Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1542477 > unrolled thread

[PATCH] kref: prefer atomic_inc_not_zero to atomic_add_unless

Started by"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
First post2016-12-15 06:00 +0100
Last post2016-12-15 10:00 +0100
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  [PATCH] kref: prefer atomic_inc_not_zero to atomic_add_unless "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com> - 2016-12-15 06:00 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] kref: prefer atomic_inc_not_zero to atomic_add_unless Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> - 2016-12-15 10:00 +0100

#1542477 — [PATCH] kref: prefer atomic_inc_not_zero to atomic_add_unless

From"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Date2016-12-15 06:00 +0100
Subject[PATCH] kref: prefer atomic_inc_not_zero to atomic_add_unless
Message-ID<sOwj7-1j4-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
On most platforms, there exists this ifdef:

 #define atomic_inc_not_zero(v) atomic_add_unless((v), 1, 0)

This makes this patch functionally useless. However, on PPC, there is
actually an explicit definition of atomic_inc_not_zero with its own
assembly that is slightly more optimized than atomic_add_unless. So,
this patch changes kref to use atomic_inc_not_zero instead, for PPC and
any future platforms that might provide an explicit implementation.

This also puts this usage of kref more in line with a verbatim reading
of the examples in Paul McKenney's paper [1] in the section titled "2.4
Atomic Counting With Check and Release Memory Barrier", which uses
atomic_inc_not_zero.

[1] http://open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2007/n2167.pdf

Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>
---
This was reviewed favorably 14 months ago but never picked up.
I'm resubmitting it now in hopes that you can finally queue it
up for 4.10.

 include/linux/kref.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/kref.h b/include/linux/kref.h
index e15828fd71f1..62f0a84ae94e 100644
--- a/include/linux/kref.h
+++ b/include/linux/kref.h
@@ -133,6 +133,6 @@ static inline int kref_put_mutex(struct kref *kref,
  */
 static inline int __must_check kref_get_unless_zero(struct kref *kref)
 {
-	return atomic_add_unless(&kref->refcount, 1, 0);
+	return atomic_inc_not_zero(&kref->refcount);
 }
 #endif /* _KREF_H_ */
-- 
2.11.0

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1542564

FromChristoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Date2016-12-15 10:00 +0100
Message-ID<sOA3n-3DP-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1542477
It's also way easier to read using atomic_inc_not_zero..

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

Not sure you're sending this to the right maintainers, though.  You
probably want to include Greg.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web