Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1553532 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH 1/5] ARM: dts: qcom: apq8064: Add missing scm clock

Started byJohn Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
First post2017-01-07 02:20 +0100
Last post2017-01-07 08:40 +0100
Articles 3 — 3 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH 1/5] ARM: dts: qcom: apq8064: Add missing scm clock John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> - 2017-01-07 02:20 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 1/5] ARM: dts: qcom: apq8064: Add missing scm clock Andy Gross <andy.gross@linaro.org> - 2017-01-07 04:10 +0100
      Re: [PATCH 1/5] ARM: dts: qcom: apq8064: Add missing scm clock Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org> - 2017-01-07 08:40 +0100

#1553532 — Re: [PATCH 1/5] ARM: dts: qcom: apq8064: Add missing scm clock

FromJohn Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Date2017-01-07 02:20 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/5] ARM: dts: qcom: apq8064: Add missing scm clock
Message-ID<sWNPP-1Ls-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 3:49 AM, Bjorn Andersson
<bjorn.andersson@linaro.org> wrote:
> As per the device tree binding the apq8064 scm node requires the core
> clock to be specified, so add this.
>
> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064.dtsi | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064.dtsi
> index 268bd470c865..78bf155a52f3 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064.dtsi
> @@ -303,6 +303,9 @@
>         firmware {
>                 scm {
>                         compatible = "qcom,scm-apq8064";
> +
> +                       clocks = <&gcc CE3_CORE_CLK>;
> +                       clock-names = "core";


Tested-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>

I know Bjorn has a new version of this patch that uses the
RPM_DAYTONA_FABRIC_CLK value, but that one results in problems with
usb gadget functionality on my Nexus7.  This one seems to work ok
though.

thanks
-john

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1553568

FromAndy Gross <andy.gross@linaro.org>
Date2017-01-07 04:10 +0100
Message-ID<sWPyh-2WW-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1553532
On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 05:10:44PM -0800, John Stultz wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 3:49 AM, Bjorn Andersson
> <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org> wrote:
> > As per the device tree binding the apq8064 scm node requires the core
> > clock to be specified, so add this.
> >
> > Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064.dtsi | 3 +++
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064.dtsi
> > index 268bd470c865..78bf155a52f3 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064.dtsi
> > @@ -303,6 +303,9 @@
> >         firmware {
> >                 scm {
> >                         compatible = "qcom,scm-apq8064";
> > +
> > +                       clocks = <&gcc CE3_CORE_CLK>;
> > +                       clock-names = "core";
> 
> 
> Tested-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
> 
> I know Bjorn has a new version of this patch that uses the
> RPM_DAYTONA_FABRIC_CLK value, but that one results in problems with
> usb gadget functionality on my Nexus7.  This one seems to work ok
> though.

Odd.  Is the usb gadget using the daytona but not getting a reference?  I wonder
if this is related to not having the bus driver running the bus clk enablement
and frequencies.


Andy

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1553604

FromBjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Date2017-01-07 08:40 +0100
Message-ID<sWTLz-5DF-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1553568
On Fri 06 Jan 19:01 PST 2017, Andy Gross wrote:

> On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 05:10:44PM -0800, John Stultz wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 3:49 AM, Bjorn Andersson
> > <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org> wrote:
> > > As per the device tree binding the apq8064 scm node requires the core
> > > clock to be specified, so add this.
> > >
> > > Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
> > > ---
> > >  arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064.dtsi | 3 +++
> > >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064.dtsi
> > > index 268bd470c865..78bf155a52f3 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064.dtsi
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064.dtsi
> > > @@ -303,6 +303,9 @@
> > >         firmware {
> > >                 scm {
> > >                         compatible = "qcom,scm-apq8064";
> > > +
> > > +                       clocks = <&gcc CE3_CORE_CLK>;
> > > +                       clock-names = "core";
> > 
> > 
> > Tested-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
> > 
> > I know Bjorn has a new version of this patch that uses the
> > RPM_DAYTONA_FABRIC_CLK value, but that one results in problems with
> > usb gadget functionality on my Nexus7.  This one seems to work ok
> > though.
> 
> Odd.  Is the usb gadget using the daytona but not getting a reference?  I wonder
> if this is related to not having the bus driver running the bus clk enablement
> and frequencies.
> 

The fact that we now reference the Daytona clock means that we're also
telling the RPM to disable it, so that might very well be the case.

Unfortunately I can't find any block diagram for 8064 to show what hangs
off the Daytona, so I'm not sure in what way USB should reference it.

Regards,
Bjorn

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web