Re: virtio_blk: Clarification for communication difficulties?

From	SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: virtio_blk: Clarification for communication difficulties?
Date	2016-10-03 14:10 +0200
Message-ID	<soaee-4Im-33@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	(4 earlier) <sgZQB-4ZB-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <sh0D0-5xe-39@gated-at.bofh.it> <shdAe-6Rw-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <shemB-7pO-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <so7Jo-32K-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

>> I hope that our collaboration potential can be still constructive, can't it?
> 
> I can understand why others are fed up with this discussion.

Thanks for another feedback.


> Your communication style is exhausting

How did you get this impression?


> and you've pushed into the territory where any benefits of taking

Would you dare to acknowledge benefits from my update suggestions
for any other software components?


> the patches are not worth the time and hassle of dealing with you.

How are the chances that such a conclusion will change?


> I left Reviewed-bys on two patches.

Thanks for your constructive responses.


> Maybe they will get picked up.

I am also curious on how the software evolution will be continued.


> But please think again about what Christian explained.  Reviewers and
> maintainers spend time on your patches so make it worth their while.

I risk something just by proposing so many software updates for places
where change opportunities were found by special source code search patterns.

Regards,
Markus

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: virtio_blk: Clarification for communication difficulties? Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com> - 2016-10-03 11:30 +0200
  Re: virtio_blk: Clarification for communication difficulties? SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-10-03 14:10 +0200

csiph-web