Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1496453

Re: [PATCH] arm64, numa: Add cpu_to_node() implementation.

From Robert Richter <rric@kernel.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH] arm64, numa: Add cpu_to_node() implementation.
Date 2016-10-06 11:20 +0200
Message-ID <spd0m-6Av-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <sjbNE-Bs-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <sjqMF-1Q1-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <sjrz3-2lw-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <sjthv-3tR-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <slU3U-64K-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 27.09.16 14:26:08, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> On 09/20/2016 09:21 PM, Robert Richter wrote:
> >On 20.09.16 19:32:34, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> >>On 09/20/2016 06:43 PM, Robert Richter wrote:
> >
> >>>Unfortunately either your nor my code does fix the BUG_ON() I see with
> >>>the numa kernel:
> >>>
> >>>  kernel BUG at mm/page_alloc.c:1848!
> >>>
> >>>See below for the core dump. It looks like this happens due to moving
> >>>a mem block where first and last page are mapped to different numa
> >>>nodes, thus, triggering the BUG_ON().
> >>
> >>Didn't triggered it on our NUMA hardware, could you provide your
> >>config then we can have a try?
> >
> >Config attached. Other configs with an initrd fail too.
> 
> hmm, we can't reproduce it on our hardware, do we need
> to run some specific stress test on it?

No, it depends on the efi memory zones marked reserved. See my other
thread on this where I have attached mem ranges from the log. I have a
fix available already.

Thanks,

-Robert

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH] arm64, numa: Add cpu_to_node() implementation. Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> - 2016-09-27 08:30 +0200
  Re: [PATCH] arm64, numa: Add cpu_to_node() implementation. Robert Richter <rric@kernel.org> - 2016-10-06 11:20 +0200

csiph-web