Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1469832 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH v2] clk: fixed-factor: add optional dt-binding clock-flags

Started byStephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
First post2016-08-25 07:10 +0200
Last post2016-08-25 07:10 +0200
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH v2] clk: fixed-factor: add optional dt-binding clock-flags Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> - 2016-08-25 07:10 +0200

#1469832 — Re: [PATCH v2] clk: fixed-factor: add optional dt-binding clock-flags

FromStephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Date2016-08-25 07:10 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2] clk: fixed-factor: add optional dt-binding clock-flags
Message-ID<s9V5o-50Y-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
On 07/04, Jongsung Kim wrote:
> On 2016년 07월 02일 09:20, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Do you actually have an IC on the board that is doing some fixed
> > factor calculation? Or is this a clk driver design where we are
> > listing out each piece of an SoC's clk controller in DT?
> >
> The SoC has several PLLs of identical design, and one of them is divided
> to half and used for CPUs. The fixed-factor-clock represents the divider.
> 

Ok, so it sounds like we can have the driver that registers the
CPU PLL also register the fixed factor clk? I fail to see why we
need this from DT in that case.

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web