Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1555058 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-01-10 10:00 +0100 |
| Last post | 2017-01-10 10:00 +0100 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH v3 02/15] x86/entry: define _TIF_ALLWORK_MASK flags explicitly Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-01-10 10:00 +0100
| From | Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-01-10 10:00 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 02/15] x86/entry: define _TIF_ALLWORK_MASK flags explicitly |
| Message-ID | <sY0rE-7yf-21@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Thursday 08 December 2016 11:38 PM, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > The _TIF_ALLWORK_MASK macro automatically includes the least-significant > 16 bits of the thread_info flags, which is less than obvious and tends > to create confusion and surprises when reading or modifying the code. > > Define the flags explicitly. > > Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> For the version with swapped _TIF_SINGLESTEP and _TIF_NEED_RESCHED flags. Reviewed-by: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> -- cheers, Kamalesh.
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web