Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1542877 > unrolled thread

[patch 3/3] x86/process: Optimize TIF_NOTSC switch

Started byThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
First post2016-12-15 17:50 +0100
Last post2016-12-16 19:40 +0100
Articles 4 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  [patch 3/3] x86/process: Optimize TIF_NOTSC switch Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2016-12-15 17:50 +0100
    Re: [patch 3/3] x86/process: Optimize TIF_NOTSC switch Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2016-12-15 18:40 +0100
      Re: [patch 3/3] x86/process: Optimize TIF_NOTSC switch Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2016-12-16 10:00 +0100
        Re: [patch 3/3] x86/process: Optimize TIF_NOTSC switch Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2016-12-16 19:40 +0100

#1542877 — [patch 3/3] x86/process: Optimize TIF_NOTSC switch

FromThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Date2016-12-15 17:50 +0100
Subject[patch 3/3] x86/process: Optimize TIF_NOTSC switch
Message-ID<sOHoe-87a-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
Provide and use a toggle helper instead of doing it with a branch.

x86_64:
3662       8505      16   12183    2f97 Before
3646	   8505	     16	  12167	   2f87	After 

i386:
5906	   9388	   1804	  17098	   42ca	Before
5834	   9324	   1740	  16898	   4202	After

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h |   10 ++++++++++
 arch/x86/kernel/process.c       |   22 ++++------------------
 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h
@@ -110,6 +110,16 @@ static inline void cr4_clear_bits(unsign
 	}
 }
 
+static inline void cr4_toggle_bits(unsigned long mask)
+{
+	unsigned long cr4;
+
+	cr4 = this_cpu_read(cpu_tlbstate.cr4);
+	cr4 ^= mask;
+	this_cpu_write(cpu_tlbstate.cr4, cr4);
+	__write_cr4(cr4);
+}
+
 /* Read the CR4 shadow. */
 static inline unsigned long cr4_read_shadow(void)
 {
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
@@ -116,11 +116,6 @@ void flush_thread(void)
 	fpu__clear(&tsk->thread.fpu);
 }
 
-static void hard_disable_TSC(void)
-{
-	cr4_set_bits(X86_CR4_TSD);
-}
-
 void disable_TSC(void)
 {
 	preempt_disable();
@@ -129,15 +124,10 @@ void disable_TSC(void)
 		 * Must flip the CPU state synchronously with
 		 * TIF_NOTSC in the current running context.
 		 */
-		hard_disable_TSC();
+		cr4_set_bits(X86_CR4_TSD);
 	preempt_enable();
 }
 
-static void hard_enable_TSC(void)
-{
-	cr4_clear_bits(X86_CR4_TSD);
-}
-
 static void enable_TSC(void)
 {
 	preempt_disable();
@@ -146,7 +136,7 @@ static void enable_TSC(void)
 		 * Must flip the CPU state synchronously with
 		 * TIF_NOTSC in the current running context.
 		 */
-		hard_enable_TSC();
+		cr4_clear_bits(X86_CR4_TSD);
 	preempt_enable();
 }
 
@@ -212,12 +202,8 @@ void __switch_to_xtra(struct task_struct
 	if ((tifp ^ tifn) & _TIF_BLOCKSTEP)
 		toggle_debugctlmsr(DEBUGCTLMSR_BTF);
 
-	if ((tifp ^ tifn) & _TIF_NOTSC) {
-		if (tifn & _TIF_NOTSC)
-			hard_disable_TSC();
-		else
-			hard_enable_TSC();
-	}
+	if ((tifp ^ tifn) & _TIF_NOTSC)
+		cr4_toggle_bits(X86_CR4_TSD);
 }
 
 /*

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1542940

FromAndy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Date2016-12-15 18:40 +0100
Message-ID<sOIaC-cX-45@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1542877
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 8:44 AM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
> Provide and use a toggle helper instead of doing it with a branch.
>
> x86_64:
> 3662       8505      16   12183    2f97 Before
> 3646       8505      16   12167    2f87 After
>
> i386:
> 5906       9388    1804   17098    42ca Before
> 5834       9324    1740   16898    4202 After
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h |   10 ++++++++++
>  arch/x86/kernel/process.c       |   22 ++++------------------
>  2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h
> @@ -110,6 +110,16 @@ static inline void cr4_clear_bits(unsign
>         }
>  }
>
> +static inline void cr4_toggle_bits(unsigned long mask)
> +{
> +       unsigned long cr4;
> +
> +       cr4 = this_cpu_read(cpu_tlbstate.cr4);
> +       cr4 ^= mask;
> +       this_cpu_write(cpu_tlbstate.cr4, cr4);
> +       __write_cr4(cr4);
> +}

This scares me for the same reason as BTF, although this should at
least be less fragile.  But how about:

static inline void cr4_set_bit_to(unsigned long mask, bool set)
{
  ...
  cr4 &= ~mask;
  cr4 ^= (set << ilog2(mask));
  ...
}

This should generate code that's nearly as good.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1543259

FromThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Date2016-12-16 10:00 +0100
Message-ID<sOWwV-19z-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1542940
On Thu, 15 Dec 2016, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 8:44 AM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
> > +static inline void cr4_toggle_bits(unsigned long mask)
> > +{
> > +       unsigned long cr4;
> > +
> > +       cr4 = this_cpu_read(cpu_tlbstate.cr4);
> > +       cr4 ^= mask;
> > +       this_cpu_write(cpu_tlbstate.cr4, cr4);
> > +       __write_cr4(cr4);
> > +}
> 
> This scares me for the same reason as BTF, although this should at
> least be less fragile.  But how about:

If that is fragile then all cr4 manipulation code is fragile because it
relies on cpu_tlbstate.cr4. The TIF flag and that per cpu thing are kept in
sync.

Thanks,

	tglx

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1543671

FromAndy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Date2016-12-16 19:40 +0100
Message-ID<sP5Ae-7fU-31@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1543259
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 12:50 AM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Dec 2016, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 8:44 AM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
>> > +static inline void cr4_toggle_bits(unsigned long mask)
>> > +{
>> > +       unsigned long cr4;
>> > +
>> > +       cr4 = this_cpu_read(cpu_tlbstate.cr4);
>> > +       cr4 ^= mask;
>> > +       this_cpu_write(cpu_tlbstate.cr4, cr4);
>> > +       __write_cr4(cr4);
>> > +}
>>
>> This scares me for the same reason as BTF, although this should at
>> least be less fragile.  But how about:
>
> If that is fragile then all cr4 manipulation code is fragile because it
> relies on cpu_tlbstate.cr4. The TIF flag and that per cpu thing are kept in
> sync.

True.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web