Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1481110 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH v7 8/9] drm/mediatek: update DSI sub driver flow

Started byYT Shen <yt.shen@mediatek.com>
First post2016-09-12 12:20 +0200
Last post2016-09-13 12:00 +0200
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH v7 8/9] drm/mediatek: update DSI sub driver flow YT Shen <yt.shen@mediatek.com> - 2016-09-12 12:20 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v7 8/9] drm/mediatek: update DSI sub driver flow CK Hu <ck.hu@mediatek.com> - 2016-09-13 12:00 +0200

#1481110 — Re: [PATCH v7 8/9] drm/mediatek: update DSI sub driver flow

FromYT Shen <yt.shen@mediatek.com>
Date2016-09-12 12:20 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH v7 8/9] drm/mediatek: update DSI sub driver flow
Message-ID<sgwvg-1VB-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
Hi CK,

On Wed, 2016-09-07 at 12:58 +0800, CK Hu wrote:
> Hi, YT:
> 
> On Fri, 2016-09-02 at 19:24 +0800, YT Shen wrote:
> > This patch update enable/disable flow of DSI module and MIPI TX module
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: shaoming chen <shaoming.chen@mediatek.com>
> > Signed-off-by: YT Shen <yt.shen@mediatek.com>
> > ---
> 
> I think the description is too simple. Please briefly describe WHY of
> this patch. The original enable/disable flow is workable, so why do you
> need this patch? Without this patch, what problem would happen?
Got it, we will update more descriptions in the next version.
There is no transfer/interrupt function in the upstream DSI driver.
We also implement the following function [1][2] in this patch series.

Original flow works on there is a bridge chip: DSI -> bridge -> panel.
In this case: DSI -> panel, the DSI sub driver flow should be updated.
We need to initialize DSI first so that we can send commands to panel.

[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9310819/
drm/mediatek: add dsi interrupt control
[2] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9310823/
drm/mediatek: add dsi transfer function

> 
> Regards,
> CK
> 
> 

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1482326

FromCK Hu <ck.hu@mediatek.com>
Date2016-09-13 12:00 +0200
Message-ID<sgSFs-6J-39@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1481110
Hi, YT:

On Mon, 2016-09-12 at 18:15 +0800, YT Shen wrote:
> Hi CK,
> 
> On Wed, 2016-09-07 at 12:58 +0800, CK Hu wrote:
> > Hi, YT:
> > 
> > On Fri, 2016-09-02 at 19:24 +0800, YT Shen wrote:
> > > This patch update enable/disable flow of DSI module and MIPI TX module
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: shaoming chen <shaoming.chen@mediatek.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: YT Shen <yt.shen@mediatek.com>
> > > ---
> > 
> > I think the description is too simple. Please briefly describe WHY of
> > this patch. The original enable/disable flow is workable, so why do you
> > need this patch? Without this patch, what problem would happen?
> Got it, we will update more descriptions in the next version.
> There is no transfer/interrupt function in the upstream DSI driver.
> We also implement the following function [1][2] in this patch series.
> 
> Original flow works on there is a bridge chip: DSI -> bridge -> panel.
> In this case: DSI -> panel, the DSI sub driver flow should be updated.
> We need to initialize DSI first so that we can send commands to panel.
> 
> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9310819/
> drm/mediatek: add dsi interrupt control
> [2] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9310823/
> drm/mediatek: add dsi transfer function
> 

I suggest you to separate "DSI directly connect to panel" related
patches to another series because MT8173 could also apply it and it is
not essential for MT2701 if MT2701 use bridge IC for dsi.

Regards,
CK

> > 
> > Regards,
> > CK
> > 
> > 
> 
> 

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web