Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1554480 > unrolled thread

[PATCH v2 1/6] mmc: sunxi: Always set signal delay to 0 for A64

Started byMaxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
First post2017-01-09 17:50 +0100
Last post2017-01-11 22:20 +0100
Articles 3 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  [PATCH v2 1/6] mmc: sunxi: Always set signal delay to 0 for A64 Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> - 2017-01-09 17:50 +0100
    Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] mmc: sunxi: Always set signal delay to 0 for A64 André Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> - 2017-01-10 01:40 +0100
      Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] mmc: sunxi: Always set signal delay to 0 for A64 Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> - 2017-01-11 22:20 +0100

#1554480 — [PATCH v2 1/6] mmc: sunxi: Always set signal delay to 0 for A64

FromMaxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Date2017-01-09 17:50 +0100
Subject[PATCH v2 1/6] mmc: sunxi: Always set signal delay to 0 for A64
Message-ID<sXLiW-6zl-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
Experience have shown that the using the  autocalibration could severely
degrade the performances of the MMC bus.

Allwinner is using in its BSP a delay set to 0 for all the modes but HS400.
Remove the calibration code for now, and add comments to document our
findings.

Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
---
 drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c | 50 ++++++++++++-------------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c
index b1d1303389a7..ea9552a0d820 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c
@@ -683,41 +683,19 @@ static int sunxi_mmc_oclk_onoff(struct sunxi_mmc_host *host, u32 oclk_en)
 
 static int sunxi_mmc_calibrate(struct sunxi_mmc_host *host, int reg_off)
 {
-	u32 reg = readl(host->reg_base + reg_off);
-	u32 delay;
-	unsigned long timeout;
-
 	if (!host->cfg->can_calibrate)
 		return 0;
 
-	reg &= ~(SDXC_CAL_DL_MASK << SDXC_CAL_DL_SW_SHIFT);
-	reg &= ~SDXC_CAL_DL_SW_EN;
-
-	writel(reg | SDXC_CAL_START, host->reg_base + reg_off);
-
-	dev_dbg(mmc_dev(host->mmc), "calibration started\n");
-
-	timeout = jiffies + HZ * SDXC_CAL_TIMEOUT;
-
-	while (!((reg = readl(host->reg_base + reg_off)) & SDXC_CAL_DONE)) {
-		if (time_before(jiffies, timeout))
-			cpu_relax();
-		else {
-			reg &= ~SDXC_CAL_START;
-			writel(reg, host->reg_base + reg_off);
-
-			return -ETIMEDOUT;
-		}
-	}
-
-	delay = (reg >> SDXC_CAL_DL_SHIFT) & SDXC_CAL_DL_MASK;
-
-	reg &= ~SDXC_CAL_START;
-	reg |= (delay << SDXC_CAL_DL_SW_SHIFT) | SDXC_CAL_DL_SW_EN;
-
-	writel(reg, host->reg_base + reg_off);
-
-	dev_dbg(mmc_dev(host->mmc), "calibration ended, reg is 0x%x\n", reg);
+	/*
+	 * FIXME:
+	 * This is not clear how the calibration is supposed to work
+	 * yet. The best rate have been obtained by simply setting the
+	 * delay to 0, as Allwinner does in its BSP.
+	 *
+	 * The only mode that doesn't have such a delay is HS400, that
+	 * is in itself a TODO.
+	 */
+	writel(SDXC_CAL_DL_SW_EN, host->reg_base + reg_off);
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -806,7 +784,13 @@ static int sunxi_mmc_clk_set_rate(struct sunxi_mmc_host *host,
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
-	/* TODO: enable calibrate on sdc2 SDXC_REG_DS_DL_REG of A64 */
+	/*
+	 * FIXME:
+	 *
+	 * In HS400 we'll also need to calibrate the data strobe
+	 * signal. This should only happen on the MMC2 controller (at
+	 * least on the A64 and older SoCs).
+	 */
 
 	return sunxi_mmc_oclk_onoff(host, 1);
 }
-- 
git-series 0.8.11

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1554827

FromAndré Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Date2017-01-10 01:40 +0100
Message-ID<sXSDL-2Bu-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1554480
On 09/01/17 16:46, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Experience have shown that the using the  autocalibration could severely
> degrade the performances of the MMC bus.
> 
> Allwinner is using in its BSP a delay set to 0 for all the modes but HS400.
> Remove the calibration code for now, and add comments to document our
> findings.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
> ---
>  drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c | 50 ++++++++++++-------------------------
>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c
> index b1d1303389a7..ea9552a0d820 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c
> @@ -683,41 +683,19 @@ static int sunxi_mmc_oclk_onoff(struct sunxi_mmc_host *host, u32 oclk_en)
>  
>  static int sunxi_mmc_calibrate(struct sunxi_mmc_host *host, int reg_off)
>  {
> -	u32 reg = readl(host->reg_base + reg_off);
> -	u32 delay;
> -	unsigned long timeout;
> -
>  	if (!host->cfg->can_calibrate)
>  		return 0;
>  
> -	reg &= ~(SDXC_CAL_DL_MASK << SDXC_CAL_DL_SW_SHIFT);
> -	reg &= ~SDXC_CAL_DL_SW_EN;
> -
> -	writel(reg | SDXC_CAL_START, host->reg_base + reg_off);
> -
> -	dev_dbg(mmc_dev(host->mmc), "calibration started\n");
> -
> -	timeout = jiffies + HZ * SDXC_CAL_TIMEOUT;
> -
> -	while (!((reg = readl(host->reg_base + reg_off)) & SDXC_CAL_DONE)) {
> -		if (time_before(jiffies, timeout))
> -			cpu_relax();
> -		else {
> -			reg &= ~SDXC_CAL_START;
> -			writel(reg, host->reg_base + reg_off);
> -
> -			return -ETIMEDOUT;
> -		}
> -	}
> -
> -	delay = (reg >> SDXC_CAL_DL_SHIFT) & SDXC_CAL_DL_MASK;
> -
> -	reg &= ~SDXC_CAL_START;
> -	reg |= (delay << SDXC_CAL_DL_SW_SHIFT) | SDXC_CAL_DL_SW_EN;
> -
> -	writel(reg, host->reg_base + reg_off);
> -
> -	dev_dbg(mmc_dev(host->mmc), "calibration ended, reg is 0x%x\n", reg);
> +	/*
> +	 * FIXME:
> +	 * This is not clear how the calibration is supposed to work
> +	 * yet. The best rate have been obtained by simply setting the
> +	 * delay to 0, as Allwinner does in its BSP.
> +	 *
> +	 * The only mode that doesn't have such a delay is HS400, that
> +	 * is in itself a TODO.
> +	 */
> +	writel(SDXC_CAL_DL_SW_EN, host->reg_base + reg_off);
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -806,7 +784,13 @@ static int sunxi_mmc_clk_set_rate(struct sunxi_mmc_host *host,
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
>  
> -	/* TODO: enable calibrate on sdc2 SDXC_REG_DS_DL_REG of A64 */
> +	/*
> +	 * FIXME:
> +	 *
> +	 * In HS400 we'll also need to calibrate the data strobe
> +	 * signal. This should only happen on the MMC2 controller (at
> +	 * least on the A64 and older SoCs).

Which older SoCs have this calibration register and a DS signal?
Is that supposed to mean "other" SoCs?

Other than that:

Reviewed-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>

Cheers,
Andre.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1556938

FromMaxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Date2017-01-11 22:20 +0100
Message-ID<sYytj-3x3-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1554827

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 12:30:41AM +0000, André Przywara wrote:
> On 09/01/17 16:46, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > Experience have shown that the using the  autocalibration could severely
> > degrade the performances of the MMC bus.
> > 
> > Allwinner is using in its BSP a delay set to 0 for all the modes but HS400.
> > Remove the calibration code for now, and add comments to document our
> > findings.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c | 50 ++++++++++++-------------------------
> >  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c
> > index b1d1303389a7..ea9552a0d820 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c
> > @@ -683,41 +683,19 @@ static int sunxi_mmc_oclk_onoff(struct sunxi_mmc_host *host, u32 oclk_en)
> >  
> >  static int sunxi_mmc_calibrate(struct sunxi_mmc_host *host, int reg_off)
> >  {
> > -	u32 reg = readl(host->reg_base + reg_off);
> > -	u32 delay;
> > -	unsigned long timeout;
> > -
> >  	if (!host->cfg->can_calibrate)
> >  		return 0;
> >  
> > -	reg &= ~(SDXC_CAL_DL_MASK << SDXC_CAL_DL_SW_SHIFT);
> > -	reg &= ~SDXC_CAL_DL_SW_EN;
> > -
> > -	writel(reg | SDXC_CAL_START, host->reg_base + reg_off);
> > -
> > -	dev_dbg(mmc_dev(host->mmc), "calibration started\n");
> > -
> > -	timeout = jiffies + HZ * SDXC_CAL_TIMEOUT;
> > -
> > -	while (!((reg = readl(host->reg_base + reg_off)) & SDXC_CAL_DONE)) {
> > -		if (time_before(jiffies, timeout))
> > -			cpu_relax();
> > -		else {
> > -			reg &= ~SDXC_CAL_START;
> > -			writel(reg, host->reg_base + reg_off);
> > -
> > -			return -ETIMEDOUT;
> > -		}
> > -	}
> > -
> > -	delay = (reg >> SDXC_CAL_DL_SHIFT) & SDXC_CAL_DL_MASK;
> > -
> > -	reg &= ~SDXC_CAL_START;
> > -	reg |= (delay << SDXC_CAL_DL_SW_SHIFT) | SDXC_CAL_DL_SW_EN;
> > -
> > -	writel(reg, host->reg_base + reg_off);
> > -
> > -	dev_dbg(mmc_dev(host->mmc), "calibration ended, reg is 0x%x\n", reg);
> > +	/*
> > +	 * FIXME:
> > +	 * This is not clear how the calibration is supposed to work
> > +	 * yet. The best rate have been obtained by simply setting the
> > +	 * delay to 0, as Allwinner does in its BSP.
> > +	 *
> > +	 * The only mode that doesn't have such a delay is HS400, that
> > +	 * is in itself a TODO.
> > +	 */
> > +	writel(SDXC_CAL_DL_SW_EN, host->reg_base + reg_off);
> >  
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> > @@ -806,7 +784,13 @@ static int sunxi_mmc_clk_set_rate(struct sunxi_mmc_host *host,
> >  	if (ret)
> >  		return ret;
> >  
> > -	/* TODO: enable calibrate on sdc2 SDXC_REG_DS_DL_REG of A64 */
> > +	/*
> > +	 * FIXME:
> > +	 *
> > +	 * In HS400 we'll also need to calibrate the data strobe
> > +	 * signal. This should only happen on the MMC2 controller (at
> > +	 * least on the A64 and older SoCs).
> 
> Which older SoCs have this calibration register and a DS signal?
> Is that supposed to mean "other" SoCs?

That was supposed to mean that newer (than A64) SoCs might have that
calibration on other controllers than MMC2. But you're right that it
actually applies only to A64 anyway, I'll remove the and older part.

> Other than that:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>

Thanks!
Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web