Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1533969 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH v3 11/14] ACPI: irq: introduce interrupt producer

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: [PATCH v3 11/14] ACPI: irq: introduce interrupt producer Aleksey Makarov <amakarov.linux@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 12:20 +0100
    Re: [PATCH v3 11/14] ACPI: irq: introduce interrupt producer Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> - 2016-12-02 11:10 +0100

#1533969 — Re: [PATCH v3 11/14] ACPI: irq: introduce interrupt producer

Hi Hanjun,

On 10/25/2016 09:09 PM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> From: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
>
> In ACPI 6.1 spec, section 19.6.62, Interrupt Resource Descriptor Macro,

[ ... ]

> ---
>  drivers/acpi/gsi.c      | 10 ++++--
>  drivers/acpi/resource.c | 85 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>  include/acpi/acpi_bus.h |  1 +
>  3 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/gsi.c b/drivers/acpi/gsi.c
> index ee9e0f2..29ee547 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/gsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/gsi.c
> @@ -55,13 +55,19 @@ int acpi_register_gsi(struct device *dev, u32 gsi, int trigger,
>  		      int polarity)
>  {
>  	struct irq_fwspec fwspec;
> +	struct acpi_device *adev = dev ? to_acpi_device(dev) : NULL;

Why are you sure dev is always an acpi device?
Look for example at drivers/acpi/pci_irq.c:377 where this function
is called for a PCI device

>
> -	if (WARN_ON(!acpi_gsi_domain_id)) {
> +	if (adev && &adev->fwnode && adev->interrupt_producer)

&adev->fwnode is always true

> +		/* devices in DSDT connecting to spefic interrupt producer */
> +		fwspec.fwnode = adev->interrupt_producer;
> +	else if (acpi_gsi_domain_id)
> +		/* devices connecting to gicd in default */
> +		fwspec.fwnode = acpi_gsi_domain_id;
> +	else {
>  		pr_warn("GSI: No registered irqchip, giving up\n");
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}

[ ... ]

All the best
Aleksey Makarov

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1534782

Hi Aleksey,

On 2016/12/1 19:12, Aleksey Makarov wrote:
>
> Hi Hanjun,
>
> On 10/25/2016 09:09 PM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> From: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
>>
>> In ACPI 6.1 spec, section 19.6.62, Interrupt Resource Descriptor Macro,
>
> [ ... ]
>
>> ---
>>  drivers/acpi/gsi.c      | 10 ++++--
>>  drivers/acpi/resource.c | 85
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>>  include/acpi/acpi_bus.h |  1 +
>>  3 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/gsi.c b/drivers/acpi/gsi.c
>> index ee9e0f2..29ee547 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/gsi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/gsi.c
>> @@ -55,13 +55,19 @@ int acpi_register_gsi(struct device *dev, u32 gsi,
>> int trigger,
>>                int polarity)
>>  {
>>      struct irq_fwspec fwspec;
>> +    struct acpi_device *adev = dev ? to_acpi_device(dev) : NULL;
>
> Why are you sure dev is always an acpi device?
> Look for example at drivers/acpi/pci_irq.c:377 where this function
> is called for a PCI device

Good catch, but I will drop this patch and use Agustin's one [1].

[1]: https://mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg1283116.html

Thanks
Hanjun

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web