Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1496767 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Samuele Baisi <ciccio87@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-10-06 19:00 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-10-07 10:40 +0200 |
| Articles | 3 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[PATCH] staging: lustre: lprocfs_status.h: fix sparse error: symbol redeclared with different type Samuele Baisi <ciccio87@gmail.com> - 2016-10-06 19:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] staging: lustre: lprocfs_status.h: fix sparse error: symbol redeclared with different type Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2016-10-07 06:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] staging: lustre: lprocfs_status.h: fix sparse error: symbol redeclared with different type Samuele Baisi <ciccio87@gmail.com> - 2016-10-07 10:40 +0200
| From | Samuele Baisi <ciccio87@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-06 19:00 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH] staging: lustre: lprocfs_status.h: fix sparse error: symbol redeclared with different type |
| Message-ID | <spkbx-35y-69@gated-at.bofh.it> |
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c:1554:5: error: symbol 'lprocfs_wr_root_squash' redeclared with different type (originally declared at drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/../include/lprocfs_status.h:704) - incompatible argument 1 (different address spaces) drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c:1618:5: error: symbol 'lprocfs_wr_nosquash_nids' redeclared with different type (originally declared at drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/../include/lprocfs_status.h:706) - incompatible argument 1 (different address spaces) Added __user annotation to the header definitions arguments (which are indeed userspace buffers). Signed-off-by: Samuele Baisi <ciccio87@gmail.com> --- drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lprocfs_status.h | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lprocfs_status.h b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lprocfs_status.h index cc0713e..b5c24ca 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lprocfs_status.h +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lprocfs_status.h @@ -701,9 +701,9 @@ static struct lustre_attr lustre_attr_##name = __ATTR(name, mode, show, store) extern const struct sysfs_ops lustre_sysfs_ops; struct root_squash_info; -int lprocfs_wr_root_squash(const char *buffer, unsigned long count, +int lprocfs_wr_root_squash(const char __user *buffer, unsigned long count, struct root_squash_info *squash, char *name); -int lprocfs_wr_nosquash_nids(const char *buffer, unsigned long count, +int lprocfs_wr_nosquash_nids(const char __user *buffer, unsigned long count, struct root_squash_info *squash, char *name); /* all quota proc functions */ -- 2.9.3
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-07 06:10 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] staging: lustre: lprocfs_status.h: fix sparse error: symbol redeclared with different type |
| Message-ID | <spuDU-2QL-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1496767 |
On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 06:52:07PM +0200, Samuele Baisi wrote: > drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c:1554:5: error: > symbol 'lprocfs_wr_root_squash' redeclared with different type (originally > declared at drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/../include/lprocfs_status.h:704) > - incompatible argument 1 (different address spaces) > > drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c:1618:5: error: > symbol 'lprocfs_wr_nosquash_nids' redeclared with different type (originally > declared at drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/../include/lprocfs_status.h:706) > - incompatible argument 1 (different address spaces) > > Added __user annotation to the header definitions arguments (which are > indeed userspace buffers). Are they really? Have you tested this? The last time this was looked at, it was a non-trivial problem... And any reason you didn't cc the lustre maintainers with this change? If you think it is correct, please resend it with the testing information and cc: them. thanks, greg k-h
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Samuele Baisi <ciccio87@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-07 10:40 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] staging: lustre: lprocfs_status.h: fix sparse error: symbol redeclared with different type |
| Message-ID | <spyRc-65a-29@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1496987 |
Il giorno ven 7 ott 2016 alle 5:55, Greg KH
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> ha scritto:
> On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 06:52:07PM +0200, Samuele Baisi wrote:
>> drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c:1554:5:
>> error:
>> symbol 'lprocfs_wr_root_squash' redeclared with different type
>> (originally
>> declared at
>> drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/../include/lprocfs_status.h:704)
>> - incompatible argument 1 (different address spaces)
>>
>> drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c:1618:5:
>> error:
>> symbol 'lprocfs_wr_nosquash_nids' redeclared with different type
>> (originally
>> declared at
>> drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/../include/lprocfs_status.h:706)
>> - incompatible argument 1 (different address spaces)
>>
>> Added __user annotation to the header definitions arguments (which
>> are
>> indeed userspace buffers).
>
> Are they really? Have you tested this? The last time this was looked
> at, it was a non-trivial problem...
No, I haven't really tested it, I just saw they're treated like
userspace
buffers (copy_from_user) in the function body.
if (copy_from_user(kernbuf, buffer, count)) {
errmsg = "bad address";
rc = -EFAULT;
goto failed_noprint;
}
if (copy_from_user(kernbuf, buffer, count)) {
errmsg = "bad address";
rc = -EFAULT;
goto failed;
}
> And any reason you didn't cc the lustre maintainers with this change?
> If you think it is correct, please resend it with the testing
> information and cc: them.
No, it was a mistake on my part, I thought to CC lustre-devel, but it
seems not to be
public access and then I forgot to add a Lustre mantainer.
Anyway, I do not think I'm going to have a chanche to really test it,
so it's probably
better to dismiss the matter.
Sorry for having wasted your time.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Thank you and best regards.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web