Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1471955 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Jia He <hejianet@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-08-29 18:10 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-08-30 10:20 +0200 |
| Articles | 3 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
[RFC PATCH 1/6] proc: Reduce cache miss in {snmp,netstat}_seq_show Jia He <hejianet@gmail.com> - 2016-08-29 18:10 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/6] proc: Reduce cache miss in {snmp,netstat}_seq_show Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> - 2016-08-29 18:50 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/6] proc: Reduce cache miss in {snmp,netstat}_seq_show hejianet <hejianet@gmail.com> - 2016-08-30 10:20 +0200
| From | Jia He <hejianet@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-29 18:10 +0200 |
| Subject | [RFC PATCH 1/6] proc: Reduce cache miss in {snmp,netstat}_seq_show |
| Message-ID | <sbxii-10O-33@gated-at.bofh.it> |
This patch exchanges the two loop for collecting the percpu statistics
data. This can aggregate the data by going through all the items of each
cpu sequentially. In snmp_seq_show, just use one buff copy to dislay the
Udp and UdpLite data because they are the same.
Signed-off-by: Jia He <hejianet@gmail.com>
---
net/ipv4/proc.c | 78 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/proc.c b/net/ipv4/proc.c
index 9f665b6..ed09566 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/proc.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/proc.c
@@ -380,11 +380,15 @@ static void icmp_put(struct seq_file *seq)
*/
static int snmp_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
{
- int i;
+ int i, c;
+ unsigned long buff[TCP_MIB_MAX];
+ u64 buff64[IPSTATS_MIB_MAX];
struct net *net = seq->private;
- seq_puts(seq, "Ip: Forwarding DefaultTTL");
+ memset(buff, 0, TCP_MIB_MAX * sizeof(unsigned long));
+ memset(buff64, 0, IPSTATS_MIB_MAX * sizeof(u64));
+ seq_puts(seq, "Ip: Forwarding DefaultTTL");
for (i = 0; snmp4_ipstats_list[i].name != NULL; i++)
seq_printf(seq, " %s", snmp4_ipstats_list[i].name);
@@ -393,11 +397,16 @@ static int snmp_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
net->ipv4.sysctl_ip_default_ttl);
BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(struct ipstats_mib, mibs) != 0);
+
+ for_each_possible_cpu(c) {
+ for (i = 0; snmp4_ipstats_list[i].name != NULL; i++)
+ buff64[i] += snmp_get_cpu_field64(
+ net->mib.ip_statistics,
+ c, snmp4_ipstats_list[i].entry,
+ offsetof(struct ipstats_mib, syncp));
+ }
for (i = 0; snmp4_ipstats_list[i].name != NULL; i++)
- seq_printf(seq, " %llu",
- snmp_fold_field64(net->mib.ip_statistics,
- snmp4_ipstats_list[i].entry,
- offsetof(struct ipstats_mib, syncp)));
+ seq_printf(seq, " %llu", buff64[i]);
icmp_put(seq); /* RFC 2011 compatibility */
icmpmsg_put(seq);
@@ -407,38 +416,41 @@ static int snmp_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
seq_printf(seq, " %s", snmp4_tcp_list[i].name);
seq_puts(seq, "\nTcp:");
+ for_each_possible_cpu(c) {
+ for (i = 0; snmp4_tcp_list[i].name != NULL; i++)
+ buff[i] += snmp_get_cpu_field(net->mib.tcp_statistics,
+ c, snmp4_tcp_list[i].entry);
+ }
+
for (i = 0; snmp4_tcp_list[i].name != NULL; i++) {
/* MaxConn field is signed, RFC 2012 */
if (snmp4_tcp_list[i].entry == TCP_MIB_MAXCONN)
- seq_printf(seq, " %ld",
- snmp_fold_field(net->mib.tcp_statistics,
- snmp4_tcp_list[i].entry));
+ seq_printf(seq, " %ld", buff[i]);
else
- seq_printf(seq, " %lu",
- snmp_fold_field(net->mib.tcp_statistics,
- snmp4_tcp_list[i].entry));
+ seq_printf(seq, " %lu", buff[i]);
}
+ memset(buff, 0, TCP_MIB_MAX * sizeof(unsigned long));
+
+ for_each_possible_cpu(c) {
+ for (i = 0; snmp4_udp_list[i].name != NULL; i++)
+ buff[i] += snmp_get_cpu_field(net->mib.udp_statistics,
+ c, snmp4_udp_list[i].entry);
+ }
seq_puts(seq, "\nUdp:");
for (i = 0; snmp4_udp_list[i].name != NULL; i++)
seq_printf(seq, " %s", snmp4_udp_list[i].name);
-
seq_puts(seq, "\nUdp:");
for (i = 0; snmp4_udp_list[i].name != NULL; i++)
- seq_printf(seq, " %lu",
- snmp_fold_field(net->mib.udp_statistics,
- snmp4_udp_list[i].entry));
+ seq_printf(seq, " %lu", buff[i]);
/* the UDP and UDP-Lite MIBs are the same */
seq_puts(seq, "\nUdpLite:");
for (i = 0; snmp4_udp_list[i].name != NULL; i++)
seq_printf(seq, " %s", snmp4_udp_list[i].name);
-
seq_puts(seq, "\nUdpLite:");
for (i = 0; snmp4_udp_list[i].name != NULL; i++)
- seq_printf(seq, " %lu",
- snmp_fold_field(net->mib.udplite_statistics,
- snmp4_udp_list[i].entry));
+ seq_printf(seq, " %lu", buff[i]);
seq_putc(seq, '\n');
return 0;
@@ -464,29 +476,39 @@ static const struct file_operations snmp_seq_fops = {
*/
static int netstat_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
{
- int i;
+ int i, c;
+ unsigned long buff[LINUX_MIB_MAX];
+ u64 buff64[IPSTATS_MIB_MAX];
struct net *net = seq->private;
+ memset(buff, 0, sizeof(unsigned long) * LINUX_MIB_MAX);
+ memset(buff64, 0, sizeof(u64) * IPSTATS_MIB_MAX);
+
seq_puts(seq, "TcpExt:");
for (i = 0; snmp4_net_list[i].name != NULL; i++)
seq_printf(seq, " %s", snmp4_net_list[i].name);
seq_puts(seq, "\nTcpExt:");
+ for_each_possible_cpu(c)
+ for (i = 0; snmp4_net_list[i].name != NULL; i++)
+ buff[i] += snmp_get_cpu_field(net->mib.net_statistics,
+ c, snmp4_net_list[i].entry);
for (i = 0; snmp4_net_list[i].name != NULL; i++)
- seq_printf(seq, " %lu",
- snmp_fold_field(net->mib.net_statistics,
- snmp4_net_list[i].entry));
+ seq_printf(seq, " %lu", buff[i]);
seq_puts(seq, "\nIpExt:");
for (i = 0; snmp4_ipextstats_list[i].name != NULL; i++)
seq_printf(seq, " %s", snmp4_ipextstats_list[i].name);
seq_puts(seq, "\nIpExt:");
+ for_each_possible_cpu(c)
+ for (i = 0; snmp4_ipextstats_list[i].name != NULL; i++)
+ buff64[i] += snmp_get_cpu_field64(
+ net->mib.ip_statistics,
+ c, snmp4_ipextstats_list[i].entry,
+ offsetof(struct ipstats_mib, syncp));
for (i = 0; snmp4_ipextstats_list[i].name != NULL; i++)
- seq_printf(seq, " %llu",
- snmp_fold_field64(net->mib.ip_statistics,
- snmp4_ipextstats_list[i].entry,
- offsetof(struct ipstats_mib, syncp)));
+ seq_printf(seq, " %llu", buff64[i]);
seq_putc(seq, '\n');
return 0;
--
1.8.3.1
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-29 18:50 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH 1/6] proc: Reduce cache miss in {snmp,netstat}_seq_show |
| Message-ID | <sbxUZ-1fP-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1471955 |
On Tue, 2016-08-30 at 00:03 +0800, Jia He wrote: > This patch exchanges the two loop for collecting the percpu statistics > data. This can aggregate the data by going through all the items of each > cpu sequentially. In snmp_seq_show, just use one buff copy to dislay the > Udp and UdpLite data because they are the same. This is obviously not true. On my laptop it seems it handled no UdpLite frames, but got plenty of Udp ones. $ grep Udp /proc/net/snmp Udp: InDatagrams NoPorts InErrors OutDatagrams RcvbufErrors SndbufErrors InCsumErrors Udp: 1555889 108318 0 3740780 0 0 0 UdpLite: InDatagrams NoPorts InErrors OutDatagrams RcvbufErrors SndbufErrors InCsumErrors UdpLite: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | hejianet <hejianet@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-30 10:20 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH 1/6] proc: Reduce cache miss in {snmp,netstat}_seq_show |
| Message-ID | <sbMqZ-2gM-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1471982 |
Hi Eric On 8/30/16 12:41 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote: > On Tue, 2016-08-30 at 00:03 +0800, Jia He wrote: >> This patch exchanges the two loop for collecting the percpu statistics >> data. This can aggregate the data by going through all the items of each >> cpu sequentially. In snmp_seq_show, just use one buff copy to dislay the >> Udp and UdpLite data because they are the same. > This is obviously not true. > > On my laptop it seems it handled no UdpLite frames, but got plenty of > Udp ones. > > $ grep Udp /proc/net/snmp > Udp: InDatagrams NoPorts InErrors OutDatagrams RcvbufErrors SndbufErrors InCsumErrors > Udp: 1555889 108318 0 3740780 0 0 0 > UdpLite: InDatagrams NoPorts InErrors OutDatagrams RcvbufErrors SndbufErrors InCsumErrors > UdpLite: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Thanks, you are right. I misunderstand the comments of source codes. Will resend it B.R. Jia > > > > . >
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web