Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1469832

Re: [PATCH v2] clk: fixed-factor: add optional dt-binding clock-flags

From Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH v2] clk: fixed-factor: add optional dt-binding clock-flags
Date 2016-08-25 07:10 +0200
Message-ID <s9V5o-50Y-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (2 earlier) <rP8gV-3r9-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <rP8Ah-3MT-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <rPi6C-1fN-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <rQgYO-4Wp-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <rR1bj-7L2-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 07/04, Jongsung Kim wrote:
> On 2016년 07월 02일 09:20, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Do you actually have an IC on the board that is doing some fixed
> > factor calculation? Or is this a clk driver design where we are
> > listing out each piece of an SoC's clk controller in DT?
> >
> The SoC has several PLLs of identical design, and one of them is divided
> to half and used for CPUs. The fixed-factor-clock represents the divider.
> 

Ok, so it sounds like we can have the driver that registers the
CPU PLL also register the fixed factor clk? I fail to see why we
need this from DT in that case.

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH v2] clk: fixed-factor: add optional dt-binding clock-flags Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> - 2016-08-25 07:10 +0200

csiph-web