Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1494777 > unrolled thread

Re: virtio_blk: Clarification for communication difficulties?

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: virtio_blk: Clarification for communication difficulties? Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com> - 2016-10-03 11:30 +0200
    Re: virtio_blk: Clarification for communication difficulties? SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-10-03 14:10 +0200

#1494777 — Re: virtio_blk: Clarification for communication difficulties?

On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 10:09 AM, SF Markus Elfring
<elfring@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>> FWIW, he already gained a place on my ignore list for pestering me
>> offline about his patches and not stopping even when told to do so.
>
> How did I "pester" you "offline"?
>
>
>> So while I won't object if you choose to apply selected patches,
>
> Another bit of interesting information, isn't it?
>
>
>> I won't comment on any and won't take any (hey, I even won't see
>> them unless someone else replies...)
>
> I find this reaction strange. - I hope that our collaboration potential
> can be still constructive, can't it?

I can understand why others are fed up with this discussion.  Your
communication style is exhausting and you've pushed into the territory
where any benefits of taking the patches are not worth the time and
hassle of dealing with you.

I left Reviewed-bys on two patches.  Maybe they will get picked up.
But please think again about what Christian explained.  Reviewers and
maintainers spend time on your patches so make it worth their while.

Stefan

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1494851

>> I hope that our collaboration potential can be still constructive, can't it?
> 
> I can understand why others are fed up with this discussion.

Thanks for another feedback.


> Your communication style is exhausting

How did you get this impression?


> and you've pushed into the territory where any benefits of taking

Would you dare to acknowledge benefits from my update suggestions
for any other software components?


> the patches are not worth the time and hassle of dealing with you.

How are the chances that such a conclusion will change?


> I left Reviewed-bys on two patches.

Thanks for your constructive responses.


> Maybe they will get picked up.

I am also curious on how the software evolution will be continued.


> But please think again about what Christian explained.  Reviewers and
> maintainers spend time on your patches so make it worth their while.

I risk something just by proposing so many software updates for places
where change opportunities were found by special source code search patterns.

Regards,
Markus

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web