Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1555058 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH v3 02/15] x86/entry: define _TIF_ALLWORK_MASK flags explicitly

Started byKamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
First post2017-01-10 10:00 +0100
Last post2017-01-10 10:00 +0100
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH v3 02/15] x86/entry: define _TIF_ALLWORK_MASK flags  explicitly Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-01-10 10:00 +0100

#1555058 — Re: [PATCH v3 02/15] x86/entry: define _TIF_ALLWORK_MASK flags explicitly

FromKamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date2017-01-10 10:00 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 02/15] x86/entry: define _TIF_ALLWORK_MASK flags explicitly
Message-ID<sY0rE-7yf-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
On Thursday 08 December 2016 11:38 PM, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> The _TIF_ALLWORK_MASK macro automatically includes the least-significant
> 16 bits of the thread_info flags, which is less than obvious and tends
> to create confusion and surprises when reading or modifying the code.
>
> Define the flags explicitly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>

For the version with swapped _TIF_SINGLESTEP and _TIF_NEED_RESCHED
flags.

Reviewed-by: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

-- 
cheers,
Kamalesh.

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web