Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1491702 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH] arm64, numa: Add cpu_to_node() implementation.

Started byHanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
First post2016-09-27 08:30 +0200
Last post2016-10-06 11:20 +0200
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH] arm64, numa: Add cpu_to_node() implementation. Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> - 2016-09-27 08:30 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] arm64, numa: Add cpu_to_node() implementation. Robert Richter <rric@kernel.org> - 2016-10-06 11:20 +0200

#1491702 — Re: [PATCH] arm64, numa: Add cpu_to_node() implementation.

FromHanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Date2016-09-27 08:30 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH] arm64, numa: Add cpu_to_node() implementation.
Message-ID<slU3U-64K-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
On 09/20/2016 09:21 PM, Robert Richter wrote:
> On 20.09.16 19:32:34, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> On 09/20/2016 06:43 PM, Robert Richter wrote:
>
>>> Unfortunately either your nor my code does fix the BUG_ON() I see with
>>> the numa kernel:
>>>
>>>   kernel BUG at mm/page_alloc.c:1848!
>>>
>>> See below for the core dump. It looks like this happens due to moving
>>> a mem block where first and last page are mapped to different numa
>>> nodes, thus, triggering the BUG_ON().
>>
>> Didn't triggered it on our NUMA hardware, could you provide your
>> config then we can have a try?
>
> Config attached. Other configs with an initrd fail too.

hmm, we can't reproduce it on our hardware, do we need
to run some specific stress test on it?

Thanks
Hanjun

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1496453

FromRobert Richter <rric@kernel.org>
Date2016-10-06 11:20 +0200
Message-ID<spd0m-6Av-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1491702
On 27.09.16 14:26:08, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> On 09/20/2016 09:21 PM, Robert Richter wrote:
> >On 20.09.16 19:32:34, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> >>On 09/20/2016 06:43 PM, Robert Richter wrote:
> >
> >>>Unfortunately either your nor my code does fix the BUG_ON() I see with
> >>>the numa kernel:
> >>>
> >>>  kernel BUG at mm/page_alloc.c:1848!
> >>>
> >>>See below for the core dump. It looks like this happens due to moving
> >>>a mem block where first and last page are mapped to different numa
> >>>nodes, thus, triggering the BUG_ON().
> >>
> >>Didn't triggered it on our NUMA hardware, could you provide your
> >>config then we can have a try?
> >
> >Config attached. Other configs with an initrd fail too.
> 
> hmm, we can't reproduce it on our hardware, do we need
> to run some specific stress test on it?

No, it depends on the efi memory zones marked reserved. See my other
thread on this where I have attached mem ranges from the log. I have a
fix available already.

Thanks,

-Robert

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web