Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1538802 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.vnet.ibm.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-12-08 19:50 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-12-09 15:10 +0100 |
| Articles | 3 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] perf: add PERF_RECORD_NAMESPACES to include namespaces related info Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-12-08 19:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] perf: add PERF_RECORD_NAMESPACES to include namespaces related info Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-12-09 11:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] perf: add PERF_RECORD_NAMESPACES to include namespaces related info Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-12-09 15:10 +0100
| From | Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.vnet.ibm.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-08 19:50 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] perf: add PERF_RECORD_NAMESPACES to include namespaces related info |
| Message-ID | <sMbVv-188-23@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Hi Peter,
Sorry for taking so long to respond...
On Thursday 24 November 2016 08:40 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 08:14:29PM +0530, Hari Bathini wrote:
>> @@ -862,6 +875,19 @@ enum perf_event_type {
>> */
>> PERF_RECORD_SWITCH_CPU_WIDE = 15,
>>
>> + /*
>> + * struct {
>> + * struct perf_event_header header;
>> + *
>> + * u32 pid, tid;
>> + * u64 time;
> pid,tid and time are already present in sample_id. Many of the 'legacy'
> record have redundant information since we added sample_id, but most of
> the new ones haven't and rely on sample_all being set.
I tried using pid/tid from sample data, but realized that pid/tid in
event_id
could be different from the one in sample data, at least for fork/namespaces
events, since __perf_event_header__init_id( ) that updates the sample data
is getting the pid/tid of current task.
I am not sure if it is advisable to change __perf_event_header__init_id(
) for this..?
Thanks
Hari
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.vnet.ibm.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-09 11:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sMqrw-21a-29@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1538802 |
On Friday 09 December 2016 12:10 AM, Hari Bathini wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
>
> Sorry for taking so long to respond...
>
>
> On Thursday 24 November 2016 08:40 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 08:14:29PM +0530, Hari Bathini wrote:
>>> @@ -862,6 +875,19 @@ enum perf_event_type {
>>> */
>>> PERF_RECORD_SWITCH_CPU_WIDE = 15,
>>> + /*
>>> + * struct {
>>> + * struct perf_event_header header;
>>> + *
>>> + * u32 pid, tid;
>>> + * u64 time;
>> pid,tid and time are already present in sample_id. Many of the 'legacy'
>> record have redundant information since we added sample_id, but most of
>> the new ones haven't and rely on sample_all being set.
>
> I tried using pid/tid from sample data, but realized that pid/tid in
> event_id
> could be different from the one in sample data, at least for
> fork/namespaces
> events, since __perf_event_header__init_id( ) that updates the sample
> data
> is getting the pid/tid of current task.
>
> I am not sure if it is advisable to change
> __perf_event_header__init_id( ) for this..?
>
Hi Peter,
Adding task parameter to __perf_event_header__init_id( ) and doing
something like..
perf_event_pid(event, task ? task : current)
perf_event_tid(event, task ? task : current)
Also, for synthesized events, sample_id is not updated currently.
Working on it as that
is needed if we want to relay on pid, tid values from sample_id. Let me
know, if this is
what you had in mind or something else altogether..
Thanks
Hari
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-09 15:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sMu26-4gD-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1538802 |
On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 12:10:20AM +0530, Hari Bathini wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
>
> Sorry for taking so long to respond...
>
>
> On Thursday 24 November 2016 08:40 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 08:14:29PM +0530, Hari Bathini wrote:
> >>@@ -862,6 +875,19 @@ enum perf_event_type {
> >> */
> >> PERF_RECORD_SWITCH_CPU_WIDE = 15,
> >>+ /*
> >>+ * struct {
> >>+ * struct perf_event_header header;
> >>+ *
> >>+ * u32 pid, tid;
> >>+ * u64 time;
> >pid,tid and time are already present in sample_id. Many of the 'legacy'
> >record have redundant information since we added sample_id, but most of
> >the new ones haven't and rely on sample_all being set.
>
> I tried using pid/tid from sample data, but realized that pid/tid in
> event_id
> could be different from the one in sample data, at least for fork/namespaces
> events, since __perf_event_header__init_id( ) that updates the sample data
> is getting the pid/tid of current task.
Ah indeed. Yes please disregard my comment then.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web