Re: OOM detection regressions since 4.7

From	Arkadiusz Miskiewicz <a.miskiewicz@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: OOM detection regressions since 4.7
Date	2016-08-28 08:00 +0200
Message-ID	<sb1iq-67J-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<s8TS1-4w9-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <s9fIS-1yv-61@gated-at.bofh.it> <s9XgS-6iK-35@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	Do not reply to gmail address. Write to arekm@maven.pl instead.

Show all headers | View raw

On Thursday 25 of August 2016, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 23-08-16 09:43:39, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Mon 22-08-16 15:05:17, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Mon, 22 Aug 2016 15:42:28 +0200 Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> 
wrote:
> > > > Of course, if Linus/Andrew doesn't like to take those compaction
> > > > improvements this late then I will ask to merge the partial revert to
> > > > Linus tree as well and then there is not much to discuss.
> > > 
> > > This sounds like the prudent option.  Can we get 4.8 working
> > > well-enough, backport that into 4.7.x and worry about the fancier stuff
> > > for 4.9?
> > 
> > OK, fair enough.
> > 
> > I would really appreciate if the original reporters could retest with
> > this patch on top of the current Linus tree.
> 
> Any luck with the testing of this patch?

Here my "rm -rf && cp -al" 10x in parallel test finished without OOM, so

Tested-by: Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz <arekm@maven.pl>

-- 
Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz, arekm / ( maven.pl | pld-linux.org )

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: OOM detection regressions since 4.7 Arkadiusz Miskiewicz <a.miskiewicz@gmail.com> - 2016-08-28 08:00 +0200

csiph-web