Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1470250 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-08-25 18:20 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-08-25 19:40 +0200 |
| Articles | 3 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH v2 6/8] i2c: mux: inform the i2c mux core about how it is used Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> - 2016-08-25 18:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 6/8] i2c: mux: inform the i2c mux core about how it is used Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> - 2016-08-25 18:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 6/8] i2c: mux: inform the i2c mux core about how it is used Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> - 2016-08-25 19:40 +0200
| From | Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-25 18:20 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 6/8] i2c: mux: inform the i2c mux core about how it is used |
| Message-ID | <sa5xM-3jP-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca9541.c b/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca9541.c > index 3cb8af635db5..f052c3067791 100644 > --- a/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca9541.c > +++ b/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca9541.c > @@ -349,7 +349,8 @@ static int pca9541_probe(struct i2c_client *client, > force = 0; > if (pdata) > force = pdata->modes[0].adap_id; > - muxc = i2c_mux_alloc(adap, &client->dev, 1, sizeof(*data), 0, > + muxc = i2c_mux_alloc(adap, &client->dev, 1, sizeof(*data), > + I2C_MUX_ARBITRATOR, Does it make sense to rename the file to i2c-arb-* somewhen then? Just asking, I'll apply the patch anyhow.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-25 18:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <sa5Hr-3mY-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1470250 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 06:22:37PM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote: > On 2016-08-25 18:19, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > >> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca9541.c b/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca9541.c > >> index 3cb8af635db5..f052c3067791 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca9541.c > >> +++ b/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca9541.c > >> @@ -349,7 +349,8 @@ static int pca9541_probe(struct i2c_client *client, > >> force = 0; > >> if (pdata) > >> force = pdata->modes[0].adap_id; > >> - muxc = i2c_mux_alloc(adap, &client->dev, 1, sizeof(*data), 0, > >> + muxc = i2c_mux_alloc(adap, &client->dev, 1, sizeof(*data), > >> + I2C_MUX_ARBITRATOR, > > > > Does it make sense to rename the file to i2c-arb-* somewhen then? Just > > asking, I'll apply the patch anyhow. > > There should be a clean branch with /only/ this series that both i2c and > iio can share, to prevent merge problems. I said I'd make such a branch > in the i2c-mux repo, but you are of course also welcome to provide that > branch if you prefer... No, this is fine. Send me a pull request and I'll merge.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-25 19:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <sa6Nb-41J-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1470257 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
> Right, I was waiting for some confirmation if v4.8-rc3 was a good base, > but I'm running out of patience... For me, it is perfect. > Anyway, I'll send the pull request no later that tomorrow morning (CEST). Thanks! > I assume I can add your ack? Rather this: Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web