Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1544402 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-12-19 10:50 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-12-20 18:20 +0100 |
| Articles | 2 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
[PATCH 6/6] KVM: lapic: do not scan IRR when delivering an interrupt Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> - 2016-12-19 10:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 6/6] KVM: lapic: do not scan IRR when delivering an interrupt Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> - 2016-12-20 18:20 +0100
| From | Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-19 10:50 +0100 |
| Subject | [PATCH 6/6] KVM: lapic: do not scan IRR when delivering an interrupt |
| Message-ID | <sQ2JY-60r-25@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On interrupt delivery the PPR can only grow, so it is impossible
that interrupt delivery results in KVM_REQ_EVENT. Make this
clear by using __apic_update_ppr, and by not using apic_*_isr
for Hyper-V auto-EOI interrupts.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c | 13 +++++--------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
index dc4ea8bdea9c..4dc02482faf7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
@@ -2110,6 +2110,7 @@ int kvm_get_apic_interrupt(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
int vector = kvm_apic_has_interrupt(vcpu);
struct kvm_lapic *apic = vcpu->arch.apic;
+ u32 ppr;
if (vector == -1)
return -1;
@@ -2121,15 +2122,11 @@ int kvm_get_apic_interrupt(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
* because the process would deliver it through the IDT.
*/
- apic_set_isr(vector, apic);
- apic_update_ppr(apic);
- apic_clear_irr(vector, apic);
-
- if (test_bit(vector, vcpu_to_synic(vcpu)->auto_eoi_bitmap)) {
- apic_clear_isr(vector, apic);
- apic_update_ppr(apic);
- }
+ if (!test_bit(vector, vcpu_to_synic(vcpu)->auto_eoi_bitmap))
+ apic_set_isr(vector, apic);
+ apic_clear_irr(vector, apic);
+ __apic_update_ppr(apic, &ppr);
return vector;
}
--
1.8.3.1
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-20 18:20 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 6/6] KVM: lapic: do not scan IRR when delivering an interrupt |
| Message-ID | <sQwf0-8sT-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1544402 |
On 19/12/2016 10:47, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > + if (!test_bit(vector, vcpu_to_synic(vcpu)->auto_eoi_bitmap)) > + apic_set_isr(vector, apic); > > + apic_clear_irr(vector, apic); > + __apic_update_ppr(apic, &ppr); Hmm, EOI does apic_update_ppr, so for auto-EOI interrupts I think it's safer to do apic_update_ppr instead. You could have to interrupts injected at the same time, and the lower-priority interrupt would be lost if the higher-priority interrupt does automatic EOI. Paolo
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web