Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1490816 > unrolled thread

[PATCH] ixgbe: mark symbols static where possible

Started byBaoyou Xie <baoyou.xie@linaro.org>
First post2016-09-25 08:10 +0200
Last post2016-09-26 00:30 +0200
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  [PATCH] ixgbe: mark symbols static where possible Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie@linaro.org> - 2016-09-25 08:10 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] ixgbe: mark symbols static where possible Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com> - 2016-09-26 00:30 +0200

#1490816 — [PATCH] ixgbe: mark symbols static where possible

FromBaoyou Xie <baoyou.xie@linaro.org>
Date2016-09-25 08:10 +0200
Subject[PATCH] ixgbe: mark symbols static where possible
Message-ID<slaNr-2Yy-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
We get 2 warnings when building kernel with W=1:
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_x550.c:2128:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'ixgbe_led_on_t_x550em' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_x550.c:2150:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'ixgbe_led_off_t_x550em' [-Wmissing-prototypes]

In fact, these two functions are only used in the file in which they are
declared and don't need a declaration, but can be made static.
so this patch marks these functions with 'static'.

Signed-off-by: Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_x550.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_x550.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_x550.c
index e092a89..dec8b11 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_x550.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_x550.c
@@ -2125,7 +2125,7 @@ static s32 ixgbe_reset_phy_t_X550em(struct ixgbe_hw *hw)
  *  @hw: pointer to hardware structure
  *  @led_idx: led number to turn on
  **/
-s32 ixgbe_led_on_t_x550em(struct ixgbe_hw *hw, u32 led_idx)
+static s32 ixgbe_led_on_t_x550em(struct ixgbe_hw *hw, u32 led_idx)
 {
 	u16 phy_data;
 
@@ -2147,7 +2147,7 @@ s32 ixgbe_led_on_t_x550em(struct ixgbe_hw *hw, u32 led_idx)
  *  @hw: pointer to hardware structure
  *  @led_idx: led number to turn off
  **/
-s32 ixgbe_led_off_t_x550em(struct ixgbe_hw *hw, u32 led_idx)
+static s32 ixgbe_led_off_t_x550em(struct ixgbe_hw *hw, u32 led_idx)
 {
 	u16 phy_data;
 
-- 
2.7.4

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1490989

FromJeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
Date2016-09-26 00:30 +0200
Message-ID<slq5Q-3YZ-39@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1490816

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Sun, 2016-09-25 at 14:03 +0800, Baoyou Xie wrote:
> We get 2 warnings when building kernel with W=1:
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_x550.c:2128:5: warning: no
> previous prototype for 'ixgbe_led_on_t_x550em' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_x550.c:2150:5: warning: no
> previous prototype for 'ixgbe_led_off_t_x550em' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> 
> In fact, these two functions are only used in the file in which they are
> declared and don't need a declaration, but can be made static.
> so this patch marks these functions with 'static'.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_x550.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)


This has been fixed and pushed upstream, why do you keep submitting this?

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web