Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1470250
| From | Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 6/8] i2c: mux: inform the i2c mux core about how it is used |
| Date | 2016-08-25 18:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <sa5xM-3jP-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <s6qAN-6iP-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <sa5xM-3jP-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca9541.c b/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca9541.c > index 3cb8af635db5..f052c3067791 100644 > --- a/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca9541.c > +++ b/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca9541.c > @@ -349,7 +349,8 @@ static int pca9541_probe(struct i2c_client *client, > force = 0; > if (pdata) > force = pdata->modes[0].adap_id; > - muxc = i2c_mux_alloc(adap, &client->dev, 1, sizeof(*data), 0, > + muxc = i2c_mux_alloc(adap, &client->dev, 1, sizeof(*data), > + I2C_MUX_ARBITRATOR, Does it make sense to rename the file to i2c-arb-* somewhen then? Just asking, I'll apply the patch anyhow.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH v2 6/8] i2c: mux: inform the i2c mux core about how it is used Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> - 2016-08-25 18:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 6/8] i2c: mux: inform the i2c mux core about how it is used Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> - 2016-08-25 18:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 6/8] i2c: mux: inform the i2c mux core about how it is used Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> - 2016-08-25 19:40 +0200
csiph-web