Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1466384 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-08-19 15:20 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-08-19 18:00 +0200 |
| Articles | 6 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
[PATCH 2/2] ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: Don't attempt to enable schedutil governor as module Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com> - 2016-08-19 15:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: Don't attempt to enable schedutil governor as module Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> - 2016-08-19 15:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: Don't attempt to enable schedutil governor as module Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com> - 2016-08-19 15:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: Don't attempt to enable schedutil governor as module Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com> - 2016-08-19 16:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: Don't attempt to enable schedutil governor as module Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> - 2016-08-19 18:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: Don't attempt to enable schedutil governor as module Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com> - 2016-08-19 18:00 +0200
| From | Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-19 15:20 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH 2/2] ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: Don't attempt to enable schedutil governor as module |
| Message-ID | <s7RSh-65h-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
The schedutil CPUFreq governor could be built as a module but the commit
58919e83c85c ("cpufreq / sched: Pass flags to cpufreq_update_util()")
made it non-modular so attempting to enable as module leads to a warning:
warning: symbol value 'm' invalid for CPU_FREQ_GOV_SCHEDUTIL
Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
---
arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig b/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig
index 0ccaa519f588..65b5b6172e83 100644
--- a/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig
@@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_DEFAULT_GOV_ONDEMAND=y
CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_POWERSAVE=m
CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_USERSPACE=m
CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_CONSERVATIVE=m
-CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_SCHEDUTIL=m
+CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_SCHEDUTIL=y
CONFIG_ARM_IMX6Q_CPUFREQ=y
CONFIG_QORIQ_CPUFREQ=y
CONFIG_CPU_IDLE=y
--
2.5.5
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-19 15:50 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: Don't attempt to enable schedutil governor as module |
| Message-ID | <s7Slj-6gW-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1466384 |
On 08/19/2016 03:12 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> The schedutil CPUFreq governor could be built as a module but the commit
> 58919e83c85c ("cpufreq / sched: Pass flags to cpufreq_update_util()")
> made it non-modular so attempting to enable as module leads to a warning:
>
> warning: symbol value 'm' invalid for CPU_FREQ_GOV_SCHEDUTIL
>
> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
>
> ---
>
> arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Looks good.
Applied... wait, no, these are not in samsung-soc list so they miss also
from patchwork. For reference:
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
Please post it to linux-samsung-soc, unless it goes through arm-soc or
other tree.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-19 15:50 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: Don't attempt to enable schedutil governor as module |
| Message-ID | <s7Slk-6gW-25@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1466435 |
Hello Krzysztof,
On 08/19/2016 09:40 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 08/19/2016 03:12 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> The schedutil CPUFreq governor could be built as a module but the commit
>> 58919e83c85c ("cpufreq / sched: Pass flags to cpufreq_update_util()")
>> made it non-modular so attempting to enable as module leads to a warning:
>>
>> warning: symbol value 'm' invalid for CPU_FREQ_GOV_SCHEDUTIL
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Looks good.
>
> Applied... wait, no, these are not in samsung-soc list so they miss also
> from patchwork. For reference:
> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
>
Sigh, get_maintainers.pl suggested me an insanely large cc list so I added
it manually... but I forgot linux-samsung-soc. I'll post v2.
> Please post it to linux-samsung-soc, unless it goes through arm-soc or
> other tree.
>
I think is OK if both patches go through your tree.
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
Best regards,
--
Javier Martinez Canillas
Open Source Group
Samsung Research America
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-19 16:00 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: Don't attempt to enable schedutil governor as module |
| Message-ID | <s7Sv0-6kb-35@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1466437 |
Hello Krzysztof,
On 08/19/2016 09:46 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>
> On 08/19/2016 09:40 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 08/19/2016 03:12 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>>> The schedutil CPUFreq governor could be built as a module but the commit
>>> 58919e83c85c ("cpufreq / sched: Pass flags to cpufreq_update_util()")
>>> made it non-modular so attempting to enable as module leads to a warning:
>>>
>>> warning: symbol value 'm' invalid for CPU_FREQ_GOV_SCHEDUTIL
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
>>>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig | 2 +-
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> Looks good.
>>
>> Applied... wait, no, these are not in samsung-soc list so they miss also
>> from patchwork. For reference:
>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
>>
>
> Sigh, get_maintainers.pl suggested me an insanely large cc list so I added
> it manually... but I forgot linux-samsung-soc. I'll post v2.
>
Damn... and now I forgot to include your collected tags in v2. I should not
post patches before having enough coffee, sorry about that.
Please let me know if you don't mind or if you prefer a resend.
Best regards,
--
Javier Martinez Canillas
Open Source Group
Samsung Research America
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-19 18:00 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: Don't attempt to enable schedutil governor as module |
| Message-ID | <s7Un7-7vi-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1466451 |
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 09:52:47AM -0400, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> Hello Krzysztof,
>
> On 08/19/2016 09:46 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> >
> > On 08/19/2016 09:40 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >> On 08/19/2016 03:12 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> >>> The schedutil CPUFreq governor could be built as a module but the commit
> >>> 58919e83c85c ("cpufreq / sched: Pass flags to cpufreq_update_util()")
> >>> made it non-modular so attempting to enable as module leads to a warning:
> >>>
> >>> warning: symbol value 'm' invalid for CPU_FREQ_GOV_SCHEDUTIL
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
> >>>
> >>> ---
> >>>
> >>> arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig | 2 +-
> >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> Looks good.
> >>
> >> Applied... wait, no, these are not in samsung-soc list so they miss also
> >> from patchwork. For reference:
> >> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
> >>
> >
> > Sigh, get_maintainers.pl suggested me an insanely large cc list so I added
> > it manually... but I forgot linux-samsung-soc. I'll post v2.
> >
>
> Damn... and now I forgot to include your collected tags in v2. I should not
> post patches before having enough coffee, sorry about that.
>
> Please let me know if you don't mind or if you prefer a resend.
No problem, no need to resend.
Applied to separate branch (not tagged yet) in case someone would like
to base on top of it. Then please let me know, I'll add a tag.
Mentioned commit is not yet in mainline and was applied recently, so I
remove the SHA from commit msg. The SHA might change and it's better not
to pollute the history in that case.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-19 18:00 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: Don't attempt to enable schedutil governor as module |
| Message-ID | <s7Un8-7vi-39@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1466520 |
Hello Krzysztof,
On 08/19/2016 11:51 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 09:52:47AM -0400, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> Hello Krzysztof,
>>
>> On 08/19/2016 09:46 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>>>
>>> On 08/19/2016 09:40 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> On 08/19/2016 03:12 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>>>>> The schedutil CPUFreq governor could be built as a module but the commit
>>>>> 58919e83c85c ("cpufreq / sched: Pass flags to cpufreq_update_util()")
>>>>> made it non-modular so attempting to enable as module leads to a warning:
>>>>>
>>>>> warning: symbol value 'm' invalid for CPU_FREQ_GOV_SCHEDUTIL
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>
>>>>> arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig | 2 +-
>>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> Looks good.
>>>>
>>>> Applied... wait, no, these are not in samsung-soc list so they miss also
>>>> from patchwork. For reference:
>>>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Sigh, get_maintainers.pl suggested me an insanely large cc list so I added
>>> it manually... but I forgot linux-samsung-soc. I'll post v2.
>>>
>>
>> Damn... and now I forgot to include your collected tags in v2. I should not
>> post patches before having enough coffee, sorry about that.
>>
>> Please let me know if you don't mind or if you prefer a resend.
>
> No problem, no need to resend.
>
I resent some minutes ago figure getting your email. So feel free to ignore v3.
> Applied to separate branch (not tagged yet) in case someone would like
> to base on top of it. Then please let me know, I'll add a tag.
>
> Mentioned commit is not yet in mainline and was applied recently, so I
> remove the SHA from commit msg. The SHA might change and it's better not
> to pollute the history in that case.
>
Ok, thanks for doing that.
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
Best regards,
--
Javier Martinez Canillas
Open Source Group
Samsung Research America
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web