Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1485786 > unrolled thread

[PATCH] dma-buf/sw_sync: mark sync_timeline_create() static

Started byBaoyou Xie <baoyou.xie@linaro.org>
First post2016-09-18 14:50 +0200
Last post2016-09-22 09:00 +0200
Articles 4 — 4 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  [PATCH] dma-buf/sw_sync: mark sync_timeline_create() static Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie@linaro.org> - 2016-09-18 14:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] dma-buf/sw_sync: mark sync_timeline_create() static Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@padovan.org> - 2016-09-20 13:20 +0200
      Re: [PATCH] dma-buf/sw_sync: mark sync_timeline_create() static Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org> - 2016-09-20 15:00 +0200
        Re: [PATCH] dma-buf/sw_sync: mark sync_timeline_create() static Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2016-09-22 09:00 +0200

#1485786 — [PATCH] dma-buf/sw_sync: mark sync_timeline_create() static

FromBaoyou Xie <baoyou.xie@linaro.org>
Date2016-09-18 14:50 +0200
Subject[PATCH] dma-buf/sw_sync: mark sync_timeline_create() static
Message-ID<siJHI-8bB-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
We get 1 warning when building kernel with W=1:
drivers/dma-buf/sw_sync.c:87:23: warning: no previous prototype for 'sync_timeline_create' [-Wmissing-prototypes]

In fact, this function is only used in the file in which it is
declared and don't need a declaration, but can be made static.
So this patch marks it 'static'.

Signed-off-by: Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/dma-buf/sw_sync.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/sw_sync.c b/drivers/dma-buf/sw_sync.c
index 62e8e6d..6f16c85 100644
--- a/drivers/dma-buf/sw_sync.c
+++ b/drivers/dma-buf/sw_sync.c
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ static inline struct sync_pt *fence_to_sync_pt(struct fence *fence)
  * Creates a new sync_timeline. Returns the sync_timeline object or NULL in
  * case of error.
  */
-struct sync_timeline *sync_timeline_create(const char *name)
+static struct sync_timeline *sync_timeline_create(const char *name)
 {
 	struct sync_timeline *obj;
 
-- 
2.7.4

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1487248

FromGustavo Padovan <gustavo@padovan.org>
Date2016-09-20 13:20 +0200
Message-ID<sjrfI-2eQ-23@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1485786
2016-09-18 Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie@linaro.org>:

> We get 1 warning when building kernel with W=1:
> drivers/dma-buf/sw_sync.c:87:23: warning: no previous prototype for 'sync_timeline_create' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> 
> In fact, this function is only used in the file in which it is
> declared and don't need a declaration, but can be made static.
> So this patch marks it 'static'.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/dma-buf/sw_sync.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Thanks for finding this.

Reviewed-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>

Gustavo

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1487307

FromSumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
Date2016-09-20 15:00 +0200
Message-ID<sjsOt-34H-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1487248
Hi Baoyou,

On 20 September 2016 at 16:43, Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@padovan.org> wrote:
> 2016-09-18 Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie@linaro.org>:
>
>> We get 1 warning when building kernel with W=1:
>> drivers/dma-buf/sw_sync.c:87:23: warning: no previous prototype for 'sync_timeline_create' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
>>
>> In fact, this function is only used in the file in which it is
>> declared and don't need a declaration, but can be made static.
>> So this patch marks it 'static'.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie@linaro.org>
>> ---
>>  drivers/dma-buf/sw_sync.c | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Thanks for finding this.

Thanks for the patch; this doesn't apply to mainline yet, since the
de-staging of sw_sync code is queued for 4.9 via Greg-KH's tree.
CC'ing him.

Greg, would it be possible to please take this via your tree?
>
> Reviewed-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
>
Acked-by: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>

> Gustavo
>

Best regards,
Sumi

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1488582

FromGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Date2016-09-22 09:00 +0200
Message-ID<sk69b-2XL-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1487307
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 06:23:33PM +0530, Sumit Semwal wrote:
> Hi Baoyou,
> 
> On 20 September 2016 at 16:43, Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@padovan.org> wrote:
> > 2016-09-18 Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie@linaro.org>:
> >
> >> We get 1 warning when building kernel with W=1:
> >> drivers/dma-buf/sw_sync.c:87:23: warning: no previous prototype for 'sync_timeline_create' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> >>
> >> In fact, this function is only used in the file in which it is
> >> declared and don't need a declaration, but can be made static.
> >> So this patch marks it 'static'.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie@linaro.org>
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/dma-buf/sw_sync.c | 2 +-
> >>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > Thanks for finding this.
> 
> Thanks for the patch; this doesn't apply to mainline yet, since the
> de-staging of sw_sync code is queued for 4.9 via Greg-KH's tree.
> CC'ing him.
> 
> Greg, would it be possible to please take this via your tree?

If someone resends it to me with the needed acks and reviewed-by, I
will.

thanks,

greg k-h

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web