Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1474096 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-09-01 09:00 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-09-08 15:50 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
[PATCH v8 03/16] of/numa: add nid check for memory block Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> - 2016-09-01 09:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v8 03/16] of/numa: add nid check for memory block Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> - 2016-09-08 15:50 +0200
| From | Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-01 09:00 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH v8 03/16] of/numa: add nid check for memory block |
| Message-ID | <scu8F-5sK-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
If the numa-id which was configured in memory@ devicetree node is greater
than MAX_NUMNODES, we should report a warning. We have done this for cpus
and distance-map dt nodes, this patch help them to be consistent.
Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
---
drivers/of/of_numa.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/of/of_numa.c b/drivers/of/of_numa.c
index 7b3fbdc..c1bd62c 100644
--- a/drivers/of/of_numa.c
+++ b/drivers/of/of_numa.c
@@ -75,6 +75,11 @@ static int __init of_numa_parse_memory_nodes(void)
*/
continue;
+ if (nid >= MAX_NUMNODES) {
+ pr_warn("NUMA: Node id %u exceeds maximum value\n", nid);
+ r = -EINVAL;
+ }
+
for (i = 0; !r && !of_address_to_resource(np, i, &rsrc); i++)
r = numa_add_memblk(nid, rsrc.start, rsrc.end + 1);
--
2.5.0
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-08 15:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <sf7Sh-6qK-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1474096 |
On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 1:54 AM, Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> wrote:
> If the numa-id which was configured in memory@ devicetree node is greater
> than MAX_NUMNODES, we should report a warning. We have done this for cpus
> and distance-map dt nodes, this patch help them to be consistent.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
> ---
> drivers/of/of_numa.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/of/of_numa.c b/drivers/of/of_numa.c
> index 7b3fbdc..c1bd62c 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/of_numa.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/of_numa.c
> @@ -75,6 +75,11 @@ static int __init of_numa_parse_memory_nodes(void)
> */
> continue;
>
> + if (nid >= MAX_NUMNODES) {
> + pr_warn("NUMA: Node id %u exceeds maximum value\n", nid);
Really using pr_fmt should come first so you're not changing this
line. But not worth respinning for that:
Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Rob
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web