Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1460845 > unrolled thread

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [f2fs] ec795418c4: fsmark.files_per_sec -36.3% regression

Started by"Huang\, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
First post2016-08-12 01:00 +0200
Last post2016-08-24 19:00 +0200
Articles 3 — 3 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [LKP] [lkp] [f2fs] ec795418c4: fsmark.files_per_sec -36.3% regression "Huang\, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com> - 2016-08-12 01:00 +0200
    Re: [LKP] [lkp] [f2fs] ec795418c4: fsmark.files_per_sec -36.3%  regression Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> - 2016-08-12 03:30 +0200
      Re: [LKP] [lkp] [f2fs] ec795418c4: fsmark.files_per_sec -36.3% regression huang ying <huang.ying.caritas@gmail.com> - 2016-08-24 19:00 +0200

#1460845 — Re: [LKP] [lkp] [f2fs] ec795418c4: fsmark.files_per_sec -36.3% regression

From"Huang\, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
Date2016-08-12 01:00 +0200
SubjectRe: [LKP] [lkp] [f2fs] ec795418c4: fsmark.files_per_sec -36.3% regression
Message-ID<s577b-1Km-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Hi, Kim,

"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com> writes:
>>
>> [lkp] [f2fs] 3bdad3c7ee: aim7.jobs-per-min -25.3% regression
>> [lkp] [f2fs] b93f771286: aim7.jobs-per-min -81.2% regression
>>
>> In terms of the above regression, I could check that _reproduce_ procedure
>> includes mounting filesystem only. Is that correct?
>
> Sorry, our test system failed to generate reproduce steps for aim7.  We
> will implement it.
>
> - [lkp] [f2fs] 3bdad3c7ee: aim7.jobs-per-min -25.3% regression
>
> The disk is one 48G ram disk.  The steps for aim7 is,
>
> cat > workfile <<EOF
> FILESIZE: 1M
> POOLSIZE: 10M
> 10 disk_cp
> EOF
>
> (
> 	echo $HOSTNAME
> 	echo disk_cp
>
> 	echo 1
> 	echo 3000
> 	echo 2
> 	echo 3000
> 	echo 1
> ) | ./multitask -t &
>
>
> - [lkp] [f2fs] b93f771286: aim7.jobs-per-min -81.2% regression
>
> The disk is 4 12G ram disk, and setup RAID0 on them via mdadm.  The
> steps for aim7 is,
>
> cat > workfile <<EOF
> FILESIZE: 1M
> POOLSIZE: 10M
> 10 sync_disk_rw
> EOF
>
> (
> 	echo $HOSTNAME
> 	echo sync_disk_rw
>
> 	echo 1
> 	echo 600
> 	echo 2
> 	echo 600
> 	echo 1
> ) | ./multitask -t &

Any update on these 2 regressions?  Is the information is enough for you
to reproduce?

Best Regards,
Huang, Ying

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1460889 — Re: [LKP] [lkp] [f2fs] ec795418c4: fsmark.files_per_sec -36.3% regression

FromJaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Date2016-08-12 03:30 +0200
SubjectRe: [LKP] [lkp] [f2fs] ec795418c4: fsmark.files_per_sec -36.3% regression
Message-ID<s59sl-3pL-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1460845
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 03:49:41PM -0700, Huang, Ying wrote:
> Hi, Kim,
> 
> "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com> writes:
> >>
> >> [lkp] [f2fs] 3bdad3c7ee: aim7.jobs-per-min -25.3% regression
> >> [lkp] [f2fs] b93f771286: aim7.jobs-per-min -81.2% regression
> >>
> >> In terms of the above regression, I could check that _reproduce_ procedure
> >> includes mounting filesystem only. Is that correct?
> >
> > Sorry, our test system failed to generate reproduce steps for aim7.  We
> > will implement it.
> >
> > - [lkp] [f2fs] 3bdad3c7ee: aim7.jobs-per-min -25.3% regression
> >
> > The disk is one 48G ram disk.  The steps for aim7 is,
> >
> > cat > workfile <<EOF
> > FILESIZE: 1M
> > POOLSIZE: 10M
> > 10 disk_cp
> > EOF
> >
> > (
> > 	echo $HOSTNAME
> > 	echo disk_cp
> >
> > 	echo 1
> > 	echo 3000
> > 	echo 2
> > 	echo 3000
> > 	echo 1
> > ) | ./multitask -t &
> >
> >
> > - [lkp] [f2fs] b93f771286: aim7.jobs-per-min -81.2% regression
> >
> > The disk is 4 12G ram disk, and setup RAID0 on them via mdadm.  The
> > steps for aim7 is,
> >
> > cat > workfile <<EOF
> > FILESIZE: 1M
> > POOLSIZE: 10M
> > 10 sync_disk_rw
> > EOF
> >
> > (
> > 	echo $HOSTNAME
> > 	echo sync_disk_rw
> >
> > 	echo 1
> > 	echo 600
> > 	echo 2
> > 	echo 600
> > 	echo 1
> > ) | ./multitask -t &
> 
> Any update on these 2 regressions?  Is the information is enough for you
> to reproduce?

Sorry, I've had no time to dig this due to business travel now.
I'll check that when back to US.

Thanks,

> 
> Best Regards,
> Huang, Ying

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1469583

Fromhuang ying <huang.ying.caritas@gmail.com>
Date2016-08-24 19:00 +0200
Message-ID<s9JGV-4Wy-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1460889
Hi, Jaegeuk,

On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 6:22 PM, Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 03:49:41PM -0700, Huang, Ying wrote:
>> Hi, Kim,
>>
>> "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com> writes:
>> >>
>> >> [lkp] [f2fs] 3bdad3c7ee: aim7.jobs-per-min -25.3% regression
>> >> [lkp] [f2fs] b93f771286: aim7.jobs-per-min -81.2% regression
>> >>
>> >> In terms of the above regression, I could check that _reproduce_ procedure
>> >> includes mounting filesystem only. Is that correct?
>> >
>> > Sorry, our test system failed to generate reproduce steps for aim7.  We
>> > will implement it.
>> >
>> > - [lkp] [f2fs] 3bdad3c7ee: aim7.jobs-per-min -25.3% regression
>> >
>> > The disk is one 48G ram disk.  The steps for aim7 is,
>> >
>> > cat > workfile <<EOF
>> > FILESIZE: 1M
>> > POOLSIZE: 10M
>> > 10 disk_cp
>> > EOF
>> >
>> > (
>> >     echo $HOSTNAME
>> >     echo disk_cp
>> >
>> >     echo 1
>> >     echo 3000
>> >     echo 2
>> >     echo 3000
>> >     echo 1
>> > ) | ./multitask -t &
>> >
>> >
>> > - [lkp] [f2fs] b93f771286: aim7.jobs-per-min -81.2% regression
>> >
>> > The disk is 4 12G ram disk, and setup RAID0 on them via mdadm.  The
>> > steps for aim7 is,
>> >
>> > cat > workfile <<EOF
>> > FILESIZE: 1M
>> > POOLSIZE: 10M
>> > 10 sync_disk_rw
>> > EOF
>> >
>> > (
>> >     echo $HOSTNAME
>> >     echo sync_disk_rw
>> >
>> >     echo 1
>> >     echo 600
>> >     echo 2
>> >     echo 600
>> >     echo 1
>> > ) | ./multitask -t &
>>
>> Any update on these 2 regressions?  Is the information is enough for you
>> to reproduce?
>
> Sorry, I've had no time to dig this due to business travel now.
> I'll check that when back to US.

Any update?

Best Regards,
Huang, Ying

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web