Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1471276 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Arkadiusz Miskiewicz <a.miskiewicz@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-08-28 08:00 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-08-28 08:00 +0200 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: OOM detection regressions since 4.7 Arkadiusz Miskiewicz <a.miskiewicz@gmail.com> - 2016-08-28 08:00 +0200
| From | Arkadiusz Miskiewicz <a.miskiewicz@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-28 08:00 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: OOM detection regressions since 4.7 |
| Message-ID | <sb1iq-67J-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Thursday 25 of August 2016, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Tue 23-08-16 09:43:39, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Mon 22-08-16 15:05:17, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > On Mon, 22 Aug 2016 15:42:28 +0200 Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > Of course, if Linus/Andrew doesn't like to take those compaction > > > > improvements this late then I will ask to merge the partial revert to > > > > Linus tree as well and then there is not much to discuss. > > > > > > This sounds like the prudent option. Can we get 4.8 working > > > well-enough, backport that into 4.7.x and worry about the fancier stuff > > > for 4.9? > > > > OK, fair enough. > > > > I would really appreciate if the original reporters could retest with > > this patch on top of the current Linus tree. > > Any luck with the testing of this patch? Here my "rm -rf && cp -al" 10x in parallel test finished without OOM, so Tested-by: Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz <arekm@maven.pl> -- Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz, arekm / ( maven.pl | pld-linux.org )
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web