Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1478191 > unrolled thread

[PATCH] qed: add missing header dependencies

Started byBaoyou Xie <baoyou.xie@linaro.org>
First post2016-09-07 13:10 +0200
Last post2016-09-08 02:50 +0200
Articles 6 — 4 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  [PATCH] qed: add missing header dependencies Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie@linaro.org> - 2016-09-07 13:10 +0200
    RE: [PATCH] qed: add missing header dependencies Yuval Mintz <Yuval.Mintz@qlogic.com> - 2016-09-07 14:00 +0200
      Re: [PATCH] qed: add missing header dependencies Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-09-07 14:20 +0200
        RE: [PATCH] qed: add missing header dependencies Yuval Mintz <Yuval.Mintz@qlogic.com> - 2016-09-07 14:50 +0200
          Re: [PATCH] qed: add missing header dependencies Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-09-07 15:00 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] qed: add missing header dependencies David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> - 2016-09-08 02:50 +0200

#1478191 — [PATCH] qed: add missing header dependencies

FromBaoyou Xie <baoyou.xie@linaro.org>
Date2016-09-07 13:10 +0200
Subject[PATCH] qed: add missing header dependencies
Message-ID<seITU-7oj-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
We get 4 warnings when building kernel with W=1:
drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qed/qed_selftest.c:6:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'qed_selftest_memory' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qed/qed_selftest.c:19:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'qed_selftest_interrupt' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qed/qed_selftest.c:32:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'qed_selftest_register' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qed/qed_selftest.c:55:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'qed_selftest_clock' [-Wmissing-prototypes]

In fact, these functions are declared in qed_selftest.h, so this patch
add missing header dependencies.

Signed-off-by: Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qed/qed_selftest.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qed/qed_selftest.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qed/qed_selftest.c
index a342bfe..9b7678f 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qed/qed_selftest.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qed/qed_selftest.c
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
 #include "qed_dev_api.h"
 #include "qed_mcp.h"
 #include "qed_sp.h"
+#include "qed_selftest.h"
 
 int qed_selftest_memory(struct qed_dev *cdev)
 {
-- 
2.7.4

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1478238

FromYuval Mintz <Yuval.Mintz@qlogic.com>
Date2016-09-07 14:00 +0200
Message-ID<seJGh-7FE-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1478191
> We get 4 warnings when building kernel with W=1:
> drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qed/qed_selftest.c:6:5: warning: no previous
> prototype for 'qed_selftest_memory' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qed/qed_selftest.c:19:5: warning: no previous
> prototype for 'qed_selftest_interrupt' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qed/qed_selftest.c:32:5: warning: no previous
> prototype for 'qed_selftest_register' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qed/qed_selftest.c:55:5: warning: no previous
> prototype for 'qed_selftest_clock' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> 
> In fact, these functions are declared in qed_selftest.h, so this patch add missing
> header dependencies.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie@linaro.org>

While I obviously have no strong objection for including qed_selftest.h
from qed_selftest.c, I'm not sure I understand which C standard dictates
this requirement.
Why should a function definition [not call] be preceded by a prototype?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1478245

FromArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Date2016-09-07 14:20 +0200
Message-ID<seJZD-85G-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1478238
On Wednesday, September 7, 2016 11:37:07 AM CEST Yuval Mintz wrote:
> > We get 4 warnings when building kernel with W=1:
> > drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qed/qed_selftest.c:6:5: warning: no previous
> > prototype for 'qed_selftest_memory' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> > drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qed/qed_selftest.c:19:5: warning: no previous
> > prototype for 'qed_selftest_interrupt' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> > drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qed/qed_selftest.c:32:5: warning: no previous
> > prototype for 'qed_selftest_register' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> > drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qed/qed_selftest.c:55:5: warning: no previous
> > prototype for 'qed_selftest_clock' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> > 
> > In fact, these functions are declared in qed_selftest.h, so this patch add missing
> > header dependencies.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie@linaro.org>
> 
> While I obviously have no strong objection for including qed_selftest.h
> from qed_selftest.c, I'm not sure I understand which C standard dictates
> this requirement.
> Why should a function definition [not call] be preceded by a prototype?

This rule addresses two problems:

- some functions should be marked static as they are never used outside
  of the file that declares them. Marking them static give the compiler
  better opportunities for optimization and lets you see when a function
  becomes unused, and if there is no external declaration that is often
  an indication that there are no other users.

- When a function is defined in one file and used in another, you want
  both files to include the same header that has the declaration to
  ensure that the types are identical. There are cases where the
  prototype is changed after the fact in an incompatible way, causing
  silent data corruption on some configurations but maybe not on others.

	Arnd

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1478257

FromYuval Mintz <Yuval.Mintz@qlogic.com>
Date2016-09-07 14:50 +0200
Message-ID<seKsG-8fI-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1478245
> > While I obviously have no strong objection for including
> > qed_selftest.h from qed_selftest.c, I'm not sure I understand which C
> > standard dictates this requirement.
> > Why should a function definition [not call] be preceded by a prototype?
> 
> - When a function is defined in one file and used in another, you want
>   both files to include the same header that has the declaration to
>   ensure that the types are identical. There are cases where the
>   prototype is changed after the fact in an incompatible way, causing
>   silent data corruption on some configurations but maybe not on others.

O.k., motivation is clear.
But this really isn't enforced by the ansi-c standard, right?

Anyway, thanks.

Acked-by: Yuval Mintz <Yuval.Mintz@qlogic.com>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1478270

FromArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Date2016-09-07 15:00 +0200
Message-ID<seKCl-8iW-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1478257
On Wednesday, September 7, 2016 12:31:03 PM CEST Yuval Mintz wrote:
> > > While I obviously have no strong objection for including
> > > qed_selftest.h from qed_selftest.c, I'm not sure I understand which C
> > > standard dictates this requirement.
> > > Why should a function definition [not call] be preceded by a prototype?
> > 
> > - When a function is defined in one file and used in another, you want
> >   both files to include the same header that has the declaration to
> >   ensure that the types are identical. There are cases where the
> >   prototype is changed after the fact in an incompatible way, causing
> >   silent data corruption on some configurations but maybe not on others.
> 
> O.k., motivation is clear.
> But this really isn't enforced by the ansi-c standard, right?

No, ansi-c doesn't enforce this, and even the regular kernel build
flags don't enable the warning in question, we only get it when
either building with "make C=1" using sparse, or "make W=1" to
enable extra warnings from gcc.

The warning is however really useful, and I hope that we go through
all drivers in the kernel and eliminate these warnings in order
to turn them on by default for all drivers.

> Acked-by: Yuval Mintz <Yuval.Mintz@qlogic.com>

Thanks,

	Arnd

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1478704

FromDavid Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date2016-09-08 02:50 +0200
Message-ID<seVHs-7bz-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1478191
From: Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie@linaro.org>
Date: Wed,  7 Sep 2016 19:07:00 +0800

> We get 4 warnings when building kernel with W=1:
> drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qed/qed_selftest.c:6:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'qed_selftest_memory' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qed/qed_selftest.c:19:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'qed_selftest_interrupt' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qed/qed_selftest.c:32:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'qed_selftest_register' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qed/qed_selftest.c:55:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'qed_selftest_clock' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> 
> In fact, these functions are declared in qed_selftest.h, so this patch
> add missing header dependencies.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie@linaro.org>

Applied.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web