Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1464222 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Stephen Boyd <stephen.boyd@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-08-17 00:50 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-08-19 03:30 +0200 |
| Articles | 4 — 4 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[PATCH v2] clk: max77686: Migrate to clk_hw based OF and registration APIs Stephen Boyd <stephen.boyd@linaro.org> - 2016-08-17 00:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] clk: max77686: Migrate to clk_hw based OF and registration APIs Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com> - 2016-08-17 05:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] clk: max77686: Migrate to clk_hw based OF and registration APIs Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> - 2016-08-17 08:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] clk: max77686: Migrate to clk_hw based OF and registration APIs Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> - 2016-08-19 03:30 +0200
| From | Stephen Boyd <stephen.boyd@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-17 00:50 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH v2] clk: max77686: Migrate to clk_hw based OF and registration APIs |
| Message-ID | <s6Vlg-Hl-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Now that we have clk_hw based provider APIs to register clks, we
can get rid of struct clk pointers while registering clks in
these drivers, allowing us to move closer to a clear split of
consumer and provider clk APIs.
Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
Cc: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <stephen.boyd@linaro.org>
---
drivers/clk/clk-max77686.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-max77686.c b/drivers/clk/clk-max77686.c
index 19f620856571..b637f5979023 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk-max77686.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk-max77686.c
@@ -62,9 +62,8 @@ struct max77686_clk_init_data {
struct max77686_clk_driver_data {
enum max77686_chip_name chip;
- struct clk **clks;
struct max77686_clk_init_data *max_clk_data;
- struct clk_onecell_data of_data;
+ size_t num_clks;
};
static const struct
@@ -160,6 +159,20 @@ static struct clk_ops max77686_clk_ops = {
.recalc_rate = max77686_recalc_rate,
};
+static struct clk_hw *
+of_clk_max77686_get(struct of_phandle_args *clkspec, void *data)
+{
+ struct max77686_clk_driver_data *drv_data = data;
+ unsigned int idx = clkspec->args[0];
+
+ if (idx >= drv_data->num_clks) {
+ pr_err("%s: invalid index %u\n", __func__, idx);
+ return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+ }
+
+ return &drv_data->max_clk_data[idx].hw;
+}
+
static int max77686_clk_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
@@ -209,14 +222,8 @@ static int max77686_clk_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (!drv_data->max_clk_data)
return -ENOMEM;
- drv_data->clks = devm_kcalloc(dev, num_clks,
- sizeof(*drv_data->clks), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!drv_data->clks)
- return -ENOMEM;
-
for (i = 0; i < num_clks; i++) {
struct max77686_clk_init_data *max_clk_data;
- struct clk *clk;
const char *clk_name;
max_clk_data = &drv_data->max_clk_data[i];
@@ -236,30 +243,23 @@ static int max77686_clk_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
max_clk_data->hw.init = &max_clk_data->clk_idata;
- clk = devm_clk_register(dev, &max_clk_data->hw);
- if (IS_ERR(clk)) {
- ret = PTR_ERR(clk);
+ ret = devm_clk_hw_register(dev, &max_clk_data->hw);
+ if (ret) {
dev_err(dev, "Failed to clock register: %d\n", ret);
return ret;
}
- ret = clk_register_clkdev(clk, max_clk_data->clk_idata.name,
- NULL);
+ ret = clk_hw_register_clkdev(&max_clk_data->hw,
+ max_clk_data->clk_idata.name, NULL);
if (ret < 0) {
dev_err(dev, "Failed to clkdev register: %d\n", ret);
return ret;
}
- drv_data->clks[i] = clk;
}
- platform_set_drvdata(pdev, drv_data);
-
if (parent->of_node) {
- drv_data->of_data.clks = drv_data->clks;
- drv_data->of_data.clk_num = num_clks;
- ret = of_clk_add_provider(parent->of_node,
- of_clk_src_onecell_get,
- &drv_data->of_data);
+ ret = of_clk_add_hw_provider(parent->of_node, of_clk_max77686_get,
+ drv_data);
if (ret < 0) {
dev_err(dev, "Failed to register OF clock provider: %d\n",
--
2.9.0.rc2.8.ga28705d
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-17 05:10 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2] clk: max77686: Migrate to clk_hw based OF and registration APIs |
| Message-ID | <s6ZoR-3CS-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1464222 |
Hello Stephen, On 08/16/2016 06:38 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > Now that we have clk_hw based provider APIs to register clks, we > can get rid of struct clk pointers while registering clks in > these drivers, allowing us to move closer to a clear split of > consumer and provider clk APIs. > > Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com> > Cc: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com> > Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <stephen.boyd@linaro.org> > --- The patch looks good to me. Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com> Also, I've tested this on an Exynos5800 Peach Pi Chromebook that has a max77802 (supported by this driver) and the clocks are working correctly. Tested-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com> Best regards, -- Javier Martinez Canillas Open Source Group Samsung Research America
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-17 08:10 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2] clk: max77686: Migrate to clk_hw based OF and registration APIs |
| Message-ID | <s72d3-5wn-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1464222 |
On 08/17/2016 12:38 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > Now that we have clk_hw based provider APIs to register clks, we > can get rid of struct clk pointers while registering clks in > these drivers, allowing us to move closer to a clear split of > consumer and provider clk APIs. > > Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com> > Cc: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com> > Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <stephen.boyd@linaro.org> > --- > drivers/clk/clk-max77686.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------------- > 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) Looks correct. The pr_err() could be replaced to dev_err() but first pointer to dev should be stored... so this may be fixed on different patch. Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> Best regards, Krzysztof
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-19 03:30 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2] clk: max77686: Migrate to clk_hw based OF and registration APIs |
| Message-ID | <s7GNc-7nF-23@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1464222 |
On 08/16, Stephen Boyd wrote: > Now that we have clk_hw based provider APIs to register clks, we > can get rid of struct clk pointers while registering clks in > these drivers, allowing us to move closer to a clear split of > consumer and provider clk APIs. > > Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com> > Cc: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com> > Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <stephen.boyd@linaro.org> > --- Applied to clk-next -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web