Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1530534 > unrolled thread
| Started by | David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-11-25 22:20 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-11-25 22:30 +0100 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH] cxgb4: fix memory leak on txq_info David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> - 2016-11-25 22:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH] cxgb4: fix memory leak on txq_info Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> - 2016-11-25 22:30 +0100
| From | David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-25 22:20 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] cxgb4: fix memory leak on txq_info |
| Message-ID | <sHw4y-5Op-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
From: Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com> Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2016 11:02:44 +0000 > From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> > > Currently if txq_info->uldtxq cannot be allocated then > txq_info->txq is being kfree'd (which is redundant because it > is NULL) instead of txq_info. Fix this by instead kfree'ing > txq_info. > > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> Applied, but Colin you _really_ need to start properly marking your networking patch submissions by indicating in the subject which tree your change is for. In this case I figured out it was net-next, but you must say this explicitly in the Subject line via "Subject: [PATCH net-next] ..." Thanks.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-25 22:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sHwee-5RF-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1530534 |
On 25/11/16 21:10, David Miller wrote: > From: Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com> > Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2016 11:02:44 +0000 > >> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> >> >> Currently if txq_info->uldtxq cannot be allocated then >> txq_info->txq is being kfree'd (which is redundant because it >> is NULL) instead of txq_info. Fix this by instead kfree'ing >> txq_info. >> >> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> > > Applied, but Colin you _really_ need to start properly marking your > networking patch submissions by indicating in the subject which > tree your change is for. In this case I figured out it was > net-next, but you must say this explicitly in the Subject line > via "Subject: [PATCH net-next] ..." > > Thanks. > Understood, will do next time, apologies for that. Colin
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web