understanding your question. > > > First of all you did not answer to my question, so let me rephrase into > > two: > > 1. Is the code equivalent? > > No CONFIG_PM and CONFIG_PM_SLEEP are different options. > But I could not disable CONFIG_PM_SLEEP option with either in exynos_defconfig So the code is not equivalent... > > CONFIG_PM_SLEEP=n or > # CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is not set > > > 2. What will be the output with !SUSPEND && !HIBERNATE && PM? > > # > # Power management options > # > # CONFIG_SUSPEND is not set > # CONFIG_HIBERNATION is not set > # CONFIG_PM is not set > > When CONFIG_SUSPEND and CONFIG_HIBERNATION are not set > CONFIG_PM is disabled and so is CONFIG_PM_SLEEP. In my config, the CONFIG_PM was enabled thus the code changes the functionality... Maybe this was intented but I really don't get it from the commit message or from your explanations here. Krzysztof
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Anand Moon <linux.amoon@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-09 21:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <sqrND-8d3-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1497997 |
hi Krzysztof, On 10 October 2016 at 00:09, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote: > On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 11:57:59PM +0530, Anand Moon wrote: >> hi Krzysztof, >> >> On 9 October 2016 at 22:57, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote: >> > On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 10:45:40PM +0530, Anand Moon wrote: >> >> Hi Krzysztof, >> >> >> >> On 9 October 2016 at 22:04, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote: >> >> > On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 02:34:14PM +0000, Anand Moon wrote: >> >> >> Move the ehci-exynos system PM callbacks within #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP >> >> >> as to avoid them being build when not used. This also allows us to use the >> >> >> SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS macro which simplifies the code. >> >> >> >> >> >> Signed-off-by: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@gmail.com> >> >> >> --- >> >> >> drivers/usb/host/ehci-exynos.c | 14 ++++++-------- >> >> >> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) >> >> >> >> >> >> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-exynos.c b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-exynos.c >> >> >> index 42e5b66..1899900 100644 >> >> >> --- a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-exynos.c >> >> >> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-exynos.c >> >> >> @@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ static int exynos_ehci_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) >> >> >> return 0; >> >> >> } >> >> >> >> >> >> -#ifdef CONFIG_PM >> >> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP >> >> > >> >> > Does not look like an equivalent change. How will it behave in a config >> >> > with !SUSPEND && !HIBERNATE && PM? >> >> > >> >> >> >> [snip] >> >> >> >> I just wanted to update suspend and resume callback to use >> >> SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS >> >> as they are define under CONFIG_PM_SLEEP so I update above to avoid >> >> compilation warning/error. >> > >> Apologize: for not understanding your question. >> >> > First of all you did not answer to my question, so let me rephrase into >> > two: >> > 1. Is the code equivalent? >> >> No CONFIG_PM and CONFIG_PM_SLEEP are different options. >> But I could not disable CONFIG_PM_SLEEP option with either in exynos_defconfig > > So the code is not equivalent... > >> >> CONFIG_PM_SLEEP=n or >> # CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is not set >> >> > 2. What will be the output with !SUSPEND && !HIBERNATE && PM? >> >> # >> # Power management options >> # >> # CONFIG_SUSPEND is not set >> # CONFIG_HIBERNATION is not set >> # CONFIG_PM is not set >> >> When CONFIG_SUSPEND and CONFIG_HIBERNATION are not set >> CONFIG_PM is disabled and so is CONFIG_PM_SLEEP. > > In my config, the CONFIG_PM was enabled thus the code changes the > functionality... Maybe this was intented but I really don't get it from > the commit message or from your explanations here. > > Krzysztof Ok I will keep the changes to use CONFIG_PM, but use the SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS option in V2 patch. Is that ok. -Best Regards -Anand Moon
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-09 23:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <sqtFL-RQ-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1497977 |
On Sun, 9 Oct 2016, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 02:34:14PM +0000, Anand Moon wrote: > > Move the ehci-exynos system PM callbacks within #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP > > as to avoid them being build when not used. This also allows us to use the > > SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS macro which simplifies the code. > > > > Signed-off-by: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@gmail.com> > > --- > > drivers/usb/host/ehci-exynos.c | 14 ++++++-------- > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-exynos.c b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-exynos.c > > index 42e5b66..1899900 100644 > > --- a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-exynos.c > > +++ b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-exynos.c > > @@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ static int exynos_ehci_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) > > return 0; > > } > > > > -#ifdef CONFIG_PM > > +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP > > Does not look like an equivalent change. How will it behave in a config > with !SUSPEND && !HIBERNATE && PM? It's hard to say what Anand originally had in mind. To me, it looks like it will behave exactly the same as before, the only difference being that the object image will not contain unused exynos_ehci_suspend and exynos_ehci_resume routines. And the compiler won't issue a warning at build time that the routines are unused. Alan Stern
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Anand Moon <linux.amoon@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-10 16:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <sqJAS-2hV-27@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1498015 |
hi Alan/Krzysztof, On 10 October 2016 at 02:47, Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> wrote: > On Sun, 9 Oct 2016, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >> On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 02:34:14PM +0000, Anand Moon wrote: >> > Move the ehci-exynos system PM callbacks within #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP >> > as to avoid them being build when not used. This also allows us to use the >> > SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS macro which simplifies the code. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@gmail.com> >> > --- >> > drivers/usb/host/ehci-exynos.c | 14 ++++++-------- >> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) >> > >> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-exynos.c b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-exynos.c >> > index 42e5b66..1899900 100644 >> > --- a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-exynos.c >> > +++ b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-exynos.c >> > @@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ static int exynos_ehci_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) >> > return 0; >> > } >> > >> > -#ifdef CONFIG_PM >> > +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP >> >> Does not look like an equivalent change. How will it behave in a config >> with !SUSPEND && !HIBERNATE && PM? > > It's hard to say what Anand originally had in mind. To me, it looks > like it will behave exactly the same as before, the only difference > being that the object image will not contain unused exynos_ehci_suspend > and exynos_ehci_resume routines. And the compiler won't issue a > warning at build time that the routines are unused. > > Alan Stern > Thanks for looking into this closely. I will just send one line changes to use SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS with better commit logs, if you people agree with this. Best Regards -Anand Moon
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web