Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1469476 > unrolled thread

[PATCH] usbnet: ax88179_178a: Add support for writing the EEPROM

Started byAlban Bedel <alban.bedel@avionic-design.de>
First post2016-08-24 16:00 +0200
Last post2016-08-25 12:20 +0200
Articles 6 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  [PATCH] usbnet: ax88179_178a: Add support for writing the EEPROM Alban Bedel <alban.bedel@avionic-design.de> - 2016-08-24 16:00 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] usbnet: ax88179_178a: Add support for writing the EEPROM Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.com> - 2016-08-24 16:40 +0200
      Re: [PATCH] usbnet: ax88179_178a: Add support for writing the  EEPROM Alban Bedel <alban.bedel@avionic-design.de> - 2016-08-24 16:50 +0200
        Re: [PATCH] usbnet: ax88179_178a: Add support for writing the EEPROM Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.com> - 2016-08-25 11:30 +0200
          Re: [PATCH] usbnet: ax88179_178a: Add support for writing the  EEPROM Alban Bedel <alban.bedel@avionic-design.de> - 2016-08-25 12:10 +0200
            Re: [PATCH] usbnet: ax88179_178a: Add support for writing the EEPROM Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.com> - 2016-08-25 12:20 +0200

#1469476 — [PATCH] usbnet: ax88179_178a: Add support for writing the EEPROM

FromAlban Bedel <alban.bedel@avionic-design.de>
Date2016-08-24 16:00 +0200
Subject[PATCH] usbnet: ax88179_178a: Add support for writing the EEPROM
Message-ID<s9GSK-33R-49@gated-at.bofh.it>
Implement the .set_eeprom callback to allow setting the MAC address
as well as a few other parameters. Note that the EEPROM must have a
correct PID/VID checksum set otherwise the SROM is used and reads
return the SROM content.

Signed-off-by: Alban Bedel <alban.bedel@avionic-design.de>
---
 drivers/net/usb/ax88179_178a.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 57 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/net/usb/ax88179_178a.c b/drivers/net/usb/ax88179_178a.c
index e6338c16081a..e6a986303dad 100644
--- a/drivers/net/usb/ax88179_178a.c
+++ b/drivers/net/usb/ax88179_178a.c
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
 
 #define AX88179_PHY_ID				0x03
 #define AX_EEPROM_LEN				0x100
+#define AX_EEPROM_BLOCK				0x40u
 #define AX88179_EEPROM_MAGIC			0x17900b95
 #define AX_MCAST_FLTSIZE			8
 #define AX_MAX_MCAST				64
@@ -43,6 +44,7 @@
 #define AX_ACCESS_PHY				0x02
 #define AX_ACCESS_EEPROM			0x04
 #define AX_ACCESS_EFUS				0x05
+#define AX_RELOAD_EEPROM			0x06
 #define AX_PAUSE_WATERLVL_HIGH			0x54
 #define AX_PAUSE_WATERLVL_LOW			0x55
 
@@ -620,6 +622,60 @@ ax88179_get_eeprom(struct net_device *net, struct ethtool_eeprom *eeprom,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int
+ax88179_set_eeprom(struct net_device *net, struct ethtool_eeprom *eeprom,
+		   u8 *data)
+{
+	struct usbnet *dev = netdev_priv(net);
+	unsigned int offset = eeprom->offset;
+	unsigned int len = eeprom->len;
+	int i, err = 0;
+	u8 *block;
+
+	/* The EEPROM data must be aligned on blocks of 64 bytes */
+	if ((offset % AX_EEPROM_BLOCK) || (len % AX_EEPROM_BLOCK)) {
+		offset = eeprom->offset / AX_EEPROM_BLOCK * AX_EEPROM_BLOCK;
+		len = eeprom->len + eeprom->offset - offset;
+		len = DIV_ROUND_UP(len, AX_EEPROM_BLOCK) * AX_EEPROM_BLOCK;
+
+		block = kmalloc(len, GFP_KERNEL);
+		if (!block)
+			return -ENOMEM;
+
+		/* Copy the current data, we could skip some but KISS */
+		for (i = 0; i < len; i += AX_EEPROM_BLOCK) {
+			err = __ax88179_read_cmd(dev, AX_ACCESS_EEPROM,
+						 (offset + i) >> 1,
+						 AX_EEPROM_BLOCK >> 1,
+						 AX_EEPROM_BLOCK,
+						 &block[i], 0);
+			if (err < 0) {
+				kfree(block);
+				return err;
+			}
+		}
+		memcpy(block + eeprom->offset - offset, data, eeprom->len);
+	} else {
+		block = data;
+	}
+
+	for (i = 0; err >= 0 && i < len; i += AX_EEPROM_BLOCK) {
+		err = ax88179_write_cmd(dev, AX_ACCESS_EEPROM,
+					(offset + i) >> 1,
+					AX_EEPROM_BLOCK >> 1,
+					AX_EEPROM_BLOCK, &block[i]);
+	}
+
+	if (block != data)
+		kfree(block);
+
+	/* Reload the EEPROM */
+	if (err >= 0)
+		err = ax88179_write_cmd(dev, AX_RELOAD_EEPROM, 0, 0, 0, NULL);
+
+	return err < 0 ? err : 0;
+}
+
 static int ax88179_get_settings(struct net_device *net, struct ethtool_cmd *cmd)
 {
 	struct usbnet *dev = netdev_priv(net);
@@ -826,6 +882,7 @@ static const struct ethtool_ops ax88179_ethtool_ops = {
 	.set_wol		= ax88179_set_wol,
 	.get_eeprom_len		= ax88179_get_eeprom_len,
 	.get_eeprom		= ax88179_get_eeprom,
+	.set_eeprom		= ax88179_set_eeprom,
 	.get_settings		= ax88179_get_settings,
 	.set_settings		= ax88179_set_settings,
 	.get_eee		= ax88179_get_eee,
-- 
2.9.3

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1469497

FromOliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.com>
Date2016-08-24 16:40 +0200
Message-ID<s9Hvs-3yl-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1469476
On Wed, 2016-08-24 at 15:52 +0200, Alban Bedel wrote:
> Implement the .set_eeprom callback to allow setting the MAC address
> as well as a few other parameters. Note that the EEPROM must have a
> correct PID/VID checksum set otherwise the SROM is used and reads
> return the SROM content.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alban Bedel <alban.bedel@avionic-design.de>
> ---
>  drivers/net/usb/ax88179_178a.c | 57
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 57 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/usb/ax88179_178a.c
> b/drivers/net/usb/ax88179_178a.c
> index e6338c16081a..e6a986303dad 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/usb/ax88179_178a.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/usb/ax88179_178a.c
> @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
>  
>  #define AX88179_PHY_ID                         0x03
>  #define AX_EEPROM_LEN                          0x100
> +#define AX_EEPROM_BLOCK                                0x40u
>  #define AX88179_EEPROM_MAGIC                   0x17900b95
>  #define AX_MCAST_FLTSIZE                       8
>  #define AX_MAX_MCAST                           64
> @@ -43,6 +44,7 @@
>  #define AX_ACCESS_PHY                          0x02
>  #define AX_ACCESS_EEPROM                       0x04
>  #define AX_ACCESS_EFUS                         0x05
> +#define AX_RELOAD_EEPROM                       0x06
>  #define AX_PAUSE_WATERLVL_HIGH                 0x54
>  #define AX_PAUSE_WATERLVL_LOW                  0x55
>  
> @@ -620,6 +622,60 @@ ax88179_get_eeprom(struct net_device *net, struct
> ethtool_eeprom *eeprom,
>         return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static int
> +ax88179_set_eeprom(struct net_device *net, struct ethtool_eeprom
> *eeprom,
> +                  u8 *data)
> +{
> +       struct usbnet *dev = netdev_priv(net);
> +       unsigned int offset = eeprom->offset;
> +       unsigned int len = eeprom->len;
> +       int i, err = 0;
> +       u8 *block;
> +
> +       /* The EEPROM data must be aligned on blocks of 64 bytes */
> +       if ((offset % AX_EEPROM_BLOCK) || (len % AX_EEPROM_BLOCK)) {
> +               offset = eeprom->offset / AX_EEPROM_BLOCK *
> AX_EEPROM_BLOCK;
> +               len = eeprom->len + eeprom->offset - offset;
> +               len = DIV_ROUND_UP(len, AX_EEPROM_BLOCK) *
> AX_EEPROM_BLOCK;
> +
> +               block = kmalloc(len, GFP_KERNEL);
> +               if (!block)
> +                       return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +               /* Copy the current data, we could skip some but KISS
> */
> +               for (i = 0; i < len; i += AX_EEPROM_BLOCK) {
> +                       err = __ax88179_read_cmd(dev,
> AX_ACCESS_EEPROM,
> +                                                (offset + i) >> 1,
> +                                                AX_EEPROM_BLOCK >> 1,
> +                                                AX_EEPROM_BLOCK,
> +                                                &block[i], 0);
> +                       if (err < 0) {
> +                               kfree(block);
> +                               return err;
> +                       }
> +               }
> +               memcpy(block + eeprom->offset - offset, data,
> eeprom->len);
> +       } else {
> +               block = data;
> +       }
> +
> +       for (i = 0; err >= 0 && i < len; i += AX_EEPROM_BLOCK) {
> +               err = ax88179_write_cmd(dev, AX_ACCESS_EEPROM,
> +                                       (offset + i) >> 1,
> +                                       AX_EEPROM_BLOCK >> 1,
> +                                       AX_EEPROM_BLOCK, &block[i]);
> +       }
> +
> +       if (block != data)
> +               kfree(block);

And if block == dta, what frees the memory?

	Regards
		Oliver

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1469503 — Re: [PATCH] usbnet: ax88179_178a: Add support for writing the EEPROM

FromAlban Bedel <alban.bedel@avionic-design.de>
Date2016-08-24 16:50 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH] usbnet: ax88179_178a: Add support for writing the EEPROM
Message-ID<s9HF7-3BB-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1469497

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Wed, 24 Aug 2016 16:30:39 +0200
Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 2016-08-24 at 15:52 +0200, Alban Bedel wrote:
> > Implement the .set_eeprom callback to allow setting the MAC address
> > as well as a few other parameters. Note that the EEPROM must have a
> > correct PID/VID checksum set otherwise the SROM is used and reads
> > return the SROM content.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Alban Bedel <alban.bedel@avionic-design.de>
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/usb/ax88179_178a.c | 57
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 57 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/usb/ax88179_178a.c
> > b/drivers/net/usb/ax88179_178a.c
> > index e6338c16081a..e6a986303dad 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/usb/ax88179_178a.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/usb/ax88179_178a.c
> > @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
> >  
> >  #define AX88179_PHY_ID                         0x03
> >  #define AX_EEPROM_LEN                          0x100
> > +#define AX_EEPROM_BLOCK                                0x40u
> >  #define AX88179_EEPROM_MAGIC                   0x17900b95
> >  #define AX_MCAST_FLTSIZE                       8
> >  #define AX_MAX_MCAST                           64
> > @@ -43,6 +44,7 @@
> >  #define AX_ACCESS_PHY                          0x02
> >  #define AX_ACCESS_EEPROM                       0x04
> >  #define AX_ACCESS_EFUS                         0x05
> > +#define AX_RELOAD_EEPROM                       0x06
> >  #define AX_PAUSE_WATERLVL_HIGH                 0x54
> >  #define AX_PAUSE_WATERLVL_LOW                  0x55
> >  
> > @@ -620,6 +622,60 @@ ax88179_get_eeprom(struct net_device *net, struct
> > ethtool_eeprom *eeprom,
> >         return 0;
> >  }
> >  
> > +static int
> > +ax88179_set_eeprom(struct net_device *net, struct ethtool_eeprom
> > *eeprom,
> > +                  u8 *data)
> > +{
> > +       struct usbnet *dev = netdev_priv(net);
> > +       unsigned int offset = eeprom->offset;
> > +       unsigned int len = eeprom->len;
> > +       int i, err = 0;
> > +       u8 *block;
> > +
> > +       /* The EEPROM data must be aligned on blocks of 64 bytes */
> > +       if ((offset % AX_EEPROM_BLOCK) || (len % AX_EEPROM_BLOCK)) {
> > +               offset = eeprom->offset / AX_EEPROM_BLOCK *
> > AX_EEPROM_BLOCK;
> > +               len = eeprom->len + eeprom->offset - offset;
> > +               len = DIV_ROUND_UP(len, AX_EEPROM_BLOCK) *
> > AX_EEPROM_BLOCK;
> > +
> > +               block = kmalloc(len, GFP_KERNEL);
> > +               if (!block)
> > +                       return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > +               /* Copy the current data, we could skip some but KISS
> > */
> > +               for (i = 0; i < len; i += AX_EEPROM_BLOCK) {
> > +                       err = __ax88179_read_cmd(dev,
> > AX_ACCESS_EEPROM,
> > +                                                (offset + i) >> 1,
> > +                                                AX_EEPROM_BLOCK >> 1,
> > +                                                AX_EEPROM_BLOCK,
> > +                                                &block[i], 0);
> > +                       if (err < 0) {
> > +                               kfree(block);
> > +                               return err;
> > +                       }
> > +               }
> > +               memcpy(block + eeprom->offset - offset, data,
> > eeprom->len);
> > +       } else {
> > +               block = data;
> > +       }
> > +
> > +       for (i = 0; err >= 0 && i < len; i += AX_EEPROM_BLOCK) {
> > +               err = ax88179_write_cmd(dev, AX_ACCESS_EEPROM,
> > +                                       (offset + i) >> 1,
> > +                                       AX_EEPROM_BLOCK >> 1,
> > +                                       AX_EEPROM_BLOCK, &block[i]);
> > +       }
> > +
> > +       if (block != data)
> > +               kfree(block);  
> 
> And if block == dta, what frees the memory?

In this case this function didn't allocate any memory, so there is
nothing to free.

Alban 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1470002

FromOliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.com>
Date2016-08-25 11:30 +0200
Message-ID<s9Z90-7za-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1469503
On Wed, 2016-08-24 at 16:40 +0200, Alban Bedel wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Aug 2016 16:30:39 +0200
> Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, 2016-08-24 at 15:52 +0200, Alban Bedel wrote:

> > > +       if (block != data)
> > > +               kfree(block);  
> > 
> > And if block == dta, what frees the memory?
> 
> In this case this function didn't allocate any memory, so there is
> nothing to free.

Hi,

I see. kfree() has a check for NULL, so you could drop the
test, but it doesn't matter much either way.

	Regards
		Oliver

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1470034 — Re: [PATCH] usbnet: ax88179_178a: Add support for writing the EEPROM

FromAlban Bedel <alban.bedel@avionic-design.de>
Date2016-08-25 12:10 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH] usbnet: ax88179_178a: Add support for writing the EEPROM
Message-ID<s9ZLI-82P-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1470002

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Thu, 25 Aug 2016 11:16:36 +0200
Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 2016-08-24 at 16:40 +0200, Alban Bedel wrote:
> > On Wed, 24 Aug 2016 16:30:39 +0200
> > Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.com> wrote:
> >   
> > > On Wed, 2016-08-24 at 15:52 +0200, Alban Bedel wrote:  
> 
> > > > +       if (block != data)
> > > > +               kfree(block);    
> > > 
> > > And if block == dta, what frees the memory?  
> > 
> > In this case this function didn't allocate any memory, so there is
> > nothing to free.  
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I see. kfree() has a check for NULL, so you could drop the
> test, but it doesn't matter much either way.

I think you misunderstand something here. data is the buffer passed
by the caller and block is a local variable. There is two cases:

1) The data to write is block aligned, then we use the caller buffer
   as is and set block = data.
2) The requested data is not block aligned, then we kalloc block.

In both case the writing loop then use the block pointer. Afterwards
we only need to kfree block in case 2, that is when block != data.

Alban

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1470039

FromOliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.com>
Date2016-08-25 12:20 +0200
Message-ID<s9ZVn-86m-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1470034
On Thu, 2016-08-25 at 12:07 +0200, Alban Bedel wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Aug 2016 11:16:36 +0200
> Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, 2016-08-24 at 16:40 +0200, Alban Bedel wrote:
> > > On Wed, 24 Aug 2016 16:30:39 +0200
> > > Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.com> wrote:
> > >   
> > > > On Wed, 2016-08-24 at 15:52 +0200, Alban Bedel wrote:  
> > 
> > > > > +       if (block != data)
> > > > > +               kfree(block);    
> > > > 
> > > > And if block == dta, what frees the memory?  
> > > 
> > > In this case this function didn't allocate any memory, so there is
> > > nothing to free.  
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I see. kfree() has a check for NULL, so you could drop the
> > test, but it doesn't matter much either way.
> 
> I think you misunderstand something here. data is the buffer passed
> by the caller and block is a local variable. There is two cases:
> 
> 1) The data to write is block aligned, then we use the caller buffer
>    as is and set block = data.
> 2) The requested data is not block aligned, then we kalloc block.
> 
> In both case the writing loop then use the block pointer. Afterwards
> we only need to kfree block in case 2, that is when block != data.

Thanks for the clarification. Maybe worth a comment in the code?

	Regards
		Oliver

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web