Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1531987 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH] mtd: Allocate bdi objects dynamically

Started bySandeep Jain <Sandeep_Jain@mentor.com>
First post2016-11-29 09:20 +0100
Last post2016-12-01 19:20 +0100
Articles 4 — 3 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH] mtd: Allocate bdi objects dynamically Sandeep Jain <Sandeep_Jain@mentor.com> - 2016-11-29 09:20 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] mtd: Allocate bdi objects dynamically Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 17:00 +0100
      Re: [PATCH] mtd: Allocate bdi objects dynamically Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 19:20 +0100
      Re: [PATCH] mtd: Allocate bdi objects dynamically Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 19:20 +0100

#1531987 — Re: [PATCH] mtd: Allocate bdi objects dynamically

FromSandeep Jain <Sandeep_Jain@mentor.com>
Date2016-11-29 09:20 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH] mtd: Allocate bdi objects dynamically
Message-ID<sILNU-5On-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Dear Maintainers,
   This patch is already reviewed twice with no issues.
Requesting your attention for patch merge.

Thanks & Regards,
Sandeep Jain

On Sat, Nov 05, 2016 at 08:22:31AM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 11/03/2016 12:34 PM, Sandeep Jain wrote:
> > Dear Maintainers,
> >   This patch is reviewed by Richard.
> > Requesting for Maintainer's attention for patch merge.
> > 
> > Thanks & Regards,
> > Sandeep Jain
> > 
> > On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 04:41:47PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> >> On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 4:01 PM, Sandeep Jain <Sandeep_Jain@mentor.com> wrote:
> >>> From: Steve Longerbeam <steve_longerbeam@mentor.com>
> >>>
> >>> The MTD backing dev info objects mtd_bdi was statically allocated.
> >>> So when MTD is built as a loadable module, this object fall in the
> >>> vmalloc address space.
> >>>
> >>> The problem with that, is that the BDI APIs use wake_up_bit(), which calls
> >>> virt_to_page() to retrieve the memory zone of the page containing the
> >>> wait_queue to wake up, and virt_to_page() is not valid for vmalloc or
> >>> highmem addresses.
> >>>
> >>> Fix this by allocating the BDI objects dynamically with kmalloc. The
> >>> objects now fall in the logical address space so that BDI APIs will
> >>> work in all cases (mtd builtin or module).
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Steve Longerbeam <steve_longerbeam@mentor.com>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Jim Baxter <jim_baxter@mentor.com>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Sandeep Jain <Sandeep_Jain@mentor.com>
> >>
> >> Reviewed-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
> 
> I don't see any obvious problem either:
> Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>
> 
> -- 
> Best regards,
> Marek Vasut

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1534229

FromMarek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>
Date2016-12-01 17:00 +0100
Message-ID<sJBWa-5Xk-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1531987
On 11/29/2016 09:12 AM, Sandeep Jain wrote:
> Dear Maintainers,
>    This patch is already reviewed twice with no issues.
> Requesting your attention for patch merge.
> 
> Thanks & Regards,
> Sandeep Jain
> 
> On Sat, Nov 05, 2016 at 08:22:31AM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 11/03/2016 12:34 PM, Sandeep Jain wrote:
>>> Dear Maintainers,
>>>   This patch is reviewed by Richard.
>>> Requesting for Maintainer's attention for patch merge.
>>>
>>> Thanks & Regards,
>>> Sandeep Jain
>>>
>>> On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 04:41:47PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 4:01 PM, Sandeep Jain <Sandeep_Jain@mentor.com> wrote:
>>>>> From: Steve Longerbeam <steve_longerbeam@mentor.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> The MTD backing dev info objects mtd_bdi was statically allocated.
>>>>> So when MTD is built as a loadable module, this object fall in the
>>>>> vmalloc address space.
>>>>>
>>>>> The problem with that, is that the BDI APIs use wake_up_bit(), which calls
>>>>> virt_to_page() to retrieve the memory zone of the page containing the
>>>>> wait_queue to wake up, and virt_to_page() is not valid for vmalloc or
>>>>> highmem addresses.
>>>>>
>>>>> Fix this by allocating the BDI objects dynamically with kmalloc. The
>>>>> objects now fall in the logical address space so that BDI APIs will
>>>>> work in all cases (mtd builtin or module).
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Steve Longerbeam <steve_longerbeam@mentor.com>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Jim Baxter <jim_baxter@mentor.com>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Sandeep Jain <Sandeep_Jain@mentor.com>
>>>>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
>>
>> I don't see any obvious problem either:
>> Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>

Bump?

-- 
Best regards,
Marek Vasut

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1534368

FromMarek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>
Date2016-12-01 19:20 +0100
Message-ID<sJE7D-85V-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1534229
On 12/01/2016 07:14 PM, Brian Norris wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 04:39:23PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 11/29/2016 09:12 AM, Sandeep Jain wrote:
>>> On Sat, Nov 05, 2016 at 08:22:31AM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>>> On 11/03/2016 12:34 PM, Sandeep Jain wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 04:41:47PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 4:01 PM, Sandeep Jain <Sandeep_Jain@mentor.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> From: Steve Longerbeam <steve_longerbeam@mentor.com>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The MTD backing dev info objects mtd_bdi was statically allocated.
>>>>>>> So when MTD is built as a loadable module, this object fall in the
>>>>>>> vmalloc address space.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The problem with that, is that the BDI APIs use wake_up_bit(), which calls
>>>>>>> virt_to_page() to retrieve the memory zone of the page containing the
>>>>>>> wait_queue to wake up, and virt_to_page() is not valid for vmalloc or
>>>>>>> highmem addresses.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Fix this by allocating the BDI objects dynamically with kmalloc. The
>>>>>>> objects now fall in the logical address space so that BDI APIs will
>>>>>>> work in all cases (mtd builtin or module).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Steve Longerbeam <steve_longerbeam@mentor.com>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Jim Baxter <jim_baxter@mentor.com>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Sandeep Jain <Sandeep_Jain@mentor.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Reviewed-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
>>>>
>>>> I don't see any obvious problem either:
>>>> Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>
>>
>> Bump?
> 
> Applied to l2-mtd.git.
> 
Thanks !

-- 
Best regards,
Marek Vasut

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1534369

FromBrian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
Date2016-12-01 19:20 +0100
Message-ID<sJE7D-85V-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1534229
On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 04:39:23PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 11/29/2016 09:12 AM, Sandeep Jain wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 05, 2016 at 08:22:31AM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >> On 11/03/2016 12:34 PM, Sandeep Jain wrote:
> >>> On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 04:41:47PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> >>>> On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 4:01 PM, Sandeep Jain <Sandeep_Jain@mentor.com> wrote:
> >>>>> From: Steve Longerbeam <steve_longerbeam@mentor.com>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The MTD backing dev info objects mtd_bdi was statically allocated.
> >>>>> So when MTD is built as a loadable module, this object fall in the
> >>>>> vmalloc address space.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The problem with that, is that the BDI APIs use wake_up_bit(), which calls
> >>>>> virt_to_page() to retrieve the memory zone of the page containing the
> >>>>> wait_queue to wake up, and virt_to_page() is not valid for vmalloc or
> >>>>> highmem addresses.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Fix this by allocating the BDI objects dynamically with kmalloc. The
> >>>>> objects now fall in the logical address space so that BDI APIs will
> >>>>> work in all cases (mtd builtin or module).
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Steve Longerbeam <steve_longerbeam@mentor.com>
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Jim Baxter <jim_baxter@mentor.com>
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Sandeep Jain <Sandeep_Jain@mentor.com>
> >>>>
> >>>> Reviewed-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
> >>
> >> I don't see any obvious problem either:
> >> Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>
> 
> Bump?

Applied to l2-mtd.git.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web