Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1466520

Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: Don't attempt to enable schedutil governor as module

From Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: Don't attempt to enable schedutil governor as module
Date 2016-08-19 18:00 +0200
Message-ID <s7Un7-7vi-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <s7RSh-65h-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <s7RSh-65h-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <s7Slj-6gW-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <s7Slk-6gW-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <s7Sv0-6kb-35@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 09:52:47AM -0400, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> Hello Krzysztof,
> 
> On 08/19/2016 09:46 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> > 
> > On 08/19/2016 09:40 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >> On 08/19/2016 03:12 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> >>> The schedutil CPUFreq governor could be built as a module but the commit
> >>> 58919e83c85c ("cpufreq / sched: Pass flags to cpufreq_update_util()")
> >>> made it non-modular so attempting to enable as module leads to a warning:
> >>>
> >>> warning: symbol value 'm' invalid for CPU_FREQ_GOV_SCHEDUTIL
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
> >>>
> >>> ---
> >>>
> >>>  arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig | 2 +-
> >>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> Looks good.
> >>
> >> Applied... wait, no, these are not in samsung-soc list so they miss also
> >> from patchwork. For reference:
> >> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
> >>
> > 
> > Sigh, get_maintainers.pl suggested me an insanely large cc list so I added
> > it manually... but I forgot linux-samsung-soc. I'll post v2.
> > 
> 
> Damn... and now I forgot to include your collected tags in v2. I should not
> post patches before having enough coffee, sorry about that.
> 
> Please let me know if you don't mind or if you prefer a resend.

No problem, no need to resend.

Applied to separate branch (not tagged yet) in case someone would like
to base on top of it. Then please let me know, I'll add a tag.

Mentioned commit is not yet in mainline and was applied recently, so I
remove the SHA from commit msg. The SHA might change and it's better not
to pollute the history in that case.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH 2/2] ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: Don't attempt to enable schedutil governor as module Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com> - 2016-08-19 15:20 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: Don't attempt to enable  schedutil governor as module Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> - 2016-08-19 15:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: Don't attempt to enable  schedutil governor as module Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com> - 2016-08-19 15:50 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: Don't attempt to enable  schedutil governor as module Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com> - 2016-08-19 16:00 +0200
        Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: Don't attempt to enable  schedutil governor as module Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> - 2016-08-19 18:00 +0200
          Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: Don't attempt to enable  schedutil governor as module Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com> - 2016-08-19 18:00 +0200

csiph-web