Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1469832 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-08-25 07:10 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-08-25 07:10 +0200 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH v2] clk: fixed-factor: add optional dt-binding clock-flags Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> - 2016-08-25 07:10 +0200
| From | Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-25 07:10 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2] clk: fixed-factor: add optional dt-binding clock-flags |
| Message-ID | <s9V5o-50Y-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On 07/04, Jongsung Kim wrote: > On 2016년 07월 02일 09:20, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > Do you actually have an IC on the board that is doing some fixed > > factor calculation? Or is this a clk driver design where we are > > listing out each piece of an SoC's clk controller in DT? > > > The SoC has several PLLs of identical design, and one of them is divided > to half and used for CPUs. The fixed-factor-clock represents the divider. > Ok, so it sounds like we can have the driver that registers the CPU PLL also register the fixed factor clk? I fail to see why we need this from DT in that case. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web