Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1474096 > unrolled thread

[PATCH v8 03/16] of/numa: add nid check for memory block

Started byZhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
First post2016-09-01 09:00 +0200
Last post2016-09-08 15:50 +0200
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  [PATCH v8 03/16] of/numa: add nid check for memory block Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> - 2016-09-01 09:00 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v8 03/16] of/numa: add nid check for memory block Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> - 2016-09-08 15:50 +0200

#1474096 — [PATCH v8 03/16] of/numa: add nid check for memory block

FromZhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
Date2016-09-01 09:00 +0200
Subject[PATCH v8 03/16] of/numa: add nid check for memory block
Message-ID<scu8F-5sK-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
If the numa-id which was configured in memory@ devicetree node is greater
than MAX_NUMNODES, we should report a warning. We have done this for cpus
and distance-map dt nodes, this patch help them to be consistent.

Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
---
 drivers/of/of_numa.c | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/of/of_numa.c b/drivers/of/of_numa.c
index 7b3fbdc..c1bd62c 100644
--- a/drivers/of/of_numa.c
+++ b/drivers/of/of_numa.c
@@ -75,6 +75,11 @@ static int __init of_numa_parse_memory_nodes(void)
 			 */
 			continue;

+		if (nid >= MAX_NUMNODES) {
+			pr_warn("NUMA: Node id %u exceeds maximum value\n", nid);
+			r = -EINVAL;
+		}
+
 		for (i = 0; !r && !of_address_to_resource(np, i, &rsrc); i++)
 			r = numa_add_memblk(nid, rsrc.start, rsrc.end + 1);

--
2.5.0

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1479237

FromRob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Date2016-09-08 15:50 +0200
Message-ID<sf7Sh-6qK-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1474096
On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 1:54 AM, Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> wrote:
> If the numa-id which was configured in memory@ devicetree node is greater
> than MAX_NUMNODES, we should report a warning. We have done this for cpus
> and distance-map dt nodes, this patch help them to be consistent.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
> ---
>  drivers/of/of_numa.c | 5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/of/of_numa.c b/drivers/of/of_numa.c
> index 7b3fbdc..c1bd62c 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/of_numa.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/of_numa.c
> @@ -75,6 +75,11 @@ static int __init of_numa_parse_memory_nodes(void)
>                          */
>                         continue;
>
> +               if (nid >= MAX_NUMNODES) {
> +                       pr_warn("NUMA: Node id %u exceeds maximum value\n", nid);

Really using pr_fmt should come first so you're not changing this
line. But not worth respinning for that:

Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>

Rob

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web