Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1535773 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Gonglei (Arei)" <arei.gonglei@huawei.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-12-05 04:20 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-12-08 03:20 +0100 |
| Articles | 3 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
RE: [PATCH v5 1/1] crypto: add virtio-crypto driver "Gonglei (Arei)" <arei.gonglei@huawei.com> - 2016-12-05 04:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH v5 1/1] crypto: add virtio-crypto driver Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> - 2016-12-07 21:40 +0100
RE: [PATCH v5 1/1] crypto: add virtio-crypto driver "Gonglei (Arei)" <arei.gonglei@huawei.com> - 2016-12-08 03:20 +0100
| From | "Gonglei (Arei)" <arei.gonglei@huawei.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-05 04:20 +0100 |
| Subject | RE: [PATCH v5 1/1] crypto: add virtio-crypto driver |
| Message-ID | <sKRYS-7qO-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
I don't think the root cause of those warnings are introduced by virtio-crypto driver. What's your opinion? Sam and David? Thanks, -Gonglei > -----Original Message----- > From: kbuild test robot [mailto:lkp@intel.com] > Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2016 10:40 AM > Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/1] crypto: add virtio-crypto driver > > Hi Gonglei, > > [auto build test ERROR on cryptodev/master] > [also build test ERROR on v4.9-rc7 next-20161202] > [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help > improve the system] > > url: > https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Gonglei/crypto-add-virtio-crypto-dri > ver/20161202-190424 > base: > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/herbert/cryptodev-2.6.git > master > config: sparc64-allyesconfig (attached as .config) > compiler: sparc64-linux-gnu-gcc (Debian 6.1.1-9) 6.1.1 20160705 > reproduce: > wget > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git/plain/sbin/make.cr > oss -O ~/bin/make.cross > chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross > # save the attached .config to linux build tree > make.cross ARCH=sparc64 > > All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): > > In file included from arch/sparc/include/asm/topology.h:4:0, > from include/linux/topology.h:35, > from include/linux/gfp.h:8, > from include/linux/kmod.h:22, > from include/linux/module.h:13, > from drivers/crypto/virtio/virtio_crypto_mgr.c:21: > drivers/crypto/virtio/virtio_crypto_common.h: In function > 'virtio_crypto_get_current_node': > >> arch/sparc/include/asm/topology_64.h:44:44: error: implicit declaration of > function 'cpu_data' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > #define topology_physical_package_id(cpu) (cpu_data(cpu).proc_id) > ^ > drivers/crypto/virtio/virtio_crypto_common.h:116:9: note: in expansion of > macro 'topology_physical_package_id' > return topology_physical_package_id(smp_processor_id()); > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > >> arch/sparc/include/asm/topology_64.h:44:57: error: request for member > 'proc_id' in something not a structure or union > #define topology_physical_package_id(cpu) (cpu_data(cpu).proc_id) > ^ > drivers/crypto/virtio/virtio_crypto_common.h:116:9: note: in expansion of > macro 'topology_physical_package_id' > return topology_physical_package_id(smp_processor_id()); > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > cc1: some warnings being treated as errors > > vim +/cpu_data +44 arch/sparc/include/asm/topology_64.h > > f5e706ad include/asm-sparc/topology_64.h Sam Ravnborg > 2008-07-17 28 > 9d079337 arch/sparc/include/asm/topology_64.h David Miller > 2009-01-11 29 #define cpumask_of_pcibus(bus) \ > 9d079337 arch/sparc/include/asm/topology_64.h David Miller > 2009-01-11 30 (pcibus_to_node(bus) == -1 ? \ > e9b37512 arch/sparc/include/asm/topology_64.h Rusty Russell > 2009-03-16 31 cpu_all_mask : \ > 9d079337 arch/sparc/include/asm/topology_64.h David Miller > 2009-01-11 32 cpumask_of_node(pcibus_to_node(bus))) > f5e706ad include/asm-sparc/topology_64.h Sam Ravnborg > 2008-07-17 33 > 52708d69 arch/sparc/include/asm/topology_64.h Nitin Gupta > 2015-11-02 34 int __node_distance(int, int); > 52708d69 arch/sparc/include/asm/topology_64.h Nitin Gupta > 2015-11-02 35 #define node_distance(a, b) __node_distance(a, b) > 52708d69 arch/sparc/include/asm/topology_64.h Nitin Gupta > 2015-11-02 36 > f5e706ad include/asm-sparc/topology_64.h Sam Ravnborg > 2008-07-17 37 #else /* CONFIG_NUMA */ > f5e706ad include/asm-sparc/topology_64.h Sam Ravnborg > 2008-07-17 38 > f5e706ad include/asm-sparc/topology_64.h Sam Ravnborg > 2008-07-17 39 #include <asm-generic/topology.h> > f5e706ad include/asm-sparc/topology_64.h Sam Ravnborg > 2008-07-17 40 > f5e706ad include/asm-sparc/topology_64.h Sam Ravnborg > 2008-07-17 41 #endif /* !(CONFIG_NUMA) */ > f5e706ad include/asm-sparc/topology_64.h Sam Ravnborg > 2008-07-17 42 > f5e706ad include/asm-sparc/topology_64.h Sam Ravnborg > 2008-07-17 43 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP > f5e706ad include/asm-sparc/topology_64.h Sam Ravnborg > 2008-07-17 @44 #define topology_physical_package_id(cpu) > (cpu_data(cpu).proc_id) > f5e706ad include/asm-sparc/topology_64.h Sam Ravnborg > 2008-07-17 45 #define topology_core_id(cpu) > (cpu_data(cpu).core_id) > acc455cf arch/sparc/include/asm/topology_64.h chris hyser > 2015-04-22 46 #define topology_core_cpumask(cpu) > (&cpu_core_sib_map[cpu]) > 06931e62 arch/sparc/include/asm/topology_64.h Bartosz Golaszewski > 2015-05-26 47 #define topology_sibling_cpumask(cpu) > (&per_cpu(cpu_sibling_map, cpu)) > f5e706ad include/asm-sparc/topology_64.h Sam Ravnborg > 2008-07-17 48 #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */ > f5e706ad include/asm-sparc/topology_64.h Sam Ravnborg > 2008-07-17 49 > 3905c54f arch/sparc/include/asm/topology_64.h Stephen Rothwell > 2011-04-12 50 extern cpumask_t cpu_core_map[NR_CPUS]; > acc455cf arch/sparc/include/asm/topology_64.h chris hyser > 2015-04-22 51 extern cpumask_t cpu_core_sib_map[NR_CPUS]; > 3905c54f arch/sparc/include/asm/topology_64.h Stephen Rothwell > 2011-04-12 52 static inline const struct cpumask *cpu_coregroup_mask(int > cpu) > > :::::: The code at line 44 was first introduced by commit > :::::: f5e706ad886b6a5eb59637830110b09ccebf01c5 sparc: join the remaining > header files > > :::::: TO: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> > :::::: CC: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> > > --- > 0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology > Center > https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel > Corporation
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-07 21:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sLRap-4Se-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1535773 |
On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 03:12:52AM +0000, Gonglei (Arei) wrote: > I don't think the root cause of those warnings are introduced by virtio-crypto driver. > > What's your opinion? Sam and David? Root cause here is that arch/sparc/include/asm/topology_64.h references cpu_data without including arch/sparc/include/asm/cpudata.h I think other architectures pull in the dependency from either smp.h or they have it topology.h. The easy fix would be to include cpudata.h in arch/sparc/include/asm/topology_64.h. And that should also be a correct fix. Could you include this in your patch-set and build test it? Sam
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Gonglei (Arei)" <arei.gonglei@huawei.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-08 03:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sLWtr-8ph-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1538061 |
Hi Sam, > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/1] crypto: add virtio-crypto driver > > On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 03:12:52AM +0000, Gonglei (Arei) wrote: > > I don't think the root cause of those warnings are introduced by virtio-crypto > driver. > > > > What's your opinion? Sam and David? > > Root cause here is that arch/sparc/include/asm/topology_64.h > references cpu_data without including arch/sparc/include/asm/cpudata.h > > I think other architectures pull in the dependency from > either smp.h or they have it topology.h. > > The easy fix would be to include cpudata.h in > arch/sparc/include/asm/topology_64.h. > And that should also be a correct fix. > > Could you include this in your patch-set and build test it? > Sure, I can add this one at the head of my patch set, but because I haven't sparc environment, so it depends on the kbuild test robot to test. Thanks, -Gonglei
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web