Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1525278 > unrolled thread

[PATCH 0/2] ACPI / processor / cpufreq: Function return value cleanups

Started by"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
First post2016-11-18 14:00 +0100
Last post2016-11-21 04:40 +0100
Articles 4 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  [PATCH 0/2] ACPI / processor / cpufreq: Function return value cleanups "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-11-18 14:00 +0100
    [PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: Make cpufreq_update_policy() void "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-11-18 14:00 +0100
    [PATCH 1/2] ACPI / processor: Make acpi_processor_ppc_has_changed() void "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-11-18 14:00 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 0/2] ACPI / processor / cpufreq: Function return value  cleanups Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2016-11-21 04:40 +0100

#1525278 — [PATCH 0/2] ACPI / processor / cpufreq: Function return value cleanups

From"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Date2016-11-18 14:00 +0100
Subject[PATCH 0/2] ACPI / processor / cpufreq: Function return value cleanups
Message-ID<sEQVQ-7dC-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Hi,

Two cleanups related to unused function return values, [1/2] in processor_perflib.c
and [2/2] in cpufreq.c.

Thanks,
Rafael

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1525282 — [PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: Make cpufreq_update_policy() void

From"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Date2016-11-18 14:00 +0100
Subject[PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: Make cpufreq_update_policy() void
Message-ID<sEQVQ-7dC-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1525278
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

The return value of cpufreq_update_policy() is never used, so make
it void.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---

On top of https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9436381/

---
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c |   21 +++++++--------------
 include/linux/cpufreq.h   |    2 +-
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -2257,21 +2257,18 @@ static int cpufreq_set_policy(struct cpu
  *	Useful for policy notifiers which have different necessities
  *	at different times.
  */
-int cpufreq_update_policy(unsigned int cpu)
+void cpufreq_update_policy(unsigned int cpu)
 {
 	struct cpufreq_policy *policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
 	struct cpufreq_policy new_policy;
-	int ret;
 
 	if (!policy)
-		return -ENODEV;
+		return;
 
 	down_write(&policy->rwsem);
 
-	if (policy_is_inactive(policy)) {
-		ret = -ENODEV;
+	if (policy_is_inactive(policy))
 		goto unlock;
-	}
 
 	pr_debug("updating policy for CPU %u\n", cpu);
 	memcpy(&new_policy, policy, sizeof(*policy));
@@ -2283,24 +2280,20 @@ int cpufreq_update_policy(unsigned int c
 	 * -> ask driver for current freq and notify governors about a change
 	 */
 	if (cpufreq_driver->get && !cpufreq_driver->setpolicy) {
-		if (cpufreq_suspended) {
-			ret = -EAGAIN;
+		if (cpufreq_suspended)
 			goto unlock;
-		}
+
 		new_policy.cur = cpufreq_update_current_freq(policy);
-		if (WARN_ON(!new_policy.cur)) {
-			ret = -EIO;
+		if (WARN_ON(!new_policy.cur))
 			goto unlock;
-		}
 	}
 
-	ret = cpufreq_set_policy(policy, &new_policy);
+	cpufreq_set_policy(policy, &new_policy);
 
 unlock:
 	up_write(&policy->rwsem);
 
 	cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
-	return ret;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpufreq_update_policy);
 
Index: linux-pm/include/linux/cpufreq.h
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/include/linux/cpufreq.h
+++ linux-pm/include/linux/cpufreq.h
@@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ void disable_cpufreq(void);
 
 u64 get_cpu_idle_time(unsigned int cpu, u64 *wall, int io_busy);
 int cpufreq_get_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int cpu);
-int cpufreq_update_policy(unsigned int cpu);
+void cpufreq_update_policy(unsigned int cpu);
 bool have_governor_per_policy(void);
 struct kobject *get_governor_parent_kobj(struct cpufreq_policy *policy);
 void cpufreq_enable_fast_switch(struct cpufreq_policy *policy);

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1525284 — [PATCH 1/2] ACPI / processor: Make acpi_processor_ppc_has_changed() void

From"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Date2016-11-18 14:00 +0100
Subject[PATCH 1/2] ACPI / processor: Make acpi_processor_ppc_has_changed() void
Message-ID<sEQVQ-7dC-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1525278
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

The return value of acpi_processor_ppc_has_changed() is never used,
so make it void.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---
 drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c |   10 ++++------
 include/acpi/processor.h         |    2 +-
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
@@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ static void acpi_processor_ppc_ost(acpi_
 				  status, NULL);
 }
 
-int acpi_processor_ppc_has_changed(struct acpi_processor *pr, int event_flag)
+void acpi_processor_ppc_has_changed(struct acpi_processor *pr, int event_flag)
 {
 	int ret;
 
@@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ int acpi_processor_ppc_has_changed(struc
 		 */
 		if (event_flag)
 			acpi_processor_ppc_ost(pr->handle, 1);
-		return 0;
+		return;
 	}
 
 	ret = acpi_processor_get_platform_limit(pr);
@@ -182,10 +182,8 @@ int acpi_processor_ppc_has_changed(struc
 		else
 			acpi_processor_ppc_ost(pr->handle, 0);
 	}
-	if (ret < 0)
-		return (ret);
-	else
-		return cpufreq_update_policy(pr->id);
+	if (ret >= 0)
+		cpufreq_update_policy(pr->id);
 }
 
 int acpi_processor_get_bios_limit(int cpu, unsigned int *limit)
Index: linux-pm/include/acpi/processor.h
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/include/acpi/processor.h
+++ linux-pm/include/acpi/processor.h
@@ -295,7 +295,7 @@ static inline void acpi_processor_ffh_cs
 #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ
 void acpi_processor_ppc_init(void);
 void acpi_processor_ppc_exit(void);
-int acpi_processor_ppc_has_changed(struct acpi_processor *pr, int event_flag);
+void acpi_processor_ppc_has_changed(struct acpi_processor *pr, int event_flag);
 extern int acpi_processor_get_bios_limit(int cpu, unsigned int *limit);
 #else
 static inline void acpi_processor_ppc_init(void)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1526347 — Re: [PATCH 0/2] ACPI / processor / cpufreq: Function return value cleanups

FromViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Date2016-11-21 04:40 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/2] ACPI / processor / cpufreq: Function return value cleanups
Message-ID<sFNCy-44P-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1525278
On 18-11-16, 13:57, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Two cleanups related to unused function return values, [1/2] in processor_perflib.c
> and [2/2] in cpufreq.c.

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

-- 
viresh

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web